This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
Similar to variables with an initializer, this is never valid in
standard C, so we can safely constant-fold as an extension. I ran into
this construct in a couple proprietary codebases.
While I'm here, drive-by fix for 090dd647: we should only fold variables
with VLA types, not arbitrary variably modified types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98363
This change splits '-Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare' by reporting
char-expressions-interpreted-as-unsigned under a separate diagnostic
'-Wtautological-unsigned-char-zero-compare'. This is beneficial for
projects that want to enable '-Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare' but at
the same time want to keep code portable for platforms with char being
signed or unsigned, such as Chromium.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99808
These proposals make the same changes to both C++ and C and remove a
restriction on standard attributes appearing multiple times in the same
attribute list.
We could warn on the duplicate attributes, but do not. This is for
consistency as we do not warn on attributes duplicated within the
attribute specifier sequence. If we want to warn on duplicated
standard attributes, we should do so both for both situations:
[[foo, foo]] and [[foo]][[foo]].
Clang currently has a bug where it allows you to write [[foo bar]] and
both attributes are silently accepted. This patch corrects the comma
parsing rules for such attributes and handles the test case fallout, as
a few tests were accidentally doing this.
This implements C-style type conversions for matrix types, as specified
in clang/docs/MatrixTypes.rst.
Fixes PR47141.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99037
I have been trying to statically find and analyze all calls to heap
allocation functions to determine how many of them use sizes known at
compile time vs only at runtime. While doing so I saw that quite a few
projects use replaceable function pointers for heap allocation and noticed
that clang was not able to annotate functions pointers with alloc_size.
I have changed the Sema checks to allow alloc_size on all function pointers
and typedefs for function pointers now and added checks that these
attributes are propagated to the LLVM IR correctly.
With this patch we can also compute __builtin_object_size() for calls to
allocation function pointers with the alloc_size attribute.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55212
Recently atomicrmw started to support fadd/fsub:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53965
However clang atomic builtins fetch add/sub still does not support
emitting atomicrmw fadd/fsub.
This patch adds that.
Reviewed by: John McCall, Artem Belevich, Matt Arsenault, JF Bastien,
James Y Knight, Louis Dionne, Olivier Giroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71726
Currently, when one or more attributes are mutually exclusive, the
developer adding the attribute has to manually emit diagnostics. In
practice, this is highly error prone, especially for declaration
attributes, because such checking is not trivial. Redeclarations
require you to write a "merge" function to diagnose mutually exclusive
attributes and most attributes get this wrong.
This patch introduces a table-generated way to specify that a group of
two or more attributes are mutually exclusive:
def : MutualExclusions<[Attr1, Attr2, Attr3]>;
This works for both statement and declaration attributes (but not type
attributes) and the checking is done either from the common attribute
diagnostic checking code or from within mergeDeclAttribute() when
merging redeclarations.
```
Warn when a function pointer is cast to an incompatible function
pointer. In a cast involving function types with a variable argument
list only the types of initial arguments that are provided are
considered. Any parameter of pointer-type matches any other
pointer-type. Any benign differences in integral types are ignored, like
int vs. long on ILP32 targets. Likewise type qualifiers are ignored. The
function type void (*) (void) is special and matches everything, which
can be used to suppress this warning. In a cast involving pointer to
member types this warning warns whenever the type cast is changing the
pointer to member type. This warning is enabled by -Wextra.
```
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97831
Clang currently automates a fair amount of diagnostic checking for
declaration attributes based on the declarations in Attr.td. It checks
for things like subject appertainment, number of arguments, language
options, etc. This patch uses the same machinery to perform diagnostic
checking on statement attributes.
This would assert if we hit the evaluation step limit between starting
to delay the call and finishing. In any case, delaying the call was
largely pointless as it doesn't really matter when we mark the
evaluation as having had side effects.
This was motivated by the fact that constructor type homing (debug info
optimization that we want to turn on by default) drops some libc++ types,
so an attribute would allow us to override constructor homing and emit
them anyway. I'm currently looking into the particular libc++ issue, but
even if we do fix that, this issue might come up elsewhere and it might be
nice to have this.
As I've implemented it now, the attribute isn't specific to the
constructor homing optimization and overrides all of the debug info
optimizations.
Open to discussion about naming, specifics on what the attribute should do, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97411
WG14 adopted N2626 at the meetings this week. This commit adds support
for using ' as a digit separator in a numeric literal which is
compatible with the C++ feature.
This patch extends the matrix spec to allow matrix-by-scalar division.
Originally support for `/` was left out to avoid ambiguity for the
matrix-matrix version of `/`, which could either be elementwise or
specified as matrix multiplication M1 * (1/M2).
For the matrix-scalar version, no ambiguity exists; `*` is also
an elementwise operation in that case. Matrix-by-scalar division
is commonly supported by systems including Matlab, Mathematica
or NumPy.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97857
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42154.
GCC's __attribute__((align)) can reduce the alignment of a type when applied to
a typedef. However, functions which take a pointer or reference to the
original type are compiled assuming the original alignment. Therefore when any
such function is passed an object of the new, less-aligned type, an alignment
fault can occur. In particular, this applies to the constructor, which is
defined for the original type and called for the less-aligned object.
