WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
the ABI spec, this turns out to simplify the code. We still have some annoying
code which mismatches the spec with regard to empty structures.
llvm-svn: 94796
1. Add helper class for sema checks for target attributes
2. Add helper class for codegen of target attributes
As a proof-of-concept - implement msp430's 'interrupt' attribute.
llvm-svn: 93118
Sanjiv Gupta