to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Prior to r351069, lambda classes were traversed or not depending on the
{Function, Class, Namespace, TU} DeclContext containing them.
If it was a function (common case) they were not traversed.
If it was a namespace or TU (top-level lambda) they were traversed as part of
that DeclContext traversal.
r351069 "fixed" RAV to traverse these as part of the LambdaExpr, which is the
right place. But top-level lambdas are now traversed twice.
We fix that as blocks and block captures were apparently fixed in the past.
Maybe it would be nicer to avoid adding the lambda classes to the DeclContext
in the first place, but I can't work out the implications of that.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56665
llvm-svn: 351075
Summary:
This fixes ASTContext's parent map for nodes in such classes (e.g. operator()).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39949
This also changes the observed shape of the AST for implicit RAVs.
- this includes AST MatchFinder: cxxRecordDecl() now matches lambda classes,
functionDecl() matches the call operator, and the parent chain is body -> call
operator -> lambda class -> lambdaexpr rather than body -> lambdaexpr.
- this appears not to matter for the ASTImporterLookupTable builder
- this doesn't matter for the other RAVs in-tree.
In order to do this, we remove the TraverseLambdaBody hook. The problem is it's
hard/weird to ensure this hook is called when traversing via the implicit class.
There were just two users of this hook in-tree, who use it to skip bodies.
I replaced these with explicitly traversing the captures only. Another approach
would be recording the bodies when the lambda is visited, and then recognizing
them later.
I'd be open to suggestion on how to preserve this hook, instead.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith, jdennett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
llvm-svn: 351047
RecursiveASTVisitorTest.cpp is one of the longest compile jobs and a
build bottleneck on many-core machines. This patch breaks that file and
some peer files up into smaller files to increase build concurrency and
overall rebuild performance.
llvm-svn: 330353
Chandler Carruth