This implements support for MS-specific __unaligned qualifier in functions and
makes the following test case both compile and mangle correctly:
struct S {
void f() __unaligned;
};
void S::f() __unaligned {
}
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20437
llvm-svn: 270834
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367 and PR27666.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103
llvm-svn: 269220
This patch implements __unaligned (MS extension) as a proper type qualifier
(before that, it was implemented as an ignored attribute).
It also fixes PR27367.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19654
llvm-svn: 268727
This patch implements __unaligned as a type qualifier; before that, it was
modeled as an attribute. Proper mangling of __unaligned is implemented as well.
Some OpenCL code/tests are tangenially affected, as they relied on existing
number and sizes of type qualifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18596
llvm-svn: 266415
We permit implicit conversion from pointer-to-function to
pointer-to-object when -fms-extensions is specified. This is rather
unfortunate, move this into -fms-compatibility and only permit it within
system headers unless -Wno-error=microsoft-cast is specified.
llvm-svn: 251738
Microsoft's ATL headers make use of this MSVC extension, add support for
it and issue a diagnostic under -Wmicrosoft-exception-spec.
This fixes PR25265.
llvm-svn: 250854
With -fms-extensions it is possible to have a non-class record that is a
template specialization cause an assertion failure via the call to
Type::getAsCXXRecordDecl. Fixes PR 24246.
llvm-svn: 249090
This CL has caused bootstrap failures on Linux and OSX buildbots running with -Werror.
Example report from http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/13183/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio:
================================================================
[ 91%] Building CXX object tools/clang/tools/diagtool/CMakeFiles/diagtool.dir/ShowEnabledWarnings.cpp.o
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp:20:
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h:19:
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIInstrInfo.h:71:8: error: 'getLdStBaseRegImmOfs' overrides a member function but is not marked 'override' [-Werror,-Winconsistent-missing-override]
bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:815:16: note: overridden virtual function is here
virtual bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
^
================================================================
llvm-svn: 218969
for an overriding method if class has at least one
'override' specified on one of its methods.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor. rdar://18295240
(I have already checked in all llvm files with missing 'override'
methods and Bob Wilson has fixed a TableGen of FastISel so
no warnings are expected from build of llvm after this patch.
I have already verified this).
llvm-svn: 218925
The relevant portion of C++ standard says [namespace.memdef]p3:
If the name in a friend declaration is neither qualified nor a
template-id and the declaration is a function or an
elaborated-type-specifier, the lookup to determine whether the entity
has been previously declared shall not consider any scopes outside the
innermost enclosing namespace.
MSVC does not implement that rule for types. If there is a type in an
enclosing namespace, they consider an unqualified tag declaration with
the same name to be a redeclaration of the type from another namespace.
Implementing compatibility is a simple matter of disabling our
implementation of this rule for types, which was added in r177473.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4443
llvm-svn: 212784
CL permits static redeclarations to follow extern declarations. The
storage specifier on the latter declaration has no effect.
This fixes PR20034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4149
llvm-svn: 211238
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
It was previously enabled in both but should only have been part of the drop-in
quirks mode that is 'MicrosoftMode' given that it's only useful for
compatibility with the Microsoft headers/runtime.
llvm-svn: 198548
MSVC applies these to the following declaration only if present, otherwise
silently ignores them whereas we'll issue a warning.
Handling differs from ordinary attributes appearing in the same place, so add a
Sema test to make sure we get it right.
llvm-svn: 195577
Summary: Some MS headers use these features.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1948
llvm-svn: 192936
r177473 made us correctly consider only those declarations in the
enclosing namespace scope when looking for a friend declaration. Under
ms-extensions mode, where we do some level of friend injection, this
meant that we were introducing a new tag type into a different scope
than what Microsoft actually does. Address this by only doing the
friend injection when we didn't see any tag with that name in any
outer scope. Fixes <rdar://problem/14250378>.
llvm-svn: 185100
This became allowed by accident in r131201, but triggers an assert.
That patch added an exception to allow conversion from pointers to
narrow integral types for MSVC compatibility. However, a pointer can
already be converted to bool in a civilized manner; allowing conversion
via reinterpret_cast is a bad idea.
Fixes PR16222.
llvm-svn: 183394
references. What's more, they use this language extension in their
ATL header files (which come as part of MFC and the Win32 SDK). This patch implements support for the Microsoft extension, and addresses PR13737.
llvm-svn: 182936
MSVC accepts this:
class A {
A::A();
};
Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors. This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions. This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
A::A();
~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
After:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
A::A();
~~~^
1 error generated.
Patch by Jason Haslam.
llvm-svn: 174980
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
Example:
class A { public: int f(); };
class B : public A { private: using A::f; };
class C : public B { private: using B::f; };
Here, B::f is private so this should fail in Standard C++, but because B::f refers to A::f which is public MSVC accepts it.
This fixes 1 error when parsing MFC code with clang.
llvm-svn: 131896
template<class U>
struct X1 {
template<class T> void f(T*);
template<> void f(int*) { }
};
Won't be so simple. I need to think more about it.
llvm-svn: 131362
Andrey Bokhanko