This patch renames PackStack and related variable names to also contain align across Clang.
As it is right now, Clang already uses one stack to record the information from both #pragma
align and #pragma pack. Leaving it as PackStack is confusing, and could cause people to
ignore #pragma align when developing code that interacts with PackStack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93901
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Summary: In order for libc++ to meaningfully use `diagnose_if` warnings they need to be emitted from system headers by default. This patch changes the `diagnose_if` warning diagnostic to be shown in system headers.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28703
llvm-svn: 291963
Changed from:
keyword '__is_empty' will be treated as an identifier for the remainder of the translation unit
To:
keyword '__is_empty' will be made available as an identifier for the remainder of the translation unit
This is a more accurate description of clang's keyword compatibility feature,
given that some of the keywords are turned into context-sensitive keywords
(e.g. REVERTIBLE_TYPE_TRAIT) rather than being fully disabled.
llvm-svn: 196776
clang converts keywords to identifiers for compatibility with various system
headers such as GNU libc.
Implement a -Wkeyword-compat extension warning to diagnose those cases. The
warning is on by default but will generally be ignored in system headers. It
can however be enabled globally to aid standards conformance testing.
This also changes the __uptr keyword avoidance from r195710 to no longer
special-case system headers, bringing it in line with other similar workarounds
in clang.
Implementation returns bool for symmetry with token annotation functions.
Some examples:
warning: keyword '__is_pod' will be treated as an identifier for the remainder of the translation unit [-Wkeyword-compat]
struct __is_pod
warning: keyword '__uptr' will be treated as an identifier here [-Wkeyword-compat]
union w *__uptr;
llvm-svn: 196212
GNU libc uses '__uptr' as a member name in C mode, conflicting with the
eponymous MSVC pointer modifier keyword.
Detect and mark the token as an identifier when these specific conditions are
met. __uptr will continue to work as a keyword for the remainder of the
translation unit.
Fixes PR17824.
llvm-svn: 195710
CoreFoundation object-transfer properties audited, and add a #pragma
to cause them to be automatically applied to functions in a particular
span of code. This has to be implemented largely in the preprocessor
because of the requirement that the region be entirely contained in
a single file; that's hard to impose from the parser without registering
for a ton of callbacks.
llvm-svn: 140846
Xiangling Liao