Include CompilerRTCompile in fuzzer tests explicitly. Otherwise, when
building only libFuzzer, CMake fails due to:
CMake Error at cmake/Modules/AddCompilerRT.cmake:395 (sanitizer_test_compile):
Unknown CMake command "sanitizer_test_compile".
Call Stack (most recent call first):
lib/fuzzer/tests/CMakeLists.txt:53 (generate_compiler_rt_tests)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55378
llvm-svn: 348524
This fixes the issue introduced in r345765 which changed the way in
which the embedded libc++ is being built but omitted tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54058
llvm-svn: 346052
Summary:
Silence warning when linking unittest binary by not passing
-lstdc++ to the linker since it is ignored.
Reviewers: morehouse
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53225
llvm-svn: 344480
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, delcypher, morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 341082
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, delcypher, morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340949
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340860
Some warnings originating from googletest were causing bots to fail
while bulding unit tests. The sanitizers address this issue by not
using -Werror. We adopt this approach for libFuzzer.
llvm-svn: 335640
Don't hardcode the architecture for Fuzzer tests which breaks when
compiler-rt is being compiled for architectures other than x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48207
llvm-svn: 334852
LIT tests are used to test other cross-compiled architectures,
unit tests are only run on the host.
NFC now as currently only a single architecture is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47286
llvm-svn: 333241
It doesn't make sense to non-deterministically choose between
`CopyPart(..)` and `InsertPart(..)` when it is known that
`InsertPart(..)` will fail.
This upstream's a change from JFS solver's fork of LibFuzzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45693
llvm-svn: 330687
This test is failing on my Linux box. Just increasing the number of
iterations works around this. The divergence is likely due to
our reliance on `std::shuffle()` which is not guaranteed to have
the same behaviour across platforms.
This is a strong argument for us to implement our own shuffle
function to avoid divergence in behaviour across platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45767
llvm-svn: 330390
This changes the add_custom_libcxx macro to resemble the
llvm_ExternalProject_Add. The primary motivation is to avoid
unnecessary libFuzzer rebuilds that are being done on every
Ninja/Make invocation. The libc++ should be only rebuilt whenever
the libc++ source itself changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43213
llvm-svn: 326921
add_custom_libcxx uses the just built compiler and installs the
built libc++, e.g. for testing, neither of which is desirable in
case of Fuzzer where the libc++ should be built using the host
compiler and it's only linked into the libFuzzer and should never
be installed. This change introduces additional arguments to
add_custom_libcxx to allow parametrizing its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42330
llvm-svn: 323054
add_custom_libcxx uses the just built compiler and installs the
built libc++, e.g. for testing, neither of which is desirable in
case of Fuzzer where the libc++ should be built using the host
compiler and it's only linked into the libFuzzer and should never
be installed. This change introduces additional arguments to
add_custom_libcxx to allow parametrizing its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42330
llvm-svn: 323032
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322755
This is needed in case the users of libFuzzer use libc++ in their
code, which the fuzz target (libFuzzer) will be linked against.
When libc++ source is available, we build a private version of it
and link it against libFuzzer which allows using the same static
library against codebases which use both libc++ and libstdc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37631
llvm-svn: 322604
Summary: With 3 Dictionary objects, each containing space of ~16k DictionaryEntry objects, the MutationDispatcher object is fairly memory heavy. On platforms with a lower default stack size, this can cause panics in FuzzerUnittest as those tests stack-allocate the MutationDispatcher. This may be especially problematic for platforms that do not (yet) have a way to programmatically change their stack size, aside from link-time flags. In general, it seems more prudent to use the heap for an object of this size.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40926
llvm-svn: 319988
Summary:
To be more portable (especially w.r.t. platforms without system()),
commands should be managed programmatically rather than via string
manipulation on the command line. This change introduces
Fuzzer::Command, with methods to manage arguments and flags, set output
options, and execute the command.
Patch By: aarongreen
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc, morehouse
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40103
llvm-svn: 319680
Resulting library binaries will be named libclang_rt.fuzzer*, and will
be placed in Clang toolchain, allowing redistribution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36908
llvm-svn: 311407
Michal Gorny