It seems to have been added back in 761e42fa3d for Clang to use it,
however it seems to have never been used for that purpose, so it is
probably fine to remove it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122330
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
Since we expect the condition to be true most of the time, we might
as well tell the compiler. And when assertions are disabled, we
might as well tell the compiler that it's allowed to assume that
the condition holds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122397
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
I suspect this is a remnant of the times when we were not comfortable
using Clang's C++11/14 extensions everywhere, but now we do, so we can
use _BoolConstant instead and get rid of the macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122351
In C++20 the type trait `type_identity` was introduced. For the same purpose there is `__identity` for pre-C++20 code. The name is confusing, because since C++20 there is also `identity`, which isn't a type trait.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122017
I audited all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT to make sure that we only used it
for "basic assertions", i.e. assertions with constant-time conditions.
I also audited all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT to make sure we used it
only for debug-mode assertions, and in one case had to change for
_LIBCPP_ASSERT instead.
As a fly-by, I also changed a couple of tests against nullptr or 0 to
be more explicit.
After this patch, all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT should be with constant-time
conditions, and all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT should be with conditions
that we only want to check when the debug mode is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122395
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626 for details -- this re-enables the
CTAD we removed, since it does break some stuff as well (even though it's
not nearly as bad as the removed constructors fixed by D121626).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122184
Addresses LWG 3548 which mandates that when shared_ptr is being constructed from a unique_ptr, the unique_ptr's deleter should be moved and not copied.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119159
Changes in [P0896](https://wg21.link/p0896):
- add `disable_sized_sentinel_for`;
- add `iter_move` and `iter_swap`;
- add a `requires` clause to the `operator->`;
- add `iterator_concept`;
- check that the `Iterator` template parameter is a bidirectional
iterator;
- add constraints to all comparison operators;
- change the definitions of `iterator_category`, `value_type`,
`difference_type` and `reference` (changes to `iterator_category` were
already implemented).
Also add a few forgotten things to the `reverse_iterator` synopsis
(notably the spaceship operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180
In 7fb40e1569, I changed the availability for bad_optional_access and
friends from macOS 10.14 to 10.13 after conducting an investigation on
old dylibs. It turns out that macOS 10.13 did have bad_optional_access,
however the dylib on iOS didn't match the dylib on macOS, so those
exception classes were only introduced in iOS 12.
Thanks to Aditya Kumar for noticing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121735
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
Back in 3a208c6894, we implemented the range-based constructor for <span>.
However, in doing so, we removed a previous non-standard constructor that
we provided before shipping <ranges>. Unfortunately, that breaks code that
was relying on a range-based constructor until we ship all of <ranges>.
This patch reintroduces the old non-conforming constructors and tests
that were removed in 3a208c6894 and uses them whenever <ranges> is
not provided (e.g. in LLVM 14). This is only a temporary workaround
until we enable <ranges> by default in C++20, which should hopefully
happen by LLVM 15.
The goal is to cherry-pick this workaround back to the LLVM 14 release
branch, since I suspect the constructor removal may otherwise cause
breakage out there, like the breakage I saw internally.
We could have avoided this situation by waiting for C++20 to be finalized
before shipping std::span. For example, we could have guarded it with
something like _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES to prevent users from
accidentally starting to depend on it before it is stable. We did not
have these mechanisms when std::span was first implemented, though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626
The class `__dir_stream` is currently declared in two places: as a
top-level forward declaration in `directory_iterator.h`, and as a friend
declaration in class `directory_entry`, in `directory_entry.h`.
The former has a `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN` attribute, but the latter does not,
causing the Firefox build to complain about the visibility not matching
the previous declaration. This is because Firefox plays games with
pushing and popping visibility.
Work around this by making both `__dir_stream` declarations consistently
use `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121639
It turns out that the whole header is only enabled in C++20 and above,
so these checks were redundant (and always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121604
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
We don't need preprocessor logic to exclude those declarations when compiling for
the Windows App Store, because that is handled by using_if_exists now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108632
Instead of carrying around #ifdefs to determine whether those functions
are available on the platform, unconditionally use the using_if_exists
attribute to import it into namespace std only when available. That was
the purpose of this attribute from the start.
