Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
any scheduling heuristics nor does it build up any scheduling data structure
that other heuristics use. It essentially linearize by doing a DFA walk but
it does handle glues correctly.
IMPORTANT: it probably can't handle all the physical register dependencies so
it's not suitable for x86. It also doesn't deal with dbg_value nodes right now
so it's definitely is still WIP.
rdar://12474515
llvm-svn: 166122
This time, also fix the caller of AddGlue to properly handle
incomplete chains. AddGlue had failure modes, but shamefully hid them
from its caller. It's luck ran out.
Fixes rdar://11314175: BuildSchedUnits assert.
llvm-svn: 155749
DAGCombine strangeness may result in multiple loads from the same
offset. They both may try to glue themselves to another load. We could
insist that the redundant loads glue themselves to each other, but the
beter fix is to bail out from bad gluing at the time we detect it.
Fixes rdar://11314175: BuildSchedUnits assert.
llvm-svn: 155668
ScheduleDAG is responsible for the DAG: SUnits and SDeps. It provides target hooks for latency computation.
ScheduleDAGInstrs extends ScheduleDAG and defines the current scheduling region in terms of MachineInstr iterators. It has access to the target's scheduling itinerary data. ScheduleDAGInstrs provides the logic for building the ScheduleDAG for the sequence of MachineInstrs in the current region. Target's can implement highly custom schedulers by extending this class.
ScheduleDAGPostRATDList provides the driver and diagnostics for current postRA scheduling. It maintains a current Sequence of scheduled machine instructions and logic for splicing them into the block. During scheduling, it uses the ScheduleHazardRecognizer provided by the target.
Specific changes:
- Removed driver code from ScheduleDAG. clearDAG is the only interface needed.
- Added enterRegion/exitRegion hooks to ScheduleDAGInstrs to delimit the scope of each scheduling region and associated DAG. They should be used to setup and cleanup any region-specific state in addition to the DAG itself. This is necessary because we reuse the same ScheduleDAG object for the entire function. The target may extend these hooks to do things at regions boundaries, like bundle terminators. The hooks are called even if we decide not to schedule the region. So all instructions in a block are "covered" by these calls.
- Added ScheduleDAGInstrs::begin()/end() public API.
- Moved Sequence into the driver layer, which is specific to the scheduling algorithm.
llvm-svn: 152208
sink them into MC layer.
- Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang
TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo.
llvm-svn: 134021
Removed the check that peeks past EXTRA_SUBREG, which I don't think
makes sense any more. Intead treat it as a normal register def. No
significant affect on x86 or ARM benchmarks.
llvm-svn: 133917
more callee-saved registers and introduce copies. Only allows it if scheduling
a node above calls would end up lessen register pressure.
Call operands also has added ABI restrictions for register allocation, so be
extra careful with hoisting them above calls.
rdar://9329627
llvm-svn: 130245
This is done by pushing physical register definitions close to their
use, which happens to handle flag definitions if they're not glued to
the branch. This seems to be generally a good thing though, so I
didn't need to add a target hook yet.
The primary motivation is to generate code closer to what people
expect and rule out missed opportunity from enabling macro-op
fusion. As a side benefit, we get several 2-5% gains on x86
benchmarks. There is one regression:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists slows down be -10%. But this is
an independent scheduler bug that will be tracked separately.
See rdar://problem/9283108.
Incidentally, pre-RA scheduling is only half the solution. Fixing the
later passes is tracked by:
<rdar://problem/8932804> [pre-RA-sched] on x86, attempt to schedule CMP/TEST adjacent with condition jump
Fixes:
<rdar://problem/9262453> Scheduler unnecessary break of cmp/jump fusion
llvm-svn: 129508
Additional fixes:
Do something reasonable for subtargets with generic
itineraries by handle node latency the same as for an empty
itinerary. Now nodes default to unit latency unless an itinerary
explicitly specifies a zero cycle stage or it is a TokenFactor chain.
Original fixes:
UnitsSharePred was a source of randomness in the scheduler: node
priority depended on the queue data structure. I rewrote the recent
VRegCycle heuristics to completely replace the old heuristic without
any randomness. To make the ndoe latency adjustments work, I also
needed to do something a little more reasonable with TokenFactor. I
gave it zero latency to its consumers and always schedule it as low as
possible.
llvm-svn: 129421
UnitsSharePred was a source of randomness in the scheduler: node
priority depended on the queue data structure. I rewrote the recent
VRegCycle heuristics to completely replace the old heuristic without
any randomness. To make these heuristic adjustments to node latency work,
I also needed to do something a little more reasonable with TokenFactor. I
gave it zero latency to its consumers and always schedule it as low as
possible.
llvm-svn: 129383
induction variable. The preRA scheduler is unaware of induction vars,
so we look for potential "virtual register cycles" instead.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8946719> Bad scheduling prevents coalescing
llvm-svn: 129100
with this before since none of the register tracking or nightly tests
had unschedulable nodes.
This should probably be refixed with a special default Node that just
returns some "don't touch me" values.
Fixes PR9427
llvm-svn: 127263
regs. This is the only change in this checkin that may affects the
default scheduler. With better register tracking and heuristics, it
doesn't make sense to artificially lower the register limit so much.
Added -sched-high-latency-cycles and X86InstrInfo::isHighLatencyDef to
give the scheduler a way to account for div and sqrt on targets that
don't have an itinerary. It is currently defaults to 10 (the actual
number doesn't matter much), but only takes effect on non-default
schedulers: list-hybrid and list-ilp.
Added several heuristics that can be individually disabled for the
non-default sched=list-ilp mode. This helps us determine how much
better we can do on a given benchmark than the default
scheduler. Certain compute intensive loops run much faster in this
mode with the right set of heuristics, and it doesn't seem to have
much negative impact elsewhere. Not all of the heuristics are needed,
but we still need to experiment to decide which should be disabled by
default for sched=list-ilp.
llvm-svn: 127067
precisely track pressure on a selection DAG, but we can at least keep
it balanced. This design accounts for various interesting aspects of
selection DAGS: register and subregister copies, glued nodes, dead
nodes, unused registers, etc.
Added SUnit::NumRegDefsLeft and ScheduleDAGSDNodes::RegDefIter.
Note: I disabled PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses when register
pressure is enabled, based on no evidence other than I don't think it
makes sense to have both enabled.
llvm-svn: 124853
1. Fix pre-ra scheduler so it doesn't try to push instructions above calls to
"optimize for latency". Call instructions don't have the right latency and
this is more likely to use introduce spills.
2. Fix if-converter cost function. For ARM, it should use instruction latencies,
not # of micro-ops since multi-latency instructions is completely executed
even when the predicate is false. Also, some instruction will be "slower"
when they are predicated due to the register def becoming implicit input.
rdar://8598427
llvm-svn: 118135
Benjamin Kramer