r282968 introduced a regression due to the lack of proper testing.
Re-add lax conversion support between non ext vectors for compound
assignments and add a test for that.
rdar://problem/28639467
llvm-svn: 309722
CodeGenFunction::EmitTypeMetadataCodeForVCall() could output an
llvm.assume(llvm.type.test())when CFI was enabled, optimizing out the
vcall check. This case was only reached when: 1) CFI-vcall was enabled,
2) -fwhole-program-tables was specified, and 3)
-fno-sanitize-trap=cfi-vcall was specified.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36013
llvm-svn: 309622
A change to InstCombine broke this test, but we generally frown on running optimizations clang tests anyway. So I've updated the checks to not depend on optimizations anymore.
llvm-svn: 309616
Summary:
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR33947.
https://godbolt.org/g/54XRMT
void f(int a) {
struct A {
void g(int a) {}
A() { int a; }
};
}
3 : <source>:3:16: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
void g(int a) {}
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
4 : <source>:4:15: warning: declaration shadows a local variable [-Wshadow]
A() { int a; }
^
1 : <source>:1:12: note: previous declaration is here
void f(int a) {
^
2 warnings generated.
The local variable `a` of the function `f` can't be accessed from a method of
the function-local class A, thus no shadowing occurs and no diagnostic is
needed.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, arphaman, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: rnk, Quuxplusone
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35941
llvm-svn: 309569
Summary:
Previously Clang incorrectly ignored the expression of a void `co_return`. This patch addresses that bug.
I'm not quite sure if I got the code-gen right, but this patch is at least a start.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith, GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36070
llvm-svn: 309545
Summary:
Previously Clang was not considering operator declarations that occur at function scope. This is incorrect according to [over.match.oper]p3
> The set of non-member candidates is the result of the unqualified lookup of operator@ in the context of the expression according to the usual rules for name lookup in unqualified function calls.
This patch changes operator name lookup to consider block scope declarations.
This patch fixes PR27027.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35297
llvm-svn: 309530
MS ignores the keyword "short" when used after a jc/jz instruction, LLVM ought to do the same.
llvm: D35892
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35893
llvm-svn: 309510
Allows the incorporation of legit (x86) Control Regs within inline asm stataements
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35903
llvm-svn: 309508
This led to crashes as the line number cache would report a bogus line number
for a line of code, and we'd try to find a nonexistent column within the line
when printing diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 309503
Clang specifies a max type alignment of 16 bytes on darwin targets (annoyingly in the driver not via cc1), meaning that the builtin nontemporal stores don't correctly align the loads/stores to 32 or 64 bytes when required, resulting in lowering to temporal unaligned loads/stores.
This patch casts the vectors to explicitly aligned types prior to the load/store to ensure that the require alignment is respected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35996
llvm-svn: 309488
On some targets, passing zero to the clz() or ctz() builtins has undefined
behavior. I ran into this issue while debugging UB in __hash_table from libcxx:
the bug I was seeing manifested itself differently under -O0 vs -Os, due to a
UB call to clz() (see: libcxx/r304617).
This patch introduces a check which can detect UB calls to builtins.
llvm.org/PR26979
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34590
llvm-svn: 309459
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
Clang specifies a max type alignment of 16 bytes on darwin targets, meaning that the builtin nontemporal stores don't correctly align the loads/stores to 32 or 64 bytes when required, resulting in lowering to temporal unaligned loads/stores.
llvm-svn: 309382
This tests the ARM64 specific constants added in SVN r309081,
similar to the one added in r277928 for armintr.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35934
llvm-svn: 309314
r303175 made changes to have __cxa_allocate_exception return a 16-byte
aligned pointer, so it's no longer necessary to specify a lower
alignment (8-bytes) for exception objects on Darwin.
rdar://problem/32363695
llvm-svn: 309308
When an omp for loop is canceled the constructed objects are being destructed
twice.
It looks like the desired code is:
{
Obj o;
If (cancelled) branch-through-cleanups to cancel.exit.
}
[cleanups]
cancel.exit:
__kmpc_for_static_fini
br cancel.cont (*)
cancel.cont:
__kmpc_barrier
return
The problem seems to be the branch to cancel.cont is currently also going
through the cleanups calling them again. This change just does a direct branch
instead.
Patch By: michael.p.rice@intel.com
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35854
llvm-svn: 309288
The ARM Runtime ABI document (IHI0043) defines the AEABI floating point
helper functions in 4.1.2 The floating-point helper functions. These
functions always use the base PCS (soft-fp). However helper functions
defined outside of this document such as the complex-number multiply and
divide helpers are not covered by this requirement and should use
hard-float PCS if the target is hard-float as both compiler-rt and libgcc
for a hard-float sysroot implement these functions with a hard-float PCS.
All of the floating point helper functions that are explicitly soft float
are expanded in the llvm ARM backend. This change makes clang not force the
BuiltinCC to AAPCS for AAPCS_VFP. With this change the ARM compiler-rt
tests involving _Complex pass with both hard-fp and soft-fp targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35538
llvm-svn: 309257
This just adds the CPU to a list of commands passed to GAS when not using the
integrated assembler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33820
llvm-svn: 309256
The initializer for a static local variable cannot be hot, because it runs at
most once per program. That's not quite the same thing as having a low branch
probability, but under the assumption that the function is invoked many times,
modeling this as a branch probability seems reasonable.
For TLS variables, the situation is less clear, since the initialization side
of the branch can run multiple times in a program execution, but we still
expect initialization to be rare relative to non-initialization uses. It would
seem worthwhile to add a PGO counter along this path to make this estimation
more accurate in future.
For globals with guarded initialization, we don't yet apply any branch weights.
Due to our use of COMDATs, the guard will be reached exactly once per DSO, but
we have no idea how many DSOs will define the variable.
llvm-svn: 309195
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
Summary:
`clang --autocomplete=-std` will show
```
-std: Language standard to compile for
-std= Language standard to compile for
-stdlib= C++ standard library to use
```
after this change.
However, showing HelpText with completion in bash seems super tricky, so
this feature will be used in other shells (fish, zsh...).
Reviewers: v.g.vassilev, teemperor, ruiu
Subscribers: cfe-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35759
llvm-svn: 309113
Josh Gao