This change adds a warning whenever an pointer or reference to an object is
passed to a function that was defined for a more-aligned type.
The calls to ASTContext::getTypeAlignInChars seem change the order in which
record layouts are evaluated, which caused changes to the output of
-fdump-record-layouts. As such some tests needed to be updated:
* Use CHECK-LABEL rather than counting the number of "Dumping AST Record
Layout" headers.
* Check for end of line in labels, so that struct B1 doesn't match struct B
etc.
* Add --strict-whitespace, since the whitespace shows meaningful structure.
* The order in which record layouts are printed has changed in some cases.
* clang-format for regions changed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97187
Our diagnostics relating to static assertions were a bit confused. For
instance, when in MS compatibility mode in C (where we accept
static_assert even without including <assert.h>), we would fail
to warn the user that they were using the wrong spelling (even in
pedantic mode), we were missing a compatibility warning about using
_Static_assert in earlier standards modes, diagnostics for the optional
message were not reflected in C as they were in C++, etc.
For ELF targets, GCC 11 will set SHF_GNU_RETAIN on the section of a
`__attribute__((retain))` function/variable to prevent linker garbage
collection. (See AttrDocs.td for the linker support).
This patch adds `retain` functions/variables to the `llvm.used` list, which has
the desired linker GC semantics. Note: `retain` does not imply `used`,
so an unused function/variable can be dropped by Sema.
Before 'retain' was introduced, previous ELF solutions require inline asm or
linker tricks, e.g. `asm volatile(".reloc 0, R_X86_64_NONE, target");`
(architecture dependent) or define a non-local symbol in the section and use
`ld -u`. There was no elegant source-level solution.
With D97448, `__attribute__((retain))` will set `SHF_GNU_RETAIN` on ELF targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97447
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
When compiling UEFI applications, the main function is named
efi_main() instead of main(). Let's exclude efi_main() from
-Wmissing-prototypes as well to avoid warnings when working
on UEFI applications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95746
mode.
We use that mode when evaluating ICEs in C, and those shortcuts could
result in ICE evaluation producing the wrong answer, specifically if we
evaluate a statement-expression as part of evaluating the ICE.
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238.
if E is merely instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 34e72a146111dd986889a0f0ec8767b2ca6b2913;
re-committed with a fix to an issue that caused name mangling to assert.
The `-Wpointer-sign` warning text is inappropriate for describing the
incompatible pointer conversion between plain `char` and explicitly
`signed`/`unsigned` `char` (whichever plain `char` has the same range
as) and vice versa.
Specifically, in part, it reads "converts between pointers to integer
types with different sign". This patch changes that portion to read
instead as "converts between pointers to integer types where one is of
the unique plain 'char' type and the other is not" when one of the types
is plain `char`.
C17 subclause 6.5.16.1 indicates that the conversions resulting in
`-Wpointer-sign` warnings in assignment-like contexts are constraint
violations. This means that strict conformance requires a diagnostic for
the case where the message text is wrong before this patch. The lack of
an even more specialized warning group is consistent with GCC.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93999
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb' that prevents the function
from calling other functions without the same attribute. This allows
isolating code that's considered to be somehow privileged so that it could not
use its privileges to exhibit arbitrary behavior.
Introduce an on-by-default warning '-Wtcb-enforcement' that warns
about violations of the above rule.
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb_leaf' that suppresses
the new warning within the function it is attached to. Such leaf functions
may implement common functionality between the trusted and the untrusted code
but they require extra careful audit with respect to their capabilities.
Fixes after a revert in 419ef38a50293c58078f830517f5e305068dbee6:
Fix a test.
Add workaround for GCC bug (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67274).
Attribute the patch appropriately!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91898
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb' that prevents the function
from calling other functions without the same attribute. This allows
isolating code that's considered to be somehow privileged so that it could not
use its privileges to exhibit arbitrary behavior.
Introduce an on-by-default warning '-Wtcb-enforcement' that warns
about violations of the above rule.
Introduce a function attribute 'enforce_tcb_leaf' that suppresses
the new warning within the function it is attached to. Such leaf functions
may implement common functionality between the trusted and the untrusted code
but they require extra careful audit with respect to their capabilities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91898
This patch renames PackStack and related variable names to also contain align across Clang.
As it is right now, Clang already uses one stack to record the information from both #pragma
align and #pragma pack. Leaving it as PackStack is confusing, and could cause people to
ignore #pragma align when developing code that interacts with PackStack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93901
We supports SjLj exception handling in the backend, so changing
clang to allow lowering using SjLj exceptions. Update a regression
test also.
Reviewed By: simoll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94076
We currently reject this valid C construct by claiming it declares a
non-local variable: for (struct { int i; } s={0}; s.i != 0; s.i--) ;
We expected all declaration in the clause-1 declaration statement to be
a local VarDecl, but there can be other declarations involved such as a
tag declaration. This fixes PR35757.
Joshua Haberman