The internalization pass only internalizes global variables
with no users. If the global variable has some dead user,
the internalization pass will not internalize it.
To be able to internalize global variables with dead
users, a global dce pass is needed before the
internalization pass.
This patch adds that.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Matt Arsenault
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98783
Debug intrinsics are free to hoist and should be skipped when looking
for terminator-only blocks. As a consequence, we have to delegate to the
main hoisting loop to hoist any dbg intrinsics instead of jumping to the
terminator case directly.
This fixes PR49982.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100640
It will not do anything useful for them, as we already know that
they don't modref with any accessible memory.
In particular, this prevents noalias metadata from being placed
on noalias.scope.decl intrinsics. This reduces the amount of
metadata needed, and makes it more likely that unnecessary decls
can be eliminated.
Such attributes can either be unset, or set to "true" or "false" (as string).
throughout the codebase, this led to inelegant checks ranging from
if (Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
to
if (Fn->hasAttribute("no-jump-tables") && Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
Introduce a getValueAsBool that normalize the check, with the following
behavior:
no attributes or attribute set to "false" => return false
attribute set to "true" => return true
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99299
If we have a nobuiltin function, we can't assume we know anything about the implementation.
I noticed this when tracing through a log from an in the wild miscompile (https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/9443) triggered after 8666463. We were incorrectly assuming that a custom allocator could not free. (It's not clear yet this is the only problem in said issue.)
I also noticed something similiar mentioned in the commit message of ab243e when scrolling back through history. Through, from what I can tell, that commit fixed symptom not root cause.
The interface we have for library function detection is extremely error prone, but given the interaction between ``nobuiltin`` decls and ``builtin`` callsites, it's really hard to imagine something much cleaner. I may iterate on that, but it'll be invasive enough I didn't want to hold an obvious functional fix on it.
Have funcattrs expand all implied attributes into the IR. This expands the infrastructure from D100400, but for definitions not declarations this time.
Somewhat subtly, this mostly isn't semantic. Because the accessors did the inference, any client which used the accessor was already getting the stronger result. Clients that directly checked presence of attributes (there are some), will see a stronger result now.
The old behavior can end up quite confusing for two reasons:
* Without this change, we have situations where function-attrs appears to fail when inferring an attribute (as seen by a human reading IR), but that consuming code will see that it should have been implied. As a human trying to sanity check test results and study IR for optimization possibilities, this is exceeding error prone and confusing. (I'll note that I wasted several hours recently because of this.)
* We can have transforms which trigger without the IR appearing (on inspection) to meet the preconditions. This change doesn't prevent this from happening (as the accessors still involve multiple checks), but it should make it less frequent.
I'd argue in favor of deleting the extra checks out of the accessors after this lands, but I want that in it's own review as a) it's purely stylistic, and b) I already know there's some disagreement.
Once this lands, I'm also going to do a cleanup change which will delete some now redundant duplicate predicates in the inference code, but again, that deserves to be a change of it's own.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100226
Instead of managing memory by hand, delegate it to std::vector. This makes the
code much simpler, and also avoids repeatedly computing the storage size.
According to valgrind --tool=callgrind, this also slightly decreases the
instruction count, but by a small margin.
This is a recommit of 82f0e3d3ea with one usage
fixed in llvm/lib/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.cpp.
Not the slight API change: BitVector::clear() now has the same behavior as any
other container: it does not free memory, but indeed sets the size of the
BitVector to 0. It is thus incorrect to access its content right afterwards, a
scenario which wasn't enforced in previous implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100387
These lines set the value to what it already was,
so they are redundant. NFC
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100664
Change-Id: Ibf6f27d50a7fa1f76c127f01b799821378bfd3b3
Gives reasoning for convertDPP8.
Also corrects typo in Operand type comment.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100665
Change-Id: I33ff269db8072d83e5e0ecdbfb731d6000fc26c4
Use the target-independent @llvm.fptosi and @llvm.fptoui intrinsics instead.
This includes removing the instrinsics for i32x4.trunc_sat_zero_f64x2_{s,u},
which are now represented in IR as a saturating truncation to a v2i32 followed by
a concatenation with a zero vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100596
This patch clarifies the semantics of the nofree function attribute to make clear that it provides an "as if" semantic. That is, a nofree function is guaranteed not to free memory which existed before the call, but might allocate and then deallocate that same memory within the lifetime of the callee.