This change means that trying to use libc++ with an old SDK (or on an
old platform for platforms that ship system headers in /usr/include)
will require a recent Clang that supports the using_if_exists attribute.
When using an older Clang or GCC, the underlying platform has to support
a C11 standard library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108203
As a fly-by fix, also move it closer to where it is needed, and add a
comment explaining the existence of this weird function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121231
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
Based on review comments in D97705 applied some code cleanups in
<charconv>. The header now uses a more recent libc++ style.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121223
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
As a fly-by fix, enable the complexity-changing assertions in __debug_less
only when the full debug mode is enabled, since debugging level 0 is usually
understood to only contain basic assertions that do not change the complexity
of algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121129
Saves one move in each case, which is basically nothing perf-wise;
this is more about simplifying the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121130
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
Move `__quoted_output_proxy` into the one file that uses it.
A `const char*` has no associated traits class, so `std::quoted("literal")`
should be printable into any basic_ostream regardless of traits.
Use hidden-friend `operator<<` and `operator>>`, since we're permitted to.
(The exact signature is unspecified because the class itself is unspecified.)
We shouldn't support `std::quoted("literal")` in C++03 or C++11 mode.
(We do need `std::__quoted(s)` and `std::__quoted(cs)` in C++11 mode,
because they're used by `std::__fs::filesystem::path`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120135
Zero-sized types are a GCC extension, also supported by Clang.
In theory it's already invalid to `delete` a void pointer or a
pointer-to-incomplete, so we shouldn't need any special code
to catch those cases; but in practice Clang accepts both
constructs with just a warning, and GCC even accepts `sizeof(void)`
with just a warning! So we must keep the static_asserts.
The hard errors are tested in `unique_ptr_dltr_dflt/*.compile.fail.cpp`.
In ranges::begin/end, check `sizeof >= 0` instead of `sizeof != 0`,
so as to permit zero-sized types while still disallowing incomplete
types.
Fixes#54100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120633
This change makes the behavior of `<experimental/coroutine>` consistent with other headers that only work conditionally.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, ChuanqiXu, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119964
Previously, this test snippet would report incorrect information:
F::mask m;
std::wstring in(L"\u00DA"); // LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
f.is(in.data(), in.data() + 1, &m);
// m & F::lower would be set
The single-character version of the `is` function wasn't
affected by this issue though.
Define `_LIBCPP_CTYPE_MASK_IS_COMPOSITE_ALPHA` for Windows,
as the `alpha` / `_ALPHA` constant is a mask consisting of
multiple bits set, which avoids setting `alpha` whenver any
of the bits is set, in the `do_is` implementation.
On Windows, with the "C" locale, wchars are classified according
to their Unicode interpretation, just as in the en_US.UTF-8 locale on
all platforms.
Due to the differing classification of some characters, the
`scan_is` and `scan_not` tests are quite annoying to fix, thus just
ifdef out some of the tests for the "C" locale there - the code gets
tested with the more standard en_US.UTF-8 locale anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120796
Fixes LWG3656, "Inconsistent bit operations returning a count".
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3656
The fix has been approved for C++23 and left to vendors' discretion
in C++20 (but it sounds like everyone's on the same page that
of course it should be DR'ed back to C++20 too).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120444
This is slightly more user-visible than D119894, because the user is
expected to touch `__wrap_iter` directly. But the affected ctors are
non-public, so the user was never expected to be actually calling them.
And I didn't intentionally omit this from D119894; I just didn't
think of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120937
`basic_ios` delays initialization of `__fill_` to `widen(' ')` until `fill()` is called. But, `fill(char_type)` is missing this logic, so the fill character does not get initialized to whitespace if `fill(char_type)` is called first. This patch adds this logic to `fill(char_type)`.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120751
Using -isystem marks the headers as system headers, which means that we
don't actually get all the warnings that we'd normally get if we included
the headers as user headers.
