Clang CodeGen had a utility function for creating pointer alignment assumptions
using the @llvm.assume intrinsic. This functionality will also be needed by the
inliner (to preserve function-argument alignment attributes when inlining), so
this moves the utility function into IRBuilder where it can be used both by
Clang CodeGen and also other LLVM-level code.
llvm-svn: 219875
Store `User::NumOperands` (and `MDNode::NumOperands`) in `Value`.
On 64-bit host architectures, this reduces `sizeof(User)` and all
subclasses by 8, and has no effect on `sizeof(Value)` (or, incidentally,
on `sizeof(MDNode)`).
On 32-bit host architectures, this increases `sizeof(Value)` by 4.
However, it has no effect on `sizeof(User)` and `sizeof(MDNode)`, so the
only concrete subclasses of `Value` that actually see the increase are
`BasicBlock`, `Argument`, `InlineAsm`, and `MDString`. Moreover, I'll
be shocked and confused if this causes a tangible memory regression.
This has no functionality change (other than memory footprint).
llvm-svn: 219845
A follow-up commit will modify the memory-layout of `Value`, `User`, and
`MDNode`. First fix the comments to be doxygen-friendly (and to follow
the coding standards).
- Use "\brief" instead of "repeatedName -".
- Add a brief intro where it was missing.
- Remove duplicated comments from source files (and a couple of
noisy/trivial comments altogether).
llvm-svn: 219844
Follow-up to r219801. Post-commit review pointed out that all comments
require a `\brief` description [1], so I converted many and recrafted a
few to be briefer or to include a brief intro. (If I'm going to clean
them up, I should do it right!)
[1]: http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#doxygen-use-in-documentation-comments
llvm-svn: 219808
A number of comment cleanups:
- Remove duplicated function and class names from comments.
- Remove duplicated comments from source file (some of which were
out-of-sync).
- Move any unduplicated comments from source file to header.
- Remove some noisy comments entirely (e.g., a comment for
`DIDescriptor::print()` saying "print descriptor" just gets in the
way of reading the code).
llvm-svn: 219801
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitted in r219215, reverted in r219512, failure on ObjC++ atomic
properties in the test-suite on Darwin.
Fixed ObjC++ atomic properties issue in Clang in r219690.
[This commit is provided 'as is' with no hope that this is the last time
I commit this change either expressed or implied]
llvm-svn: 219702
The LLVM Lang Ref states for signed/unsigned int to float conversions:
"If the value cannot fit in the floating point value, the results are undefined."
And for FP to signed/unsigned int:
"If the value cannot fit in ty2, the results are undefined."
This matches the C definitions.
The existing behavior pins to infinity or a max int value, but that may just
lead to more confusion as seen in:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21130
Returning undef will hopefully lead to a less silent failure.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5603
llvm-svn: 219542
This invariant is violated (& the assertions fire) on some Objective C++
in the test-suite. Reverting while I investigate.
This reverts commit r219215.
llvm-svn: 219523
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitting and hoping that's the last of it.
[That one burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp.]
llvm-svn: 219215
group's interface to all of the implementations of that analysis group.
The groups themselves can and do manage this anyways, the pass registry
needn't involve itself.
llvm-svn: 219097
pass registry.
This style of registry is somewhat questionable, but it being
non-monotonic is crazy. No one is (or should be) unloading DSOs with
passes and unregistering them here. I've checked with a few folks and
I don't know of anyone using this functionality or any important use
case where it is necessary.
llvm-svn: 219096
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 219010
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
llvm-svn: 218914
This reverts commit r218820. It turns out that Adrian has an
outstanding SROA patch that uses this.
I've updated it to forward to `createExpression()`.
llvm-svn: 218828
I neglected to update `DIBuilder::createPieceExpression()` in r218797,
which I noticed while rebasing a patch for PR17891. On closer
inspection, it looks like dead code.
If there are any downstream users of this, you should transition to the
more general `createExpression()`. Or, we can add this back, but then
it should just forward to `createExpression()`.
llvm-svn: 218820
`DIExpression`'s elements are 64-bit integers that are stored as
`ConstantInt`. The accessors already encapsulate the storage. This
commit updates the `DIBuilder` API to also encapsulate that.
llvm-svn: 218797
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
r206400 and r209442 added remarks that are disabled by default.
However, if a diagnostic handler is registered, the remarks are sent
unfiltered to the handler. This is the right behaviour for clang, since
it has its own filters.
However, the diagnostic handler exposed in the LTO API receives only the
severity and message. It doesn't have the information to filter by pass
name. For LTO, disabled remarks should be filtered by the producer.
I've changed `LLVMContext::setDiagnosticHandler()` to take a `bool`
argument indicating whether to respect the built-in filters. This
defaults to `false`, so other consumers don't have a behaviour change,
but `LTOCodeGenerator::setDiagnosticHandler()` sets it to `true`.