This is the result of the discussion on llvm-dev under the thread "Ambiguity in the nofree function attribute".
The most important part of this change is the LangRef wording. The rest is minor comment changes to emphasize the new semantics where code was accidentally consistent, and fix one place which wasn't consistent. That one place is currently narrowly used as it is primarily part of the ongoing (and not yet enabled) deref-at-point semantics work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100141
Attributes don't know their parent Context, adding this would make Attribute larger. Instead, we add hasParentContext that answers whether this Attribute belongs to a particular LLVMContext by checking for itself inside the context's FoldingSet. Same with AttributeSet and AttributeList. The Verifier checks them with the Module context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99362
This patch prevents phi-node-elimination from generating a COPY
operation for the register defined by t2WhileLoopStartLR, as it is a
terminator that defines a value.
This happens because of the presence of phi-nodes in the loop body (the
Preheader of which is the block containing the t2WhileLoopStartLR). If
this is not done, the COPY is generated above/before the terminator
(t2WhileLoopStartLR here), and since it uses the value defined by
t2WhileLoopStartLR, MachineVerifier throws a 'use before define' error.
This essentially adds on to the change in differential D91887/D97729.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100376
The implementation supports static schedule for Fortran do loops. This
implements the dynamic variant of the same concept.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97393
Add the `IsText` argument to `GetFile` and `GetFileOrSTDIN` which will help z/OS distinguish between text and binary correctly. This is an extension to [this patch](https://reviews.llvm.org/D97785)
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan, amccarth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100488
This is an alternative to D99759 to avoid the compile-time explosion seen in:
https://llvm.org/PR49785
Another potential solution would make the exclusion logic stronger to avoid
blowing up, but note that we reduced the complexity of the exclusion mechanism
in D16204 because it was too costly.
So I'm questioning the need for recursion/exclusion entirely - what is the
optimization value vs. cost of recursively computing known bits based on
assumptions?
This was built into the implementation from the start with 60db058,
and we have kept adding code/cost to deal with that capability.
By clearing the query's AssumptionCache inside computeKnownBitsFromAssume(),
this patch retains all existing assume functionality except refining known
bits based on even more assumptions.
We have 1 regression test that shows a difference in optimization power.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100573
Sometimes LV has to produce really wide vectors,
and sometimes they end up being not powers of two.
As it can be seen from the diff, the cost computation
is currently completely non-sensical in those cases.
Instead of just scalarizing everything, split/factorize the wide vector
into a number of subvectors, each one having a power-of-two elements,
recurse to get the cost of op on this subvector. Also, check how we'd
legalize this subvector, and if the legalized type is scalar,
also account for the scalarization cost.
Note that for sub-vector loads, we might be able to do better,
when the vectors are properly aligned.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100099
On Windows, we want to open a file in Binary mode if OF_CRLF bit is not set. On z/OS, we want to open a file in Binary mode if the OF_Text bit is not set.
This patch creates two new functions called ChangeStdinMode and ChangeStdoutMode which will take OpenFlags as an arg to determine which mode to set stdin and stdout to. This will enable patches like https://reviews.llvm.org/D100056 to not affect Windows when setting the OF_Text flag for raw_fd_streams.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100130
Combine sub 0, csinc X, Y, CC to csinv -X, Y, CC providing that the
negation of X is cheap, currently just handling constants. This comes up
during the splat of an i1 to a predicate, where we now generate csetm,
as opposed to cset; rsb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99940
It has to save all caller-saved registers before a call in the handler.
So don't emit a call that save/restore registers.
Reviewed By: simoncook, luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100532
Part of the code related to ds_read/ds_write ISel is refactored, and the
corresponding comment is re-written for better readability, which would help
while implementing any future ds_read/ds_write ISel related modifications.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100300
These were misleading, they're more of a "clear" than an "invalidate".
We shouldn't be individually clearing analysis results. Either we clear
all analyses when some IR becomes invalid, or we properly go through
invalidation.
There was only one use of this, which can be simulated with
AM.invalidate(F, PA).
Reviewed By: mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100519
str(n)cat appends a copy of the second argument to the end of the first
argument. To find the end of the first argument, str(n)cat has to read
from it until it finds the terminating 0. So it should not be marked as
writeonly. I think this means the argument should not be marked as
writeonly.
