The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Bitfield RefersToEnclosingLocal of Stmt::DeclRefExprBitfields renamed to RefersToCapturedVariable to reflect latest changes introduced in commit 224323. Also renamed method Expr::refersToEnclosingLocal() to Expr::refersToCapturedVariable() and comments for constant arguments.
No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 224329
Currently, if global variable is marked as a private OpenMP variable, the compiler crashes in debug version or generates incorrect code in release version. It happens because in the OpenMP region the original global variable is used instead of the generated private copy. It happens because currently globals variables are not captured in the OpenMP region.
This patch adds capturing of global variables iff private copy of the global variable must be used in the OpenMP region.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6259
llvm-svn: 224323
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215323
This reverts commit r213307.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213325
(after fixing a bug in MultiplexConsumer I noticed the ownership of the
nested consumers was implemented with raw pointers - so this fixes
that... and follows the source back to its origin pushing unique_ptr
ownership up through there too)
llvm-svn: 213307
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
Benjamin Kramer