that provides the behavior of the C++11 library trait
std::is_trivially_constructible<T, Args...>, which can't be
implemented purely as a library.
Since __is_trivially_constructible can have zero or more arguments, I
needed to add Yet Another Type Trait Expression Class, this one
handling arbitrary arguments. The next step will be to migrate
UnaryTypeTrait and BinaryTypeTrait over to this new, more general
TypeTrait class.
Fixes the Clang side of <rdar://problem/10895483> / PR12038.
llvm-svn: 151352
that 'this' can be used in the brace-or-equal-initializer of a
non-static data member, and C++11 [expr.prim.lambda]p9, which says
that lambda expressions not in block scope can have no captures, side
fully with C++11 [expr.prim.general]p4 by allowing 'this' to be
captured within these initializers. This seems to be the intent of
non-static data member initializers.
llvm-svn: 151101
name mangling in the Itanium C++ ABI for lambda expressions is so
dependent on context, we encode the number used to encode each lambda
as part of the lambda closure type, and maintain this value within
Sema.
Note that there are a several pieces still missing:
- We still get the linkage of lambda expressions wrong
- We aren't properly numbering or mangling lambda expressions that
occur in default function arguments or in data member initializers.
- We aren't (de-)serializing the lambda numbering tables
llvm-svn: 150982
loop and switch statements, by teaching Scope that a function scope never has
a continue/break parent for the purposes of control flow. Remove the hack in
block and lambda expressions which worked around this by pretending that such
expressions were continue/break scopes.
Remove Scope::ControlParent, since it's unused.
In passing, teach default statements to recover properly from a missing ';', and
add a fixit for same to both default and case labels (the latter already
recovered correctly).
llvm-svn: 150776
Holding the constructor directly makes no sense when list-initialized arrays come into play. The constructor is now held in a CXXConstructExpr, if construction is what is done. The new design can also distinguish properly between list-initialization and direct-initialization, as well as implicit default-initialization constructors and explicit value-initialization constructors. Finally, doing it this way removes redundance from the AST because CXXNewExpr doesn't try to handle both the allocation and the initialization responsibilities.
This breaks the static analysis of new expressions. I've filed PR12014 to track this.
llvm-svn: 150682
default is '=', and reword the warning about explicitly capturing
'this' in such lambdas to indicate that only explicit capture is
banned.
Introduce Fix-Its for this and other "save the programmer from
themself" rules regarding what can be explicitly captured and what
must be implicitly captured.
llvm-svn: 150256
Pass a typo correction callback object from ParseCastExpr to
Sema::ActOnIdExpression to be a bit more selective about what kinds of
corrections will be allowed for unknown identifiers.
llvm-svn: 148973
Old error:
plusequaldeclare1.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
int x += 6;
^
;
New error:
plusequaldeclare1.cc:3:9: error: invalid '+=' at end of declaration; did you
mean '='?
int x += 6;
^~
=
llvm-svn: 148433
and DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion. To prevent
significant regression for should-this-be-a-call fixits,
and to repair some such regression from the introduction of
bound member placeholders, make those placeholder checks
try to build calls appropriately. Harden the build-a-call
logic while we're at it.
llvm-svn: 141738
For instance:
template <class T> void E() {};
class F {};
void test() {
::E<::F>();
E<::F>();
}
Gives the following error messages:
error: found '<::' after a template name which forms the
digraph '<:' (aka '[') and a ':', did you mean '< ::'?
::E<::F>();
^~~
< ::
error: expected expression
E<::F>();
^
error: expected ']'
note: to match this '['
E<::F>();
This patch adds the digraph fix-it check right before the name lookup,
moves the shared checking code to a new function, and adds new
tests to catch future regressions.
llvm-svn: 140039
Douglas Gregor