The goal of the test suite is normally to mirror as closely as possible
how users would use the library. Technically, this change goes against
that philosophy, since users should be using `-isystem` (if they ever
need to specify the libc++ path explicitly, which should be a rare
occurence). However, I believe fishing out additional warnings from
the headers provides more value, hence this change. Ideally, we'd be
able to still use `-isystem`, but instruct Clang to still emit warnings
from the libc++ headers (e.g. we could tell Clang to emit warnings in
any file inside `<...>/usr/include/c++/v1`).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, #libc_abi
Spies: Mordante, EricWF, mstorsjo, mgorny, aheejin, arichardson, philnik, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118616
AIX's system header provides these C++ overloads for compatibility with
older XL C++ implementations, but they can be disabled by defining
__LIBC_NO_CPP_MATH_OVERLOADS__ since AIX 7.2 TL 5 SP 3.
Since D109078 landed clang will define this macro when using libc++ on
AIX and we already run the lit tests with it too. This change will
enable the overloads in libc++'s math.h and we'll continue to require
the compiler to define the macro going forward.
Reviewed By: ldionne, jsji, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102172
co-authored-by: Jason Liu <jasonliu.development@gmail.com>
Notably the following ctors remain non-explicit because they
are used as implicit conversions in too many places:
* __debug_less(_Compare&)
* __map_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __map_const_iterator(_TreeIterator)
* __hash_map_iterator(_HashIterator)
* __hash_map_const_iterator(_HashIterator)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119894
All supported compilers have implemented this feature.
Therefore use the language version instead of the feature macro.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119865
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
`uniform_int_distribution<T>` is UB unless `T` is one of the non-character,
non-boolean integer types (`short` or larger). However, libc++ has never
enforced this. D114129 accidentally made `uniform_int_distribution<bool>`
into an error. Make it now *intentionally* an error; and likewise for the
character types and all user-defined class and enum types; but permit
`__[u]int128_t` to continue working.
Apply the same static_assert to all the integer distributions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114920
This follows the general direction of D118736 that
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES` does *not* guard anything outside
of the `std::ranges::` namespace itself. This means we must permit
`ranges::less` etc. in no-ranges mode; that seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120139
`__addr_in_range` is a non-constexpr function, so we can't call it during constant evaluation.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, miscco
Spies: miscco, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119633
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
This patch marks the class _Flags as packed because the design assumes that it
is packed and a number of tests also assume that it is packed. However on AIX
the class is not packed unless it is marked as such.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, #libc, Mordante, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119567
It seems that we are using wchar_t in __estimate_column_width and assume that
it is a 32 bit type. However, on AIX 32 the size of wchar_t is only 16 bits.
Changed wchar_t to uint32_t since the variable is being passed to a function
that uses uint32_t anyway.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty, Mordante, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119770
This fixes instances of the newly added `-Wunqualified-std-cast-call`.
(Commit 7853371146 removed unqualified `move` from the tests,
but these unqualified `move`s remained undetected in the actual headers.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120509
Set std::numeric_limits<>::tinyness_before to true for floating point types on ARM platforms.
Section E1.3.5 in the ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual specifies:
Underflow. The bit is set to 1 if the absolute value of the result
of an operation, produced before rounding, is less than the minimum
positive normalized number for the destination precision, and the
rounded result is inexact.
Reviewed By: #libc, majnemer, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116338
This is the first step towards disentangling the debug mode and assertions
in libc++. This patch doesn't make any functional change: it simply moves
_LIBCPP_ASSERT-related stuff to its own file so as to make it clear that
libc++ assertions and the debug mode are different things. Future patches
will make it possible to enable assertions without enabling the debug
mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119769
The changes from the One Ranges Proposal amount to adding:
- a constructor that takes a `default_sentinel_t` and is equivalent to
the default constructor;
- an `operator==` that compares the iterator to `default_sentinel_t`.
The original proposal defined two overloads for `operator==` (different
argument order) as well as `operator!=`. This has been removed by
[P1614](https://wg21.link/p1614).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119620
Also, fix the actual code so that the test would pass if we fixed the
issue that the method is instantiated in the dylib, and hence the debug
assertion will never fire except if the debug mode is enabled when the
dylib is being compiled.
This should work now that we are using a matching libunwind.dylib when
we run the tests in back-deployment scenarios. The only restriction we
have now is to run on macOS x86_64, since that's what the old dylibs
were compiled for. This should allow us to move to newer AppleClangs
in the CI.
As a fly-by, fix missing availability annotations on optional's
monadic operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119840
As suggested in D117966.
These conditional noexcepts are *permitted* by the Standard (as long
as there were no mistakes in them, I guess); but not *mandated*.
