This is a case missed by D64136. If %t1.o has a weak reference on foo,
and %t2.so has a non-weak reference on foo:
```
0. ld.lld %t1.o %t2.so # ok; STB_WEAK; accepted since D64136
1. ld.lld %t2.so %t1.o # undefined symbol: foo; STB_GLOBAL
2. gold %t1.o %t2.so # ok; STB_WEAK
3. gold %t2.so %t1.o # undefined reference to 'foo'; STB_GLOBAL
4. ld.bfd %t1.o %t2.so # undefined reference to `foo'; STB_WEAK
5. ld.bfd %t2.so %t1.o # undefined reference to `foo'; STB_WEAK
```
It can be argued that in both cases, the binding of the undefined foo
should be set to STB_WEAK, because the binding should not be affected by
referenced from shared objects.
--allow-shlib-undefined doesn't suppress errors (3,4,5), but -shared or
--noinhibit-exec allows ld.bfd/gold to produce a binary:
```
3. gold -shared %t2.so %t1.o # ok; STB_GLOBAL
4. ld.bfd -shared %t2.so %t1.o # ok; STB_WEAK
5. ld.bfd -shared %t1.o %t1.o # ok; STB_WEAK
```
If %t2.so has DT_NEEDED entries, ld.bfd will load them (lld/gold don't
have the behavior). If one of the DSO defines foo and it is in the
link-time search path (e.g. DT_NEEDED entry is an absolute path, via
-rpath=, via -rpath-link=, etc),
`ld.bfd %t1.o %t2.so` and `ld.bfd %t1.o %t2.so` will not error.
In this patch, we make Undefined and SharedSymbol share the same binding
computing logic. Case 1 will be allowed:
```
0. ld.lld %t1.o %t2.so # ok; STB_WEAK; accepted since D64136
1. ld.lld %t2.so %t1.o # ok; STB_WEAK; changed by this patch
```
In the future, we can explore the option that turns both (0,1) into
errors if --no-allow-shlib-undefined (default when linking an
executable) is in action.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65584
llvm-svn: 368038
If %t1.o has a weak reference on foo, and %t2.so has a non-weak
reference on foo: `ld.lld %t1.o %t2.so -o %t`
We incorrectly set the binding of the undefined foo to STB_GLOBAL.
Fix this by ignoring undefined symbols in a SharedFile for Undefined and
SharedSymbol.
This fixes the binding of pthread_once when the program links against
both librt.so and libpthread.so
```
a.o: STB_WEAK reference to pthread_once
librt.so: STB_GLOBAL reference to pthread_once # should be ignored
libstdc++.so: STB_WEAK reference to pthread_once # should be ignored
libgcc_s.so.1: STB_WEAK reference to pthread_once # should be ignored
```
The STB_GLOBAL pthread_once issue (not fixed by D63974) can cause a link error when the result
DSO is used to link another DSO with -z defs if -lpthread is not specified. (libstdc++.so.6 not having a dependency on libpthread.so is a really nasty hack...)
We happened to create a weak undef before D63974 because libgcc_s.so.1
was linked the last and it changed the binding again to weak.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64136
llvm-svn: 365129
Fixes PR42442
t.o has a STB_GLOBAL undef ref to f
t2.so has a STB_WEAK undef ref to f
t1.so defines f
ld.lld t.o t1.so t2.so currently sets the binding of `f` to STB_WEAK.
This is not correct because there exists a STB_GLOBAL undef ref from a
regular object. The problem is that resolveUndefined() doesn't check
if the undef ref is seen for the first time:
if (isShared() || isLazy() || (isUndefined() && Other.Binding != STB_WEAK))
Binding = Other.Binding;
The isShared() condition should be `isShared() && !Referenced`
where Referenced is set to true after an undef ref is seen.
In practice, when linking a pthread program with glibc:
// a.o
#include <pthread.h>
pthread_mutex_t mu = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
int main() { pthread_mutex_unlock(&mu); }
{clang,gcc} -fuse-ld=lld a.o -lpthread # libpthread.so is linked before libgcc_s.so.1
The weak undef pthread_mutex_unlock in libgcc_s.so.1 makes the result
weak, which diverges from GNU linkers where STB_DEFAULT is used:
23: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT UND pthread_mutex_lock
(Note, if -pthread is used instead, libpthread.so will be linked **after**
libgcc_s.so.1 . lld sets the binding to the expected STB_GLOBAL)
Similar linking sequences (ld.lld t.o t1.so t2.so) appear to be used by
Go, which cause a build error https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31912.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63974
llvm-svn: 364913
Also change some options that have different semantics (cause confusion) in llvm-readelf mode:
-s => -S
-t => --symbols
-sd => --section-data
llvm-svn: 359651
Align to the large page size (known as a superpage or huge page).
FreeBSD automatically promotes large, superpage-aligned allocations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27042
llvm-svn: 287782
This remove a fixme, cleans up the weak undef interaction with archives and
lets us keep weak undefs still weak if they resolve to shared.
llvm-svn: 267555
Fangrui Song