The code that builds the dependence graph assumes that two PseudoSourceValues
don't alias. In a tail calling function two FixedStackObjects might refer to the
same location. Worse 'immutable' fixed stack objects like function arguments are
not immutable and will be clobbered.
Change this so that a load from a FixedStackObject is not invariant in a tail
calling function and don't return a PseudoSourceValue for an instruction in tail
calling functions when building the dependence graph so that we handle function
arguments conservatively.
Fix for PR23459.
rdar://20740035
llvm-svn: 236916
This new class in a global context contain arch-specific knowledge in order
to provide LLVM libraries, tools and projects with the ability to understand
the architectures. For now, only FPU, ARCH and ARCH extensions on ARM are
supported.
Current behaviour it to parse from free-text to enum values and back, so that
all users can share the same parser and codes. This simplifies a lot both the
ASM/Obj streamers in the back-end (where this came from), and the front-end
parsers for command line arguments (where this is going to be used next).
The previous implementation, using .def/.h includes is deprecated due to its
inflexibility to be built without the backend support and for being too
cumbersome. As more architectures join this scheme, and as more features of
such architectures are added (such as hardware features, type sizes, etc) into
a full blown TargetDescription class, having a set of classes is the most
sane implementation.
The ultimate goal of this refactor both LLVM's and Clang's target description
classes into one unique interface, so that we can de-duplicate and standardise
the descriptions, as well as make it available for other front-ends, tools,
etc.
The FPU parsing for command line options in Clang has been converted to use
this new library and a number of aliases were added for compatibility:
* A bogus neon-vfpv3 alias (neon defaults to vfp3)
* armv5/v6
* {fp4/fp5}-{sp/dp}-d16
Next steps:
* Port Clang's ARCH/EXT parsing to use this library.
* Create a TableGen back-end to generate this information.
* Run this TableGen process regardless of which back-ends are built.
* Expose more information and rename it to TargetDescription.
* Continue re-factoring Clang to use as much of it as possible.
llvm-svn: 236900
Refactored parts of the hardware loop pass to generate
more. Also, added more tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9568
llvm-svn: 236896
A trunc from i32 to i1 on x86_64 generates an instruction such as
%vreg19<def> = COPY %vreg9:sub_8bit<kill>; GR8:%vreg19 GR32:%vreg9
However, the copy here should only have the kill flag on the 32-bit path, not the 64-bit one.
Otherwise, we are killing the source of the truncate which could be used later in the program.
llvm-svn: 236890
This changes the shape of the statepoint intrinsic from:
@llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(anyptr target, i32 # call args, i32 unused, ...call args, i32 # deopt args, ...deopt args, ...gc args)
to:
@llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(anyptr target, i32 # call args, i32 flags, ...call args, i32 # transition args, ...transition args, i32 # deopt args, ...deopt args, ...gc args)
This extension offers the backend the opportunity to insert (somewhat) arbitrary code to manage the transition from GC-aware code to code that is not GC-aware and back.
In order to support the injection of transition code, this extension wraps the STATEPOINT ISD node generated by the usual lowering lowering with two additional nodes: GC_TRANSITION_START and GC_TRANSITION_END. The transition arguments that were passed passed to the intrinsic (if any) are lowered and provided as operands to these nodes and may be used by the backend during code generation.
Eventually, the lowering of the GC_TRANSITION_{START,END} nodes should be informed by the GC strategy in use for the function containing the intrinsic call; for now, these nodes are instead replaced with no-ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9501
llvm-svn: 236888
Improved the AnalyzeBranch, InsertBranch, and RemoveBranch
functions in order to handle more of our branch instructions.
This requires changes to analyzeCompare and PredicateInstructions.
Specifically, we've added support for new value compare jumps,
improved handling of endloop, added more compare instructions,
and improved support for predicate instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9559
llvm-svn: 236876
The function 'getTargetShuffleMask' already knows how to deal with PSHUFB nodes
where the mask node is a load from constant pool, and the constant pool node
is wrapped by a X86ISD::Wrapper node. This patch extends that logic by teaching
it how to also look through X86ISD::WrapperRIP.
This helps function combineX86ShufflesRecusively to combine more shuffle
sequences containing PSHUFB nodes if we are in RIPRel PIC mode.
Before this change, llc (with -relocation-model=pic -march=x86-64) was unable
to decode a pshufb where the mask was loaded from a constant pool. For example,
the no-op shuffle from test 'x86-fold-pshufb.ll' was not folded into its
operand, so instead of generating a single 'movaps' the backend always
generated a sub-optimal 'movdqa + pshufb' sequence.
Added test x86-fold-pshufb.ll.
llvm-svn: 236863
Summary:
In microMIPS, labels need to know whether they are on code or data. This is
indicated with STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS and can be inferred by being followed
by instructions. For empty basic blocks, we can ensure this by emitting the
.insn directive after the label.