The Standard doesn't put any noexcept-specifications on these member functions.
The same logic would apply to `transform_view::iterator::operator*`
and `transform_view::iterator::operator[]`, but the Standard mandates
conditional noexcept on `iter_move(transform_view::iterator)`, and
I think it doesn't make much sense to say "moving from this iterator
is conditionally noexcept but not-moving from it is noexcept(false),"
so I'm leaving transform_view alone for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119374
In src/, most files can use `constinit` directly because they're always
compiled with C++20. But some files, like "libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp",
can't, because they're `#include`d directly from test cases in libcxxabi/test/
and therefore must (currently) compile as C++03. We might consider refactoring
those offending tests, or at least marking them `UNSUPPORTED: c++03`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119264
The logic here is that we are disabling *only* things in `std::ranges::`.
Everything in `std::` is permitted, including `default_sentinel`, `contiguous_iterator`,
`common_iterator`, `projected`, `swappable`, and so on. Then, we include
anything from `std::ranges::` that is required in order to make those things
work: `ranges::swap`, `ranges::swap_ranges`, `input_range`, `ranges::begin`,
`ranges::iter_move`, and so on. But then that's all. Everything else (including
notably all of the "views" and the `std::views` namespace itself) is still
locked up behind `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118736
This makes the GCC output even cleaner!
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: mstorsjo, Quuxplusone, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119295
`<filesystem>` header has been around for a while now, so we can safely remove
`<experimental/filesystem>` header. `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM`
suggests we were going to remove `<experimental/filesystem>` in llvm 11 release,
but we never did. So, remove the experimental header now, its associated tests,
and the `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_EXPERIMENTAL_FILESYSTEM` macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119603
Despite the comment saying `[[no_unique_address]]` on the `__base_` data member
makes clang crash, this does not seem to be true on CI. So, mark `__base_` with
`_LIBCPP_NO_UNIQUE_ADDRESS`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119208
- add some test cases for `cbegin`/`cend`;
- make class definitions generally follow the order in which they are
used;
- add a missing include.
Reviewed By: philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119214
This reverts commit 2722ac65. As explained in D115906, this was actually
unnecessary and it broke the external threading configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119484
`ranges_swap_ranges.h` includes `<type_traits>` but does not use anything from
it. So, remove the include.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119491
`{back,front}_insert_iterator` and `ostream{,buf}_iterator` effectively
fully implement the One Ranges Proposal already, so mark them as done:
- the change to `difference_type` was made by D103273;
- default constructors and the associated default member initializers
were removed by wg21.link/P2325 (implemented by D102468).
Also fix a stale template signature in the `<iterator>` synopsis.
In libc++, checking specific `_LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL` levels is used everywhere except in `comp_ref_type.h`. `_LIBCPP_DEBUG` is meant as a user-facing option, and internally libc++ should be checking the value of `_LIBCPP_DEBUG_LEVEL`.
The definition of `std::__debug_less` doesn't need to be hidden behind the macro, we can unconditionally expose it. It will be unused by `__comp_ref_type` unless debug mode is enabled.
This was suggested in D118940.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118950
b07b5bd727 adds a use of `__comp_ref_type.h` to `std::min`. When libc++ is built with `-D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=0`, this enables `std::__debug_less`, which is only marked constexpr after c++17.
`std::min` itself is marked as being `constexpr` as of c++14, so by extension, `std::__debug_less` should also be marked `constexpr` for the same versions so that `std::min` can use it. This change lowers the guard from `> 17` to `> 11`.
Reproducer in godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/ans3TGsj8
```
constexpr int x() { return std::min<int>({1, 2, 3, 4}); }
static_assert(x() == 1);
```
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118940
Remove mentions of `experimental::function`, its operators, etc. They are no
longer in `experimental/functional`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119204
Previously, _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE would be used interchangeably with
_LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION >= 2. This was confusing and creating unnecessary
complexity.
This patch removes _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE -- instead, the LIBCXX_ABI_UNSTABLE
CMake option will result in the LIBCXX_ABI_VERSION being set to '2', the
current unstable ABI. As a result, in the code, we only have _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION
to check in order to query the current ABI version.
