Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95195
Ports 6e42a417ba since it's now needed, and undo an accidental
deletion from d69762c404 while here (this part is not needed to fix
the build, it's just in the vicinity).
This changes --print-before/after to be a list of strings rather than
legacy passes. (this also has the effect of not showing the entire list
of passes in --help-hidden after --print-before/after, which IMO is
great for making it less verbose).
Currently PrintIRInstrumentation passes the class name rather than pass
name to llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass(), meaning
llvm::shouldPrintBeforePass() never functions as intended in the NPM.
There is no easy way of converting class names to pass names outside of
within an instance of PassBuilder.
This adds a map of pass class names to their short names in
PassRegistry.def within PassInstrumentationCallbacks. It is populated
inside the constructor of PassBuilder, which takes a
PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
Add a pointer to PassInstrumentationCallbacks inside
PrintIRInstrumentation and use the newly created map.
This is a bit hacky, but I can't think of a better way since the short
id to class name only exists within PassRegistry.def. This also doesn't
handle passes not in PassRegistry.def but rather added via
PassBuilder::registerPipelineParsingCallback().
llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/print-after.ll doesn't seem very useful now
with this change.
Reviewed By: ychen, jamieschmeiser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87216
Revert "Delete llvm::is_trivially_copyable and CMake variable HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE"
This reverts commit 4d4bd40b57.
This reverts commit 557b00e0af.
GCC<5 did not support std::is_trivially_copyable. Now LLVM builds
require 5.1 we can delete llvm::is_trivially_copyable after the users
have been migrated to std::is_trivially_copyable.
This allows us to use its value everywhere, rather than just clang. Some
other places, like opt and lld, will use its value soon.
Rename it internally to LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER.
The #define for it is now in llvm-config.h.
The initial land accidentally set the value of
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER to the string
ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_NEW_PASS_MANAGER instead of its value.
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92072
This allows us to use its value everywhere, rather than just clang. Some
other places, like opt and lld, will use its value soon.
The #define for it is now in llvm-config.h.
Reviewed By: rnk, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92072
By explicitly requesting the system linker with `-fuse-ld=`, the
tests are able to CHECK for the system linker even with
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld.
Alternative to D74704.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92291
This patch:
- adds an ld64.lld.darwinnew symlink for lld, to go with f2710d4b57,
so that `clang -fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` can be used to test new
Mach-O lld while it's in bring-up. (The expectation is that we'll
remove this again once new Mach-O lld is the defauld and only Mach-O
lld.)
- lets the clang driver know if the linker is lld (currently
only triggered if `-fuse-ld=lld` or `-fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` is
passed). Currently only used for the next point, but could be used
to implement other features that need close coordination between
compiler and linker, e.g. having a diag for calling `clang++` instead
of `clang` when link errors are caused by a missing C++ stdlib.
- lets the clang driver pass `-demangle` to Mach-O lld (both old and
new), in addition to ld64
- implements -demangle for new Mach-O lld
- changes demangleItanium() to accept _Z, __Z, ___Z, ____Z prefixes
(and updates one test added in D68014). Mach-O has an extra
underscore for symbols, and the three (or, on Mach-O, four)
underscores are used for block names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91884
llvm-config output with the gn build is just good enough to make
tests pass, but llvm-config wants all .a files it knows about to
actually exist. So let it know about fewer .a files that don't
exist if not all targets are enabled.
The test needs an object file, which it currenty gets with
`-target x86_64-apple-darwin10`. Rather than adding `REQUIRES: X86`, create
the object file via yaml2obj. This way, the test runs and passes even if the
host arch isn't x86 and only the host arch is built.
Part of PR46644.
It'd be nicer if there was a group target that forwarded either to
//clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/remote or
//clangd/index/remote/unimplemented based on if remote index is enabled,
but for now it's never enabled in the gn build.
See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.
I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.
This reverts commit 7bdad08429,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.
Xiang1 Zhang