Add file-level comments
Delete insignificant addresses to make them more tolerant to layout changes
Simplify test output
Delete weak-undef-val.s - covered by relocation-undefined-weak.s
Delete weak-undef-export.s - covered by additional test added to weak-undef.s
Delete version-undef-sym.s - covered by undefined-versioned-symbol.s => version-symbol-undef.s
Delete symbol-ordering-file2.s - covered by symbol-ordering-file.s
Delete gotpcrelx.s - covered by gotpc-relax-und-dso.s => x86-64-gotpc-relax-und-dso.s
llvm-svn: 371299
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
llvm-readobj currently has a bug (see PR40097) where it prints '@' at
the end of unversioned dynamic symbols. This bug will be fixed in a
separate later commit, but these tests need fixing first.
Reviewed by: ruiu, Higuoxing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56388
llvm-svn: 350614
This fixes pr34301.
As the bug points out, we want to keep some relocations with undefined
weak symbols. This means that we cannot always claim that these
symbols are not preemptible as we do now.
Unfortunately, we cannot also just always claim that they are
preemptible. Doing so would, for example, cause us to try to create a
plt entry when we don't even have a dynamic symbol table.
What almost works is to say that weak undefined symbols are
preemptible if and only if we have a dynamic symbol table. Almost
because we don't want to fail the build trying to create a copy
relocation to a weak undefined.
llvm-svn: 313372
Fangrui Song