As a fly-by, this also defines the ABI namespace during CMake configuration
to reduce complexity in __config. I believe it was previously done this
way because we used to try to use __config_site as seldom as possible.
Now that we always ship a __config_site, it doesn't really matter and
I think being explicit about how the library is configured in the __config_site
is actually a feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119173
Some members are public but should be private. Nothing requires they are public
right now, so make them private.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119097
Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was an ABI break. We
still left a knob for users to turn it back on if they were broken by
the change, with a note that we would remove that knob after one release.
The time has now come to remove the knob and clean up the std::nullptr_t
emulation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114786
Some `__config` cleanup and `_LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE` should set `_LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION`, since the latest ABI version //is// the unstable ABI.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118989
Basically a rebase of D104980; most of that patch had already happened
via gradual drive-by changes, but this finishes it up.
Don't touch the inclusions from `<__functional_base>`, `<__hash_table>`,
or `<__locale>`; those could be removed if we propagated the
inclusions up to the includers of those files, but there are lots
of those includers.
`<algorithm>`, `<functional>`, and `<memory>` already include `<utility>`
at the top level. `<iterator>` did not, so I've added it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119020
var-const points out that `ranges::begin` is (non-normatively
but explicitly) always supposed to return a `std::input_or_output_iterator`,
and `Incomplete*` is not a `std::input_or_output_iterator` because it
has no `operator++`. Therefore, we should never return `Incomplete*`
from `ranges::begin(x)`, even when `x` is `Incomplete(&)[]`. Instead,
just SFINAE away.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118963
For some reason `<string>` defines `std::fpos`, which should be defined in `<ios>`.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118914
It looks like we added some checks to try and use builtin type traits
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67900, but some of those type traits are
never implemented as builtins, so this is essentially dead code.
Fixes llvm-project#53569
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118923
Discovered in the comments on D118748: we would like this namespace
to exist anytime Ranges exists, regardless of whether concepts syntax
is supported. Also, we'd like to fully granularize the <ranges> header,
which means not putting any loose declarations at the top level.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118809
Remove the vector base class as suggested by @ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117108
As per [time.duration.cons]/1, the constructor constraint should be on
const Rep2&. As it is now the code will fail to compile in certain
cases, for example (https://godbolt.org/z/c7fPrcTYM):
struct S{
operator int() const&& noexcept = delete;
operator int() const& noexcept;
};
const S &fun();
auto k = std::chrono::microseconds{fun()};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118902
Removing the base class of std::basic_string is not an ABI break, so we can remove any references to it from the header.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118733
Per Discord discussion, we're normalizing on a simple `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
so that we can do a big search-and-replace for `!defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS)`
back into `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17` when we're ready to abandon support for concept-syntax-less
compilers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118748
There is no practical difference between `_VSTD` and `std` so we should just remove `_VSTD`. This is the first step.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: jeroen.dobbelaere, wmaxey, EricWF, lebedev.ri, __simt__, dim, mgrang, sstefan1, wenlei, smeenai, libcxx-commits, #libc_vendors
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117811
In D117811 @Quuxplusone pointed out the friend declarations don't need
to be qualified. Removing the qualification should avoid needing to add
a GCC work-around when changing _VSTD to std.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, philnik, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118719
With this patch there should be no more namespaces without closing comment
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118668
The old `__regex_word` aliased the mask for `xdigit`, causing stray
test failures.
The diff may look surprising, as if the previous faulty value had
been set specifically for Windows - but this is due to a restructuring
in 411c630bae. Prior to that, there
were OS specific settings for some OSes, and one fallback used for
the rest (which turns out to not work for Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118188
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
Each "Nothing To Do" issue only changed nits in the English wording,
not anything to do with the code.
Each "Complete" issue was completed already, as far as I can tell.
I tried to err on the side of caution: I didn't mark a few issues
whose P/Rs were very invasive and would take time to verify, and I
didn't mark a lot of issues involving features we haven't even started
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117960
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
These were omitted in all Windows configurations, but it turns out
that they work just fine in MinGW mode.
This allows converting a couple cases of "XFAIL: LIBCXX-WINDOWS-FIXME"
into "XFAIL: msvc" as the bug is specific to MSVC mode (clang-cl).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118192
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
On targets that have limited atomic support, e.g. ones that define
ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE to '1' ("sometimes lock free"), we would end up
referencing yet-undefined __libcpp_{,un}signed_lock_free.
