Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
The behavior from the original patch has changed, since we're no longer
allowing LLVM to just ignore the alignment. Instead, we're just
assuming the maximum possible alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824
llvm-svn: 374562
The test fails on Windows, with
error: 'warning' diagnostics expected but not seen:
File builtin-assume-aligned.c Line 62: requested alignment
must be 268435456 bytes or smaller; assumption ignored
error: 'warning' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File builtin-assume-aligned.c Line 62: requested alignment
must be 8192 bytes or smaller; assumption ignored
llvm-svn: 374456
Code to handle __builtin_assume_aligned was allowing larger values, but
would convert this to unsigned along the way. This patch removes the
EmitAssumeAligned overloads that take unsigned to do away with this
problem.
Additionally, it adds a warning that values greater than 1 <<29 are
ignored by LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824
llvm-svn: 374450
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<VectorType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373478
It shouldn't really be inlined into the EmitCheckedInBoundsGEP().
Refactoring it beforehand will make follow-up changes more obvious.
This was originally part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 371207
Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r363337, reverted in r363352.
llvm-svn: 363429
Revert 363340 "Remove unused SK_LValueToRValue initialization step."
Revert 363337 "PR23833, DR2140: an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion on a glvalue of type"
Revert 363295 "C++ DR712 and others: handle non-odr-use resulting from an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to a member access or similar not-quite-trivial lvalue expression."
llvm-svn: 363352
nullptr_t does not access memory.
We now reuse CK_NullToPointer to represent a conversion from a glvalue
of type nullptr_t to a prvalue of nullptr_t where necessary.
This reinstates r345562, reverted in r346065, now that CodeGen's
handling of non-odr-used variables has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 363337
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
This patch includes the necessary code for converting between a fixed point type and integer.
This also includes constant expression evaluation for conversions with these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56900
llvm-svn: 355462
I think the author of the function assumed that `GetInsertBlock()`
wouldn't change from where `atomicPHI` was created, but this isn't
true when `-fsanitize=unsigned-integer-overflow` is enabled (we
generate an overflow/continuation label). Fix by keeping track of the
block we want to return to to complete the cmpxchg loop.
rdar://48406558
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58744
llvm-svn: 355054
This patch implements fixed point comparisons with other fixed point types and
integers. This also provides constant expression evaluation for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57219
llvm-svn: 354621
Emit{Nounwind,}RuntimeCall{,OrInvoke} have been modified to take a
FunctionCallee as an argument, and CreateRuntimeFunction has been
modified to return a FunctionCallee. All callers have been updated.
Additionally, CreateBuiltinFunction is removed, as it was redundant
with CreateRuntimeFunction after some previous changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57668
llvm-svn: 353184
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch covers subtraction between fixed point types and other fixed point
types or integers, using the conversion rules described in 4.1.4 of N1169.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55844
llvm-svn: 351371
This patch covers addition between fixed point types and other fixed point
types or integers, using the conversion rules described in 4.1.4 of N1169.
Usual arithmetic rules do not apply to binary operations when one of the
operands is a fixed point type, and the result of the operation must be
calculated with the full precision of the operands, so we should not perform
any casting to a common type.
This patch does not include constant expression evaluation for addition of
fixed point types. That will be addressed in another patch since I think this
one is already big enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53738
llvm-svn: 351364
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351105
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
As reported by @regehr (thanks!) on twitter (https://twitter.com/johnregehr/status/1057681496255815686),
we (me) has completely forgot about the binary assignment operator.
In AST, it isn't represented as separate `ImplicitCastExpr`'s,
but as a single `CompoundAssignOperator`, that does all the casts internally.
Which means, out of these two, only the first one is diagnosed:
```
auto foo() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c = c + 1;
return c;
}
auto bar() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
https://godbolt.org/z/JNyVc4
This patch does handle the `CompoundAssignOperator`:
```
int main() {
unsigned char c = 255;
c += 1;
return c;
}
```
```
$ ./bin/clang -g -fsanitize=integer /tmp/test.c && ./a.out
/tmp/test.c:3:5: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'int' of value 256 (32-bit, signed) to type 'unsigned char' changed the value to 0 (8-bit, unsigned)
#0 0x2392b8 in main /tmp/test.c:3:5
#1 0x7fec4a612b16 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x22b16)
#2 0x214029 in _start (/build/llvm-build-GCC-release/a.out+0x214029)
```
However, the pre/post increment/decrement is still not handled.
Reviewers: rsmith, regehr, vsk, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, regehr
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53949
llvm-svn: 347258
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
This patch breaks Index/opencl-types.cl LIT test:
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; stage1/bin/c-index-test -test-print-type llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl -cl-std=CL2.0 | stage1/bin/FileCheck llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl
--
Command Output (stderr):
--
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:3:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp16' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:4:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_fp64' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:8:9: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:11:8: error: declaring variable of type 'half' is not allowed
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:15:3: error: use of type 'double' requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:16:3: error: use of type 'double4' (vector of 4 'double' values) requires cl_khr_fp64 extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:26:26: warning: unsupported OpenCL extension 'cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing' - ignoring [-Wignored-pragmas]
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:35:44: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:36:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:37:49: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/opencl-types.cl:38:54: error: use of type '__read_only image2d_array_msaa_depth_t' requires cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing extension to be enabled
llvm-svn: 346338
This exposes a (known) CodeGen bug: it can't cope with emitting lvalue
expressions that denote non-odr-used but usable-in-constant-expression
variables. See PR39528 for a testcase.
Reverted for now until that issue can be fixed.
llvm-svn: 346065
The goal is to use `emitConstant` in more places. Didn't move
`ComplexExprEmitter::emitConstant` because it returns a different type.
Reviewers: rjmccall, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: dexonsmith, erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53725
llvm-svn: 345897
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
Nico Weber