Also, this fixes some failures in our out-of-tree microMIPS buildbots, for the
exception handling regression tests under: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9530
llvm-svn: 236815
We were accidentally folding a sign/zero extend in to address arithmetic in a different BB when the extend wasn't available there.
Cross BB fast-isel isn't safe, so restrict this to only when the extend is in the same BB as the use.
llvm-svn: 236764
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9440
It adds a new register class to the PPC back end to contain single precision
values in VSX registers. Additionally, it adds scalar loads and stores for
VSX registers.
llvm-svn: 236755
This is a follow-on to r236740 where I took Andrea's advice
in D9504 to remove a redundant pattern...except that I removed
the wrong pattern!
AFAICT, there is no change in the final code produced because
subsequent passes would clean up the extra instructions created
by the more complicated pattern.
llvm-svn: 236743
Finish the job that was abandoned in D6958 following the refactoring in
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL230221:
1. Uncomment the intrinsic def for the AVX r_Int instruction.
2. Add missing r_Int entries to the load folding tables; there are already
tests that check these in "test/Codegen/X86/fold-load-unops.ll", so I
haven't added any more in this patch.
3. Add patterns to solve PR21507 ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21507 ).
So instead of this:
movaps %xmm0, %xmm1
rcpss %xmm1, %xmm1
movss %xmm1, %xmm0
We should now get:
rcpss %xmm0, %xmm0
And instead of this:
vsqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
vblendps $1, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm1[0],xmm0[1,2,3]
We should now get:
vsqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9504
llvm-svn: 236740
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9517
The separate header file allows to reuse the MIPS ABI flags structure
constants in other LLVM tools like the llvm-readobj.
No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 236732
Added intrinsics for the instructions. CC parameter of the intrinsics was changed from i8 to i32 according to the spec.
By Igor Breger (igor.breger@intel.com)
llvm-svn: 236714
Summary: This will enable the IAS to reject floating point instructions if soft-float is enabled.
Reviewers: dsanders, echristo
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, mpf
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9053
llvm-svn: 236713
When folding a load in to another instruction, we need to fix the class of the index register
Otherwise, it could be something like GR64 not GR64_NOSP and would fail the machine verifier.
llvm-svn: 236644
The patch disabled unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF==1 on x86 architecture,
by setting MaxInterleaveFactor to 1. Unrolling in loop vectorization pass may introduce
the cost of overflow check, memory boundary check and extra prologue/epilogue code when
regular unroller will unroll the loop another time. Disable it when VF==1 remove the
unnecessary cost on x86. The same can be done for other platforms after verifying
interleaving/memory bound checking to be not perf critical on those platforms.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9515
llvm-svn: 236613
With neon enabled, we reach SelectBinaryFPOp and are able to get registers for a <2 x double> add.
However, we shouldn't actually attempt arithmetic on it as ARMIselLowering says "v2f64 is legal so that QR subregs can be extracted as f64 elements, but neither Neon nor VFP support any arithmetic operations on it."
This commit disables SelectBinaryFPOp for any vector types. There's already a FIXME to try handle neon. Doing so would require fixing this conditional which isn't safe for vectors 'VT == MVT::f64 || VT == MVT::i64'
llvm-svn: 236609
The initial code drop for VSX swap optimization permitted the
optimization only when all operations in a web of related computation
are lane-insensitive. For some lane-sensitive operations, we can
still permit the optimization provided that we make adjustments to
those operations. This patch adds special handling for vector splats
so that their presence doesn't kill the optimization.
Vector splats are lane-sensitive since they identify by number a
vector element to be used as the source of a splat. When swap
optimizations take place, the desired vector element will move to the
opposite doubleword of the quadword vector. We thus replace the index
I by (I + N/2) % N, where N is the number of elements in the vector.
A new test case is added to test that swap optimization succeeds when
vector splats are present, and that the proper input element is used
as the source of the splat.
An ancillary change removes SH_BUILDVEC as one of the kinds of special
handling that may be required by VSX swap optimization. From
experience with GCC, I had expected to need some modifications for
vector build operations, but I did not find that to be the case.
llvm-svn: 236606
Since r234249, i1 are sext instead of zext; because of that, doing
"CMP rN, #0; IT EQ/NE" isn't correct anymore.
"TST #1" is the conservatively correct alternative - the tradeoff being
that it doesn't have a 16-bit encoding -, so use that instead.
llvm-svn: 236569
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
There are 2 structural changes here:
1. The main diff is that we're preparing to extend the optimization
flags to affect more than just binary SDNodes. Eg, IR intrinsics
( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21290 ) or non-binop nodes
that don't even exist in IR such as FMA, FNEG, etc.