This commit adds a guard to prevent these references for such
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118391
In `ranges::advance(iter, n, bound)`, we'd incorrectly handle the case
where bound < iter and n is 0:
int a[10];
int *p = a+5;
int *bound = a+3;
std::ranges::advance(p, 0, bound);
assert(p - a == 5); // we'd return 3 before this patch
This was caused by an incorrect handling of 0 inside __magnitude_geq.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117240
We were missing a constraint in common_iterator's iterator_traits and
we were eagerly instantiating iter_value_t even when invalid.
Thanks to Casey Carter for finding this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117449
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
Remove a bunch of LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG. This is the result of a
rabbithole to re-eliminate the workaround I introduced into
std::cref in D117953. It turns out that Clang's C++03 mode
(the only compiler we care about C++03 for) now supports all
the things we were originally eschewing via LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG;
we can fully support these reference_wrapper features in
C++03 mode, and un-XFAIL the relevant tests.
Drive-by constexprify a few more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117974
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3422
Also add a static_assert to check the "Mandates:" on the
iterator-pair constructor. Oddly, the `InputIterator` parameter
itself is merely preconditioned, not constrained, to satisfy the
input iterator requirements.
Also drive-by rename `init` to `__init`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117962
Remove `std::basic_string`'s base class in ABI version 2
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116334
Since basic_string::reserve(n) is instantiated in the shared library but also
available to the compiler for inlining, its definition should not depend on
things like the Standard mode in use. Indeed, that flag may not match between
how the shared library is compiled and how users are compiling their own code,
resulting in ODR violations.
However, note that we retain the behavior of basic_string::reserve() to
shrink the string for backwards compatibility reasons. While it would
technically be conforming to not shrink, we believe user expectation is
for it to shrink, and so existing code might have been written based on
that assumption. We prefer to not break such code, even though that makes
basic_string::reserve() and basic_string::reserve(0) not equivalent anymore.
Fixes llvm-project#53170
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117332
This adjust the version macro and sets it as completed. All parts of the paper
have been implemented, except for the parts replaced by later papers and
LWG-issues.
Adjusted the synopsis to match the synopsis in the Standard. Not yet
implemented parts of P2216 and P2418 still use the P0645 wording.
Completes:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115991
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115999
This implements the handler according to P0645. P2418 changes the wording
in the Standard. That isn't implemented and requires changes in more
places. LWG3631 applies modifications to P2418, but is currently
unresolved.
Implements parts of:
* P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115989
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115991
[format.formatter.spec]/5 lists the requirements for the default
formatter. The original implementation didn't implement this. This
implements the default formatter according to the Standard.
This adds additional test to validate the default formatter is disabled
and the required standard formatters are enabled.
While adding the tests it seems the formatters needed a constraint for the
character types they were valid for.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115988
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115989
This implements the last required formatter specialization.
Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D114001
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988
This properly implements the formatter for floating-point types.
Completes:
- P1652R1 Printf corner cases in std::format
- LWG 3250 std::format: # (alternate form) for NaN and inf
- LWG 3243 std::format and negative zeroes
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114001
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_set>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117917
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
It was not in P0355R7, nor has it ever been so in a working draft.
Drive-by:
* tests should test something: fix loop bounds so initial value is not >= final value
* calender type streaming tests are useless - let's remove them
* don't declare printf, especially if you don't intend to use it
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117638
As prefigured in the comments on D115315.
This gives us one unified style for all niebloids,
and also simplifies the modulemap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116570
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
`T` is not a valid identifier for libc++ to use, use `_Tp` instead. Caught from D116957
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117582
This change is the basis for a further refactoring where I'm going to
split up the various implementations we have in __threading_support to
make that code easier to understand.
Note that I had to make __convert_to_timespec a template to break
circular dependencies. Concretely, we never seem to use it with anything
other than ::timespec, but I am wary of hardcoding that assumption as
part of this change, since I suspect there's a reason for going through
these hoops in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116944
This essentially reverts e02ed1c255 and puts in a new fix, which makes `path::iterator`
a true C++20 `bidirectional_iterator`, but downgrades it to an `input_iterator` in C++17.
Fixes#37852.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116489
Louis Dionne