Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
llvm-svn: 252219
inalloca variables were not treated as static allocas, therefore didn't
participate in regular stack instrumentation. We don't want them to
participate in dynamic alloca instrumentation as well.
llvm-svn: 252213
We already had a test for this for 32-bit SEH catchpads, but those don't
actually create funclets. We had a bug that only appeared in funclet
prologues, where we would establish EBP and ESI as our FP and BP, and
then downstream prologue code would overwrite them.
While I was at it, I fixed Win64+funclets+stackrealign. This issue
doesn't come up as often there due to the ABI requring 16 byte stack
alignment, but now we can rest easy that AVX and WinEH will work well
together =P.
llvm-svn: 252210
The needed lld matching changes to be submitted immediately next,
but this revision will cause lld failures with this alone which is expected.
This removes the eating of the error in Archive::Child::getSize() when the characters
in the size field in the archive header for the member is not a number. To do this we
have all of the needed methods return ErrorOr to push them up until we get out of lib.
Then the tools and can handle the error in whatever way is appropriate for that tool.
So the solution is to plumb all the ErrorOr stuff through everything that touches archives.
This include its iterators as one can create an Archive object but the first or any other
Child object may fail to be created due to a bad size field in its header.
Thanks to Lang Hames on the changes making child_iterator contain an
ErrorOr<Child> instead of a Child and the needed changes to ErrorOr.h to add
operator overloading for * and -> .
We don’t want to use llvm_unreachable() as it calls abort() and is produces a “crash”
and using report_fatal_error() to move the error checking will cause the program to
stop, neither of which are really correct in library code. There are still some uses of
these that should be cleaned up in this library code for other than the size field.
The test cases use archives with text files so one can see the non-digit character,
in this case a ‘%’, in the size field.
These changes will require corresponding changes to the lld project. That will be
committed immediately after this change. But this revision will cause lld failures
with this alone which is expected.
llvm-svn: 252192
Summary:
This review is related to another review request http://reviews.llvm.org/D11268, does the same and merely fixes a couple of issues with it.
D11268 is quite old and has merge conflicts against the current trunk.
This request
- rebases D11268 onto the new trunk;
- resolves the merge conflicts;
- fixes the prologue_end tests, which do not pass due to the subprogram definitions not marked as distinct.
Reviewers: echristo, rengolin, kubabrecka
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits, asl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14338
llvm-svn: 252177
This fixes the issue of wrong CFA calculation in the following case:
0x08048400 <+0>: push %ebx
0x08048401 <+1>: sub $0x8,%esp
0x08048404 <+4>: **call 0x8048409 <test+9>**
0x08048409 <+9>: **pop %eax**
0x0804840a <+10>: add $0x1bf7,%eax
0x08048410 <+16>: mov %eax,%ebx
0x08048412 <+18>: call 0x80483f0 <bar>
0x08048417 <+23>: add $0x8,%esp
0x0804841a <+26>: pop %ebx
0x0804841b <+27>: ret
The highlighted instructions are a product of movpc instruction. The call
instruction changes the stack pointer, and pop instruction restores its
value. However, the rule for computing CFA is not updated and is wrong on
the pop instruction. So, e.g. backtrace in gdb does not work when on the pop
instruction. This adds cfi instructions for both call and pop instructions.
cfi_adjust_cfa_offset** instruction is used with the appropriate offset for
setting the rules to calculate CFA correctly.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14021
llvm-svn: 252176
Summary:
GetUnderlyingObjects() can return "null" among its list of objects,
we don't want to deduce that two pointers can point to the same
memory in this case, so filter it out.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 252149
The operand layout is slightly different for the atomic
opcodes from the usual MUBUF loads and stores.
This should only fix it on SI/CI. VI is still broken
because it still emits the addr64 replacement.
llvm-svn: 252140
Summary:
The CLR's personality routine passes the pointer to the establisher frame
in RCX, not RDX.
Reviewers: pgavlin, majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14343
llvm-svn: 252135
Summary:
Earlier CaptureTracking would assume all "interesting" operands to a
call or invoke were its arguments. With operand bundles this is no
longer true.
Note: an earlier change got `doesNotCapture` working correctly with
operand bundles.
This change uses DSE to test the changes to CaptureTracking. DSE is a
vehicle for testing only, and is not directly involved in this change.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14306
llvm-svn: 252095
The generic infrastructure already did a lot of work to decide if the
fixup value is know or not. It doesn't make sense to reimplement a very
basic case: same fragment.
llvm-svn: 252090
Win64 has some strict requirements for the epilogue. As a result, we disable
shrink-wrapping for Win64 unless the block that gets the epilogue is already an
exit block.
