This is a fix to PR12778: in erroneous code an allocation function
can be declared with no arguments, quering the first argument in this case
causes assertion violation.
llvm-svn: 190751
This pass was based on the previous (essentially unused) profiling
infrastructure and the assumption that by ordering the basic blocks at
the IR level in a particular way, the correct layout would happen in the
end. This sometimes worked, and mostly didn't. It also was a really
naive implementation of the classical paper that dates from when branch
predictors were primarily directional and when loop structure wasn't
commonly available. It also didn't factor into the equation
non-fallthrough branches and other machine level details.
Anyways, for all of these reasons and more, I wrote
MachineBlockPlacement, which completely supercedes this pass. It both
uses modern profile information infrastructure, and actually works. =]
llvm-svn: 190748
Before:
template <template <typename>
class Fooooooo, template <typename>
class Baaaaaaar>
struct C {};
After:
template <template <typename> class Fooooooo,
template <typename> class Baaaaaaar>
struct C {};
llvm-svn: 190747
Summary:
We should treat a non-dependent template specialization like it wasn't
templated at all.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1554
llvm-svn: 190743
and a mach kernel in all the pages of the core file. If it finds
a user-process dyld binary, assume this is a user process that had
a copy of the mach kernel in memory when it crashed (e.g. lldb doing
kernel debugging) even though we found the kernel binary first.
Also, change the error messages about sections extending past the end
of the file to be warnings and make the messages sound less severe.
Most user process core files have one section that isn't included in
the file and there's no reason to worry people about that.
<rdar://problem/14473235>
llvm-svn: 190741
This is necessary when running two scan-build processes in parallel. The
directory naming scheme is now:
yyyy-MM-dd-HHmmss-PID-N
2013-09-13-174210-123-1
where "PID" is the scan-build process ID, and "N" is a sequential counter
(not likely to be needed now that seconds are mangled in, but just in case).
PR17196, using a suggested fix from Greg Czajkowski!
llvm-svn: 190735
-S : Specifies a command file which will get sourced after the ~/.lldbinit but before file arguments are processed
-O : Specifies a single (one-line) command that will get ditto
and
-s : Specifies a command file which will get sourced after `pwd`/.lldbinit
-o : Specifies a command file which ditto
I also changed it so that by default these sourced commands will print their command result, but there's a
-q option to change that if you wish.
llvm-svn: 190734
This was somewhat tricky because ~PrettyStackTraceEntry() may run after
llvm_shutdown() has been called. This is rare and only happens for a common idiom
used in the main() functions of command-line tools. This works around the idiom by
skipping the stack clean-up if the PrettyStackTraceHead ManagedStatic is not
constructed (i.e. llvm_shutdown() has been called).
llvm-svn: 190730
1. existing breakpoints weren't being re-resolved after the sections of a library were loaded (ie. through dlopen).
2. loaded sections weren't being removed after a shared library had been unloaded.
llvm-svn: 190727
Summary:
This fixes PR17145 and avoids unknown pragma warnings.
This change does not attempt to map MSVC warning numbers to clang
warning flags. Perhaps in the future we will implement a mapping for
some common subset of Microsoft warnings, but for now we don't.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1652
llvm-svn: 190726
There was a bug that if a section has an alignment requirement and there are
multiple symbols at offset 0 in the section, only the last atom at offset 0
would be aligned properly. That bug would move only the last symbol to an
alignment boundary, leaving other symbols unaligned, although they should be at
the same location. That caused a mysterious SEGV error of the resultant
executable.
With this patch, we manage all symbols at the same location properly, rather
than keeping the last one.
llvm-svn: 190724
Alignment(1) does not mean that the atom should be aligned on a 1 byte
boundary but on a 2^1 boundary. So, atoms without any specific alignment
requirements should have Alignment(0).
llvm-svn: 190723
Implements Instruction scheduler latencies for Silvermont,
using latencies from the Intel Silvermont Optimization Guide.
Auto detects SLM.
Turns on post RA scheduler when generating code for SLM.
llvm-svn: 190717
GCC ToT doesn't do this & it's worth about 3.2% on Clang's DWO file size
with Clang. Some or all of this may be due to things like r190715 which
could have source fixes/improvements, but it's not clear that's the case
and that doesn't help other source bases.
llvm-svn: 190716
Let me tell you a tale...
Within some twisted maze of debug info I've ended up implementing an
insane man's Include What You Use device. When the debugger emits debug
info it really shouldn't, I find out why & then realize the code could
be improved too.
In this instance CIndexDiagnostics.cpp had a lot more debug info with
Clang than GCC. Upon inspection a major culprit was all the debug info
describing clang::Sema. This was emitted because clang::Sema is
befriended by DiagnosticEngine which was rightly required, but GCC
doesn't emit debug info for friends so it never emitted anything for
Clang. Clang does emit debug info for friends (will be fixed/changed to
reduce debug info size).
But why didn't Clang just emit a declaration of Sema if this entire TU
didn't require a definition?
1) Diagnostic.h did the right thing, only using a declaration of Sema
and not including Sema.h at all.
2) Some other dependency of CIndexDiagnostics.cpp didn't do the right
thing. ASTUnit.h, only needing a declaration, still included Sema.h
(hence this commit which removes that include and adds the necessary
includes to the cpp files that were relying on this)
3) -flimit-debug-info didn't save us because of
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext, defined inline in Sema.h which fires
the "requiresCompleteType" check/flag (since it uses nested types from
Sema and calls Sema member functions) and thus, if debug info is ever
emitted for the type, the whole type is emitted and not just a
declaration.
Improving -flimit-debug-info to account for this would be... hard.
Modifying the code so that's not 'required to be complete' might be
possible, but probably only by moving EnterExpressionEvaluationContext
either into Sema, or out of Sema.h. That might be a bit too much of a
contortion to be bothered with.
Also, this is only one of the cases where emitting debug info for
friends caused us to emit a lot more debug info (this change reduces
Clang's DWO size by 0.93%, dropping friends entirely reduces debug info
by 3.2%) - I haven't hunted down the other cases, but I assume they
might be similar (Sema or something like it). IWYU or a similar tool
might help us reduce build times a bit, but analyzing debug info to find
these differences isn't worthwhile. I'll take the 3.2% win, provide this
small improvement to the code itself, and move on.
llvm-svn: 190715
By definition copies across register banks are not coalescable. Still, it may be
possible to get rid of such a copy when the value is available in another
register of the same register file.
Consider the following example, where capital and lower letters denote different
register file:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy b <-- cross-bank copy
This could have been optimized this way:
b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
...
C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
Note: b and C's definitions may be in different basic blocks.
This patch adds a peephole optimization that looks through a chain of copies
leading to a cross-bank copy and reuses a source that is on the same register
file if available.
This solution could also be used to get rid of some copies (e.g., A could have
been used instead of C). However, we do not do so because:
- It may over constrain the coloring of the source register for coalescing.
- The register allocator may not be able to find a nice split point for the
longer live-range, leading to more spill.
<rdar://problem/14742333>
llvm-svn: 190713
I now see no unexpected failures on FreeBSD on a local run of the test
suite.
llvm.org/pr17214
llvm.org/pr17225
llvm.org/pr17231
llvm.org/pr17232
llvm.org/pr17233
llvm-svn: 190709
Serge Pavlov