2. The other change is that we're actually copying the FP fast-math-flags
from the IR instructions to SDNodes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8900
llvm-svn: 236546
The register set for LDMIA begins at offset 3, not 4. We were previously
missing the short encoding of this instruction in the case where the base
register was the first register in the register set.
Also clean up some dead code:
- The isARMLowRegister check is redundant with what VerifyLowRegs does;
replace with an assert.
- Remove handling of LDMDB instruction, which has no short encoding (and
does not appear in ReduceTable).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9485
llvm-svn: 236535
This adds intrinsics to allow access to all of the z13 vector instructions.
Note that instructions whose semantics can be described by standard LLVM IR
do not get any intrinsics.
For each instructions whose semantics *cannot* (fully) be described, we
define an LLVM IR target-specific intrinsic that directly maps to this
instruction.
For instructions that also set the condition code, the LLVM IR intrinsic
returns the post-instruction CC value as a second result. Instruction
selection will attempt to detect code that compares that CC value against
constants and use the condition code directly instead.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236527
The ABI specifies that <1 x i128> and <1 x fp128> are supposed to be
passed in vector registers. We do not yet support those types, and
some infrastructure is missing before we can do so.
In order to prevent accidentally generating code violating the ABI,
this patch adds checks to detect those types and error out if user
code attempts to use them.
llvm-svn: 236526
The ABI allows sub-128 vectors to be passed and returned in registers,
with the vector occupying the upper part of a register. We therefore
want to legalize those types by widening the vector rather than promoting
the elements.
The patch includes some simple tests for sub-128 vectors and also tests
that we can recognize various pack sequences, some of which use sub-128
vectors as temporary results. One of these forms is based on the pack
sequences generated by llvmpipe when no intrinsics are used.
Signed unpacks are recognized as BUILD_VECTORs whose elements are
individually sign-extended. Unsigned unpacks can have the equivalent
form with zero extension, but they also occur as shuffles in which some
elements are zero.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236525
The z13 vector facility includes some instructions that operate only on the
high f64 in a v2f64, effectively extending the FP register set from 16
to 32 registers. It's still better to use the old instructions if the
operands happen to fit though, since the older instructions have a shorter
encoding.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236524
The architecture doesn't really have any native v4f32 operations except
v4f32->v2f64 and v2f64->v4f32 conversions, with only half of the v4f32
elements being used. Even so, using vector registers for <4 x float>
and scalarising individual operations is much better than generating
completely scalar code, since there's much less register pressure.
It's also more efficient to do v4f32 comparisons by extending to 2
v2f64s, comparing those, then packing the result.
This particularly helps with llvmpipe.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236523
This adds ABI and CodeGen support for the v2f64 type, which is natively
supported by z13 instructions.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236522
This the first of a series of patches to add CodeGen support exploiting
the instructions of the z13 vector facility. This patch adds support
for the native integer vector types (v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64).
When the vector facility is present, we default to the new vector ABI.
This is characterized by two major differences:
- Vector types are passed/returned in vector registers
(except for unnamed arguments of a variable-argument list function).
- Vector types are at most 8-byte aligned.
The reason for the choice of 8-byte vector alignment is that the hardware
is able to efficiently load vectors at 8-byte alignment, and the ABI only
guarantees 8-byte alignment of the stack pointer, so requiring any higher
alignment for vectors would require dynamic stack re-alignment code.
However, for compatibility with old code that may use vector types, when
*not* using the vector facility, the old alignment rules (vector types
are naturally aligned) remain in use.
These alignment rules are not only implemented at the C language level
(implemented in clang), but also at the LLVM IR level. This is done
by selecting a different DataLayout string depending on whether the
vector ABI is in effect or not.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236521
This patch adds support for the z13 processor type and its vector facility,
and adds MC support for all new instructions provided by that facilily.
Apart from defining the new instructions, the main changes are:
- Adding VR128, VR64 and VR32 register classes.
- Making FP64 a subclass of VR64 and FP32 a subclass of VR32.
- Adding a D(V,B) addressing mode for scatter/gather operations
- Adding 1-, 2-, and 3-bit immediate operands for some 4-bit fields.
Until now all immediate operands have been the same width as the
underlying field (hence the assert->return change in decode[SU]ImmOperand).
In addition, sys::getHostCPUName is extended to detect running natively
on a z13 machine.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236520
This reverts commit r236360.
This change exposed a bug in WinEHPrepare by opting win32 code into EH
preparation. We already knew that WinEHPrepare has bugs, and is the
status quo for x64, so I don't think that's a reason to hold off on this
change. I disabled exceptions in the sanitizer tests in r236505 and an
earlier revision.
llvm-svn: 236508
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
Arnold Schwaighofer