Fixes PR24193.
llvm-svn: 252088
This patch improves the memory folding of the inserted float element for the (V)INSERTPS instruction.
The existing implementation occurs in the DAGCombiner and relies on the narrowing of a whole vector load into a scalar load (and then converted into a vector) to (hopefully) allow folding to occur later on. Not only has this proven problematic for debug builds, it also prevents other memory folds (notably stack reloads) from happening.
This patch removes the old implementation and moves the folding code to the X86 foldMemoryOperand handler. A new private 'special case' function - foldMemoryOperandCustom - has been added to deal with memory folding of instructions that can't just use the lookup tables - (V)INSERTPS is the first of several that could be done.
It also tweaks the memory operand folding code with an additional pointer offset that allows existing memory addresses to be modified, in this case to convert the vector address to the explicit address of the scalar element that will be inserted.
Unlike the previous implementation we now set the insertion source index to zero, although this is ignored for the (V)INSERTPSrm version, anything that relied on shuffle decodes (such as unfolding of insertps loads) was incorrectly calculating the source address - I've added a test for this at insertps-unfold-load-bug.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13988
llvm-svn: 252074
Patch by Slava Klochkov
The key difference between FMA* and FMA*_Int opcodes is that FMA*_Int opcodes are handled more conservatively. It is illegal to commute the 1st operand of FMA*_Int instructions as the upper bits of scalar FMA intrinsic result must be taken from the 1st operand, but such commute transformation would change those upper bits and invalidate the intrinsic's result.
Reviewers: Quentin Colombet, Elena Demikhovsky
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13710
llvm-svn: 252060
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252057
When converting an alias to a non-alias when the aliasee is not
imported, ensure that the linkage type is set to external so that it is
a valid linkage type. Added a test case that exposed this issue.
llvm-svn: 252054
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
llvm-svn: 252051
The x86 "sitofp i64 to double" dag combine, in 32-bit mode, lowers sitofp
directly to X86ISD::FILD (or FILD_FLAG). This should not be done in soft-float mode.
llvm-svn: 252042
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
llvm-svn: 252032
There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the
call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether
or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will
allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different
basic blocks. See test case for example.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158
llvm-svn: 252028
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
llvm-svn: 252017
If the requested SGPR was not actually aligned, it was
accepted and rounded down instead of rejected.
Also fix an assert if the range is an invalid size.
llvm-svn: 252009
Summary:
Add support for wasm's select operator, and lower LLVM's select DAG node
to it.
Reviewers: sunfish
Subscribers: dschuff, llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14295
llvm-svn: 252002
Summary:
We now collect all types of dependences including lexically forward
deps not just "interesting" ones.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13256
llvm-svn: 251985
XOP has the VPCMOV instruction that performs the common vector bit select operation OR( AND( SRC1, SRC3 ), AND( SRC2, ~SRC3 ) )
This patch adds tablegen pattern matching for this instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8841
llvm-svn: 251975
Summary:
When the dependence distance in zero then we have a loop-independent
dependence from the earlier to the later access.
No current client of LAA uses forward dependences so other than
potentially hitting the MaxDependences threshold earlier, this change
shouldn't affect anything right now.
This and the previous patch were tested together for compile-time
regression. None found in LNT/SPEC.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13255
llvm-svn: 251973
Summary:
Before this change, we didn't use to collect forward dependences since
none of the current clients (LV, LDist) required them.
The motivation to also collect forward dependences is a new pass
LoopLoadElimination (LLE) which discovers store-to-load forwarding
opportunities across the loop's backedge. The pass uses both lexically
forward or backward loop-carried dependences to detect these
opportunities.
The new pass also analyzes loop-independent (forward) dependences since
they can conflict with the loop-carried dependences in terms of how the
data flows through memory.
The newly added test only covers loop-carried forward dependences
because loop-independent ones are currently categorized as NoDep. The
next patch will fix this.
The two patches were tested together for compile-time regression. None
found in LNT/SPEC.
Note that with this change LAA provides all dependences rather than just
"interesting" ones. A subsequent NFC patch will remove the now trivial
isInterestingDependence and rename the APIs.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: jmolloy, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13254
llvm-svn: 251972
Peter Collingbourne