This was originally introduced in r278321 to work around correctness
problems in the ExecutionDepsFix pass; Probably also to keep the
performance benefits of breaking the false dependencies which of course
also affect undef operands.
ExecutionDepsFix has been improved here recently (see for example
r278321) so we should not need this exception any longer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29525
llvm-svn: 294087
This patch helps avoid false dependencies on undef registers by updating the machine instructions' undef operand to use a register that the instruction is truly dependent on, or use a register with clearance higher than Pref.
Pseudo example:
loop:
xmm0 = ...
xmm1 = vcvtsi2sdl eax, xmm0<undef>
... = inst xmm0
jmp loop
In this example, selecting xmm0 as the undef register creates false dependency between loop iterations.
This false dependency cannot be solved by inserting an xor before vcvtsi2sdl because xmm0 is alive at the point of the vcvtsi2sdl instruction.
Selecting a different register instead of xmm0, especially a register that is not used in the loop, will eliminate this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22466
llvm-svn: 278321
remove copies that are useful after breaking some hardware dependencies.
In other words, handle this kind of situations conservatively by assuming reg2
is redefined by the undef flag.
reg1 = copy reg2
= inst reg2<undef>
reg2 = copy reg1
Copy propagation used to remove the last copy.
This is incorrect because the undef flag on reg2 in inst, allows next
passes to put whatever trashed value in reg2 that may help.
In practice we end up with this code:
reg1 = copy reg2
reg2 = 0
= inst reg2<undef>
reg2 = copy reg1
This fixes PR21743.
llvm-svn: 235647
Matthias Braun