macOS
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Also delete the non-functional `cfree` wrapper for Windows, to fix the
test cases on that platform.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc, rnk
Subscribers: timurrrr, eugenis, hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293536
This reverts r293337, which breaks tests on Windows:
malloc-no-intercept-499eb7.o : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _mallinfo referenced in function _main
llvm-svn: 293346
Summary:
In https://bugs.freebsd.org/215125 I was notified that some configure
scripts attempt to test for the Linux-specific `mallinfo` and `mallopt`
functions by compiling and linking small programs which references the
functions, and observing whether that results in errors.
FreeBSD and macOS do not have the `mallinfo` and `mallopt` functions, so
normally these tests would fail, but when sanitizers are enabled, they
incorrectly succeed, because the sanitizers define interceptors for
these functions. This also applies to some other malloc-related
functions, such as `memalign`, `pvalloc` and `cfree`.
Fix this by not intercepting `mallinfo`, `mallopt`, `memalign`,
`pvalloc` and `cfree` for FreeBSD and macOS, in all sanitizers.
Reviewers: emaste, kcc
Subscribers: hans, joerg, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27654
llvm-svn: 293337
Breaks tests on i686/Linux due to missing clang driver support:
error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=leak' for target 'i386-unknown-linux-gnu'
llvm-svn: 292844
People keep asking LSan to be available on 32 bit targets (e.g. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/403)
despite the fact that false negative ratio might be huge (up to 85%). This happens for big real world applications
that may contain random binary data (e.g. browser), but for smaller apps situation is not so terrible and LSan still might be useful.
This patch adds initial support for x86 Linux (disabled by default), ARM32 is in TODO list.
We used this patch (well, ported to GCC) on our 32 bit mobile emulators and it worked pretty fine
thus I'm posting it here to initiate further discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28609
llvm-svn: 292775
Thread stack/TLS may be stored by libpthread for future reuse after
thread destruction, and the linked list it's stored in doesn't
even hold valid pointers to the objects, the latter are calculated
by obscure pointer arithmetic.
With this change applied, LSan test suite passes with
"use_ld_allocations" flag defaulted to "false". It still requires more
testing to check if the default can be switched.
llvm-svn: 257975
Summary:
We have a way to keep track of allocated DTLS segments: let's use it
in LSan. Although this code is fragile and relies on glibc
implementation details, in some cases it proves to be better than
existing way of tracking DTLS in LSan: marking as "reachable" all
memory chunks allocated directly by "ld".
The plan is to eventually get rid of the latter, once we are sure
it's safe to remove.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16164
llvm-svn: 257785
- Trim spaces.
- Use nullptr in place of 0 for pointer variables.
- Use '!p' in place of 'p == 0' for null pointer checks.
- Add blank lines to separate function definitions.
- Add 'extern "C"' or 'namespace foo' comments after the appropriate
closing brackets
This is a continuation of work from 409b7b82. The focus here is on the
various sanitizers (not sanitizer_common, as before).
Patch by Eugene Zelenko!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13225
llvm-svn: 248966
Summary: I've copy/pasted the LLVM_NOEXCEPT definition macro goo from LLVM's Compiler.h. Is there somewhere I should put this in Compiler RT? Is there a useful header to define/share things like this?
Reviewers: samsonov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11780
llvm-svn: 244453
In the current scheme of things, the call to ThreadStart() in the child
thread is not synchronized with the parent thread. So, if a pointer is passed to
pthread_create, there may be a window of time during which this pointer will not
be discoverable by LSan. I.e. the pthread_create interceptor has already
returneed and thus the pointer is no longer on the parent stack, but we don't
yet know the location of the child stack. This has caused bogus leak reports
(see http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21621/).
This patch makes the pthread_create interceptor wait until the child thread is
properly registered before returning.
llvm-svn: 223419
MSanDR is a dynamic instrumentation tool that can instrument the code
(prebuilt libraries and such) that could not be instrumented at compile time.
This code is unused (to the best of our knowledge) and unmaintained, and
starting to bit-rot.
llvm-svn: 222232
The interceptors had code that after macro expansion ended up looking like
extern "C" void memalign()
__attribute__((weak, alias("__interceptor_memalign")));
extern "C" void __interceptor_memalign() {}
extern "C" void __interceptor___libc_memalign()
__attribute__((alias("memalign")));
That is,
* __interceptor_memalign is a function
* memalign is a weak alias to __interceptor_memalign
* __interceptor___libc_memalign is an alias to memalign
Both gcc and clang produce assembly that look like
__interceptor_memalign:
...
.weak memalign
memalign = __interceptor_memalign
.globl __interceptor___libc_memalign
__interceptor___libc_memalign = memalign
What it means in the end is that we have 3 symbols pointing to the
same position in the file, one of which is weak:
8: 0000000000000000 1 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1
__interceptor_memalign
9: 0000000000000000 1 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 1 memalign
10: 0000000000000000 1 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 1
__interceptor___libc_memalign
In particular, note that __interceptor___libc_memalign will always
point to __interceptor_memalign, even if we do link in a strong symbol
for memalign. In fact, the above code produces exactly the same binary
as
extern "C" void memalign()
__attribute__((weak, alias("__interceptor_memalign")));
extern "C" void __interceptor_memalign() {}
extern "C" void __interceptor___libc_memalign()
__attribute__((alias("__interceptor_memalign")));
If nothing else, this patch makes it more obvious what is going on.
llvm-svn: 204823
No longer allow interceptors to be called during initialization, use the preinit
array (instead of initializing at the first call to an intercepted function) and
adopt the calloc() hack from ASan.
llvm-svn: 195642
Update the main thread's os_id on every pthread_create, and before
initiating leak checking. This ensures that we have the correct os_id even if we
have forked after Init().
llvm-svn: 185815
Francis Ricci