Without this patch, the testcase would fail on the delinearization of the second
array:
; void foo(long n, long m, long o, double A[n][m][o]) {
; for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
; for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
; for (long k = 0; k < o; k++) {
; A[i+3][j-4][k+7] = 1.0;
; A[i][0][k] = 2.0;
; }
; }
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[3 + i0, -4 + i1, 7 + i2] };
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
Here is the output of FileCheck on the testcase without this patch:
; CHECK: [n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[i0, 0, i2] };
^
<stdin>:26:2: note: possible intended match here
[n, m, o] -> { Stmt_for_body6[i0, i1, i2] -> MemRef_A[o0] };
^
It is possible to find a good delinearization for A[i][0][k] only in the context
of the delinearization of both array accesses.
There are two ways to delinearize together all array subscripts touching the
same base address: either duplicate the code from scop detection to first gather
all array references and then run the delinearization; or as implemented in this
patch, use the same delinearization info that we computed during scop detection.
llvm-svn: 210117
Added set-memory:{content} and get-memory-address-hex: commands
to the test exe for gdb-remote. Added a test that sets the content
via the inferior command line, then reads it back via gdb-remote
with $m.
Passing on debugserver. Marked as fail on llgs. Implementing
in the llgs branch next.
llvm-svn: 210116
The tests check that the following transform happens:
(ldr|str) X, [x20]
...
sub x20, x20, #16
->
(ldr|str) X, [x20], #-16
with X being either w0, x0, s0, d0 or q0.
llvm-svn: 210113
This means the output of LowerFormalArguments returns a lowered
SDValue with the correct type (expected in SelectionDAGBuilder).
Without this, an assertion under a DEBUG macro triggers when those
types are passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 210102
This patch implements semantic analysis to make sure that the loop is in OpenMP canonical form.
This is the form required for 'omp simd', 'omp for' and other loop pragmas.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3778
llvm-svn: 210095
elements from {}, rather than value-initializing them. This permits calling an
initializer-list constructor or constructing a std::initializer_list object.
(It would also permit initializing a const reference or rvalue reference if
that weren't explicitly prohibited by other rules.)
llvm-svn: 210091
FileToMutable is what this class does, but this class (or, to be precise,
an instance of this class) is a wrapper of the other SimpleFile. It's odd
that the class was named like a function.
llvm-svn: 210089
just the extremely specific case of a trailing array element that couldn't be
initialized because the default constructor for the element type is deleted.
Also reword the diagnostic to better match our other context diagnostics and to
prepare for the implementation of core issue 1070.
llvm-svn: 210083
trailing elements as a single loop, rather than sometimes emitting a nest of
several loops. This fixes a bug where CodeGen would sometimes try to emit an
expression with the wrong type for the element being initialized. Plus various
other minor cleanups to the IR produced for array new initialization.
llvm-svn: 210079
Tobias Grosser