(This is causing a mis-compile with legacy DSE, before it got removed)
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100601
When we pass a AArch64 Homogeneous Floating-Point
Aggregate (HFA) argument with increased alignment
requirements, for example
struct S {
__attribute__ ((__aligned__(16))) double v[4];
};
Clang uses `[4 x double]` for the parameter, which is passed
on the stack at alignment 8, whereas it should be at
alignment 16, following Rule C.4 in
AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#642parameter-passing-rules)
Currently we don't have a way to express in LLVM IR the
alignment requirements of the function arguments. The align
attribute is applicable to pointers only, and only for some
special ways of passing arguments (e..g byval). When
implementing AAPCS32/AAPCS64, clang resorts to dubious hacks
of coercing to types, which naturally have the needed
alignment. We don't have enough types to cover all the
cases, though.
This patch introduces a new use of the stackalign attribute
to control stack slot alignment, when and if an argument is
passed in memory.
The attribute align is left as an optimizer hint - it still
applies to pointer types only and pertains to the content of
the pointer, whereas the alignment of the pointer itself is
determined by the stackalign attribute.
For byval arguments, the stackalign attribute assumes the
role, previously perfomed by align, falling back to align if
stackalign` is absent.
On the clang side, when passing arguments using the "direct"
style (cf. `ABIArgInfo::Kind`), now we can optionally
specify an alignment, which is emitted as the new
`stackalign` attribute.
Patch by Momchil Velikov and Lucas Prates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98794
Move some utility functions which are used within LDS lowering pass to a separate utils
file so that other LDS related passes can make use of them when required.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100526
This generalizes RVInstIShift/RVInstIShiftW to take the upper
5 or 7 bits of the immediate as an input instead of only bit 30. Then
we can share them.
For RVInstIShift I left a hardcoded 0 at bit 26 where RV128 gets
a 7th bit for the shift amount.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100424
Avoid visiting repeated instructions for processHeaderPhiOperands as it can cause a scenario of endless loop. Test case is attached and can be ran with `opt -basic-aa -tbaa -loop-unroll-and-jam -allow-unroll-and-jam -unroll-and-jam-count=4`.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97407
Being lazy with printing the banner seems hard to reason with, we should print it
unconditionally first (it could also lead to duplicate banners if we
have multiple functions in -filter-print-funcs).
The printIR() functions were doing too many things. I separated out the
call from PrintPassInstrumentation since we were essentially doing two
completely separate things in printIR() from different callers.
There were multiple ways to generate the name of some IR. That's all
been moved to getIRName(). The printing of the IR name was also
inconsistent, now it's always "IR Dump on $foo" where "$foo" is the
name. For a function, it's the function name. For a loop, it's what's
printed by Loop::print(), which is more detailed. For an SCC, it's the
list of functions in parentheses. For a module it's "[module]", to
differentiate between a possible SCC with a function called "module".
To preserve D74814, we have to check if we're going to print anything at
all first. This is unfortunate, but I would consider this a special
case that shouldn't be handled in the core logic.
Reviewed By: jamieschmeiser
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100231
There are four new PowerPC instructions that are introduced in
Power 10. They are hashst, hashchk, hashstp, hashchkp.
These instructions will be used for ROP Protection.
This patch adds the four instructions.
Reviewed By: nemanjai, amyk, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99375
This patch changed the isLegalUse check to ensure that
LSRInstance::GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl generates an
offset that results in a legal addressing mode and
formula. The check is changed to look similar to the
assert check used for illegal formulas.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100383
Change-Id: Iffb9e32d59df96b8f072c00f6c339108159a009a
Value::replaceUsesOutsideBlock doesn't replace debug uses which leads to an
unnecessary reduction in variable location coverage. Fix this, add a unittest for
it, and add a regression test demonstrating the change through instcombine's
replacedSelectWithOperand.
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99169
The `e_flags` contains a mixture of bitfields and regular ones, ensure all of them can be serialized and deserialized.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100250
Returning in memory is not supported, so fall back to sret.
Also, extend i1 and i16 to i32. Otherwise, they would be passed through
memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100543
If we are truncating from a i32 source before comparing the result against zero, then see if we can directly compare the source value against zero.
If the upper (truncated) bits are known to be zero then we can compare against that, hopefully increasing the chances of us folding the compare into a EFLAG result of the source's operation.
Fixes PR49028.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100491
With this patch vbslq_f32(vnegq_s32(a), b, c) lowers to a BIT instruction.
Co-authored-by: Paul Walker <paul.walker@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100304
Yaxun (Sam) Liu