Summary:
The goal is to reduce false positives when the difference is intentional, like:
foo(StringRef name);
foo(StringRef name_ref) {
string name = cleanup(name_ref);
...
}
Or semantically unimportant, like:
foo(StringRef full_name);
foo(StringRef name) { ... }
There are other matching names we won't recognise (e.g. syns vs synonyms) but
this catches many that we see in practice, and gives people a systematic
workaround.
The old behavior is available as a 'Strict' option.
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49285
llvm-svn: 336992
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, piotrdz, hokein, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41716
llvm-svn: 321913
Summary:
The goal of the patch is to bring checkers in their appropriate namespace.
This path doesn't change any behavior.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19811
llvm-svn: 268264
This is first of series of patches, porting code from my project colobot-lint,
as I mentioned recently in cfe-dev mailing list.
This patch adds a new check in readability module:
readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name. I also added appropriate
testcases and documentation.
I chose readability module, as it seems it is the best place for it.
I think I followed the rules of LLVM coding guideline, but I may have missed
something, as I usually use other code formatting style.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12462
Patch by Piotr Dziwinski!
llvm-svn: 247261
Sam McCall