Summary:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
Libc++ goes out of it's way to diagnose `std::tuple` constructions which are UB due to lifetime bugs caused by reference creation. For example:
```
// The 'const std::string&' is created *inside* the tuple constructor, and its lifetime is over before the end of the constructor call.
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(std::make_tuple(42, "abc"));
```
However, we are over-aggressive and we incorrectly diagnose cases such as:
```
void foo(std::tuple<int const&, int const&> const&);
foo(std::make_tuple(42, 42));
```
This patch fixes the incorrectly diagnosed cases, as well as converting the diagnostic to use the newly added Clang trait `__reference_binds_to_temporary`. The new trait allows us to diagnose cases we previously couldn't such as:
```
std::tuple<int, const std::string&> t(42, "abc");
```
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41977
llvm-svn: 323380
In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensures
that each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operators
are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 294165
MSVC/clang-cl doesn't do a full EBO unless __declspec(empty_bases)
is applied to the derived type. This causes certain tuple tests
to fail.
This patch adds the empty_bases attribute to __tuple_impl in order
for tuple to fully provide the EBO.
llvm-svn: 292159
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
llvm-svn: 289773
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
llvm-svn: 289727
This patch removes libc++'s tuple extension which allowed it to be
constructed from fewer initializers than elements; with the remaining
elements being default constructed. However the implicit version of
this extension breaks conforming code. For example:
int fun(std::string);
int fun(std::tuple<std::string, int>);
int x = fun("hello"); // ambigious
Because existing code may already depend on this extension it can be re-enabled
by defining _LIBCPP_ENABLE_TUPLE_IMPLICIT_REDUCED_ARITY_EXTENSION.
Note that the explicit version of this extension is still supported,
although it's somewhat less useful than the implicit one.
llvm-svn: 289158
This is a breaking change. The SFINAE required is instantiated the second
the class is instantiated, and this can cause hard SFINAE errors
when applied to references to incomplete types. Ex.
struct IncompleteType;
extern IncompleteType it;
std::tuple<IncompleteType&> t(it); // SFINAE will blow up.
llvm-svn: 276598
Libc++ provides static assertions to detect reference binding issues inside
tuple. This patch adds tests for those diagnostics.
It should be noted that these static assertions technically violate the
standard since it allows these illegal bindings to occur.
Also see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20855
llvm-svn: 276078
This patch upgrades <tuple> to be C++17 compliant by implementing:
* tuple_size_v: This was forgotten when implementing the other _v traits.
* std::apply: This was added via LFTS v1 in p0220r1.
* std::make_from_tuple: This was added in p0209r2.
llvm-svn: 275745
This patch is the last in a series that replaces recursive meta-programming
in std::tuple with non-recursive implementations.
Previously std::tuple could only be instantiated with 126 elements before
it blew the max template instantiation depth. Now the size of std::tuple is
essentially unbounded (I've tested with over 5000 elements).
One unfortunate side-effect of this change is that tuple_constructible
and similar no longer short circuit after the first failure. Instead they
evaluate the conditions for all elements. This could be potentially breaking.
I plan to look into this further.
llvm-svn: 274331
Libc++ has to deduce the 'allocator_arg_t' parameter as 'AllocArgT' for the
following constructor:
template <class Alloc> tuple(allocator_arg_t, Alloc const&)
Previously libc++ has tried to support tags derived from 'allocator_arg_t' by
using 'is_base_of<AllocArgT, allocator_arg_t>'. However this breaks whenever a
2-tuple contains a reference to an incomplete type as its first parameter.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27684
llvm-svn: 273334
There are two main fixes in this patch.
First the constructor SFINAE was changed so that it's evaluated in two stages
where the first stage evaluates the "safe" SFINAE conditions and the second
evaluates the "dangerous" ones. The key is that the second stage is lazily
evaluated only if the first stage passes. This helps fix PR23256
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23256).
The second fix is for PR22806 and LWG issue 2549. This fix applies
the suggested resolution to the LWG issue in order to prevent the construction
of dangling references. The SFINAE for this check is contained within
the _PreferTupleLikeConstructor alias template. The tuple-like constructors
are disabled whenever that trait returns false.
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22806)
(http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2549)
llvm-svn: 266461
Summary:
A default uses-allocator constructor has been added since that overload was previously provided by the extended constructor.
Since Clang does implicit conversion checking after substitution this constructor has to deduce the allocator_arg_t parameter so that it can prevent the evaluation of "is_default_constructible" if the first argument doesn't match. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1391 for more information.
This patch fixes PR24779 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24779)
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19006
llvm-svn: 266409
Summary: Currently we only enable the use of __is_final(...) with Clang. GCC also provides __is_final(...) since 4.7 in all standard modes. This patch creates the macro _LIBCPP_HAS_IS_FINAL to note the availability of `__is_final`.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8795
llvm-svn: 239664
Summary:
Currently parts of the SFINAE on tuples default constructor always gets evaluated even when the default constructor is never called or instantiated. This can cause a hard compile error when a tuple is created with types that do not have a default constructor. Below is a self contained example using a pair like class. This code will not compile but probably should.
```
#include <type_traits>
template <class T>
struct IllFormedDefaultImp {
IllFormedDefaultImp(T x) : value(x) {}
constexpr IllFormedDefaultImp() {}
T value;
};
typedef IllFormedDefaultImp<int &> IllFormedDefault;
template <class T, class U>
struct pair
{
template <bool Dummy = true,
class = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_default_constructible<T>::value
&& std::is_default_constructible<U>::value
&& Dummy>::type
>
constexpr pair() : first(), second() {}
pair(T const & t, U const & u) : first(t), second(u) {}
T first;
U second;
};
int main()
{
int x = 1;
IllFormedDefault v(x);
pair<IllFormedDefault, IllFormedDefault> p(v, v);
}
```
One way to fix this is to use `Dummy` in a more involved way in the constructor SFINAE. The following patch fixes these sorts of hard compile errors for tuple.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: ldionne, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7569
llvm-svn: 230120
Eric Fiselier