To make this behaviour testable, I added a `-use-diagnostic-handler`
command-line option to `llvm-lto`.
This fixes PR21108.
llvm-svn: 218784
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 218778
Summary: These will be used to implement support for useful forward declarartions.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5328
llvm-svn: 217949
Summary:
replaceAllUsesWith had been modified to allow a DbgNode value to be
replaced by itself. In that case a new node is created by copying the
current DbgNode and the copy is used as replacement value.
When that copying happens, the value stored in this->DbgNode at the end
of RAUW would be a reference to the Node that has just been deleted.
This doesn't produce any bug right now, because the DI node on which we
call RAUW won't be used again.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5326
llvm-svn: 217749
RAUW was only used on DIType to merge declarations and full definitions
of types. In order to support the same functionality for functions and
global variables, move the function up type DI type hierarchy to the
common parent of DIType, DISubprogram and DIVariable which is
DIDescriptor.
This functionality will be exercized when we add the code to emit
imported declarations for forward declared function/variables.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5325
llvm-svn: 217748
With this a DataLayoutPass can be reused for multiple modules.
Once we have doInitialization/doFinalization, it doesn't seem necessary to pass
a Module to the constructor.
Overall this change seems in line with the idea of making DataLayout a required
part of Module. With it the only way of having a DataLayout used is to add it
to the Module.
llvm-svn: 217548
Noticed while trying to understand how the merge of forward decalred types
and defintions work.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5291
llvm-svn: 217514
to make sure we don't do invalid load of an enum. Share the
conversion code between llvm::Module implementation and the
verifier.
This bug was reported by UBSan.
llvm-svn: 217395
parsing (and latent bug in the instruction definitions).
This is effectively a revert of r136287 which tried to address
a specific and narrow case of immediate operands failing to be accepted
by x86 instructions with a pretty heavy hammer: it introduced a new kind
of operand that behaved differently. All of that is removed with this
commit, but the test cases are both preserved and enhanced.
The core problem that r136287 and this commit are trying to handle is
that gas accepts both of the following instructions:
insertps $192, %xmm0, %xmm1
insertps $-64, %xmm0, %xmm1
These will encode to the same byte sequence, with the immediate
occupying an 8-bit entry. The first form was fixed by r136287 but that
broke the prior handling of the second form! =[ Ironically, we would
still emit the second form in some cases and then be unable to
re-assemble the output.
The reason why the first instruction failed to be handled is because
prior to r136287 the operands ere marked 'i32i8imm' which forces them to
be sign-extenable. Clearly, that won't work for 192 in a single byte.
However, making thim zero-extended or "unsigned" doesn't really address
the core issue either because it breaks negative immediates. The correct
fix is to make these operands 'i8imm' reflecting that they can be either
signed or unsigned but must be 8-bit immediates. This patch backs out
r136287 and then changes those places as well as some others to use
'i8imm' rather than one of the extended variants.
Naturally, this broke something else. The custom DAG nodes had to be
updated to have a much more accurate type constraint of an i8 node, and
a bunch of Pat immediates needed to be specified as i8 values.
The fallout didn't end there though. We also then ceased to be able to
match the instruction-specific intrinsics to the instructions so
modified. Digging, this is because they too used i32 rather than i8 in
their signature. So I've also switched those intrinsics to i8 arguments
in line with the instructions.
In order to make the intrinsic adjustments of course, I also had to add
auto upgrading for the intrinsics.
I suspect that the intrinsic argument types may have led everything down
this rabbit hole. Pretty happy with the result.
llvm-svn: 217310
follows '~' in a clobber constraint string.
Previously llc would hit an llvm_unreachable when compiling an inline-asm
instruction with malformed constraint string "~x{21}". This commit enables
LLParser to catch the error earlier and print a more helpful diagnostic.
rdar://problem/14206559
llvm-svn: 217288
Summary:
Split shouldExpandAtomicInIR() into different versions for Stores/Loads/RMWs/CmpXchgs.
Makes runOnFunction cleaner (no more redundant checking/casting), and will help moving
the X86 backend to this pass.
This requires a way of easily detecting which instructions are atomic.
I followed the pattern of mayReadFromMemory, mayWriteOrReadMemory, etc.. in making
isAtomic() a method of Instruction implemented by a switch on the opcodes.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5035
llvm-svn: 217080
Adding 'IR' to the names in an attempt to be less ambiguous about the flags we're dealing with here.
The 'and' method is needed by the SLPVectorizer (PR20802) and possibly other passes.
llvm-svn: 217004
"Setting" does not equal "copying". This bug has sat dormant for 2 reasons:
1. The unit test was not adequate.
2. Every current user of the "copyFastMathFlags" API is operating on a new instruction.
(ie, all existing fast-math flags are off). If you copy flags to an existing
instruction that has some flags on already, you will not necessarily turn them off
as expected.
I uncovered this bug while trying to implement a fix for PR20802.
llvm-svn: 216939
Juergen Ributzka