Summary:
This merges VFPtrInfo and VBTableInfo into VPtrInfo, since they hold
almost the same information. With that change, the vbtable mangling
code can easily be applied to vftable data and we magically get the
correct, unambiguous vftable names.
Fixes PR17748.
Reviewers: timurrrr, majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2893
llvm-svn: 202425
Virtual methods expect 'this' to point to the vfptr containing the
virtual method, and this extends to virtual member pointer thunks. The
relevant vfptr is always at offset zero on entry to the thunk, and no
this adjustment is needed.
Previously we would not include the vfptr adjustment in the member
pointer, and we'd look at the vfptr offset when loading from the vftable
in the thunk.
Fixes PR18917.
llvm-svn: 201835
The MS ABI requires that we determine the vbptr offset if have a
virtual inheritance model. Instead, raise an error pointing to the
diagnostic when this happens.
This fixes PR18583.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2842
llvm-svn: 201824
Summary:
Generally the vector deleting dtor, which we model as a vtable thunk,
takes care of non-virtual adjustment and delegates to the other
destructor variants. The other non-complete destructor variants assume
that 'this' on entry points to the virtual base subobject that first
declared the virtual destructor.
We need to change the adjustment in both the prologue and the vdtor call
setup.
Reviewers: timurrrr
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2821
llvm-svn: 201612
Member pointers are mangled as they would be represented at runtime.
They can be a single integer literal, single decl, or a tuple with some
more numbers tossed in. With Clang today, most of those numbers will be
zero because we reject pointers to members of virtual bases.
This change required moving VTableContextBase ownership from
CodeGenVTables to ASTContext, because mangling now depends on vtable
layout.
I also hoisted the inheritance model helpers up to be inline static
methods of MSInheritanceAttr. This makes the AST code that deals with
member pointers much more readable.
MSVC doesn't appear to have stable manglings of null member pointers:
- Null data memptrs in function templates have a mangling collision with
the first field of a non-polymorphic single inheritance class.
- The mangling of null data memptrs changes if you add casts.
- Large null function memptrs in class templates crash MSVC.
Clang uses the class template mangling for null data memptrs and the
function template mangling for null function memptrs to deal with this.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2695
llvm-svn: 200857
When a non-trivial parameter is present, clang now gathers up all the
parameters that lack inreg and puts them into a packed struct. MSVC
always aligns each parameter to 4 bytes and no more, so this is a pretty
simple struct to lay out.
On win64, non-trivial records are passed indirectly. Prior to this
change, clang was incorrectly using byval on win64.
I'm able to self-host a working clang with this change and additional
LLVM patches.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2636
llvm-svn: 200597
This reverts commit r199475 (which reverted r199416) with fixes for the
breakages.
We wouldn't lock an inheritance model if we saw a pointer-to-member
formed as a result of the address-of operator.
llvm-svn: 199482
The MSVC ABI is rather finicky about the exact representation of it's
pointer-to-member representation. The exact position of when and where
it will go with one representation versus another appears to be when it
desires the pointer-to-member to be complete.
To properly implement this in clang, do several things:
- Give up on tracking the polymorphic nature of the class. It isn't
useful to Sema and is only pertinent when choosing CodeGen-time
details like whether the field-offset can be 0 instead of -1.
- Insist on locking-in the inheritance model when we ask our
pointer-to-member type to be complete. From there, grab the
underlying CXXRecordDecl and try to make *that* complete. Once we've
done this, we can calculate it's inheritance model and apply it using
an attribute.
N.B. My first bullet point is a lie. We will eventually care about the
specifics of whether or not a CXXRecordDecl is or is not polymorphic
because MSVC compatible mangling of such things depends on it. However,
I believe we will handle this in a rather different way.
llvm-svn: 199416
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Summary:
This makes us more compatible with MSVC 2012+ and fixes PR17748 where we
would give two tables the same name.
Rather than doing a fresh depth-first traversal of the inheritance graph
for every record's vbtables, now we memoize vbtable paths for each
record. By doing memoization, we end up considering virtual bases of
subobjects that come later in the depth-first traversal. Where
previously we would have ignored a virtual base that we'd already seen,
we now consider it for name mangling purposes without emitting a
duplicate vbtable for it.
Reviewers: majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2509
llvm-svn: 198462
Summary:
No functionality change.
This code should live here long-term because we should be able to use it
to compute correct vftable names.
It turns out that the most natural way to implement the naming algorithm
is to use a caching layer similar to what we already have for virtual
table info in VTableContext. Subsequent changes will take advantage of
this to fix PR17748, where we have a vbtable name collision.
Reviewers: majnemer
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2499
llvm-svn: 198380
Unlike Itanium's VTTs, the 'most derived' boolean or bitfield is the
last parameter for non-variadic constructors, rather than the second.
For variadic constructors, the 'most derived' parameter comes after the
'this' parameter. This affects constructor calls and constructor decls
in a variety of places.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2405
llvm-svn: 197518
Testing has revealed that large integral constants (i.e. > INT64_MAX)
are always mangled as-if they are negative, even in places where it
would not make sense for them to be negative (like non-type template
parameters of type unsigned long long).
To address this, we change the way we model number mangling: always
mangle as-if our number is an int64_t. This should result in correct
results when we have large unsigned numbers.
N.B. Bizarrely, things that are 32-bit displacements like vbptr offsets
are mangled as-if they are unsigned 32-bit numbers. This is a pretty
egregious waste of space, it would be a 4x savings if we could mangle it
like a signed 32-bit number. Instead, we explicitly cast these
displacements to uint32_t and let the mangler proceed.
llvm-svn: 196771
This makes Clang emit a linkonce_odr definition for 'val' in the code below,
to be compatible with MSVC-compiled code:
struct Foo {
static const int val = 1;
};
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2233
llvm-svn: 195283
Instead of storing the vtable offset directly in the function pointer and
doing a branch to check for virtualness at each call site, the MS ABI
generates a thunk for calling the function at a specific vtable offset,
and puts that in the function pointer.
This patch adds support for emitting such thunks. However, it doesn't support
pointers to virtual member functions that are variadic, have an incomplete
aggregate return type or parameter, or are overriding a function in a virtual
base class.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2104
llvm-svn: 194827
If a class is using the unspecified inheritance model for member
pointers and later we find the class is defined to use single
inheritance, zero out the vbptr offset field of the member pointer when
it is formed.
llvm-svn: 192664
Static locals requiring initialization are not thread safe on Windows.
Unfortunately, it's possible to create static locals that are actually
externally visible with inline functions and templates. As a result, we
have to implement an initialization guard scheme that is compatible with
TUs built by MSVC, which makes thread safety prohibitively difficult.
MSVC's scheme is that every function that requires a guard gets an i32
bitfield. Each static local is assigned a bit that indicates if it has
been initialized, up to 32 bits, at which point a new bitfield is
created. MSVC rejects inline functions with more than 32 static locals,
and the externally visible mangling (?_B) only allows for one guard
variable per function.
On Eli's recommendation, I used MangleNumberingContext to track which
bit each static corresponds to.
Implements PR16888.
Reviewers: rjmccall, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1416
llvm-svn: 190427
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
This allows clang to use the backend parameter attribute 'returned' when generating 'this'-returning constructors and destructors in ARM and MSVC C++ ABIs.
llvm-svn: 185291
Itanium destroys them in the caller at the end of the full expression,
but MSVC destroys them in the callee. This is further complicated by
the need to emit EH-only destructor cleanups in the caller.
This should help clang compile MSVC's debug iterators more correctly.
There is still an outstanding issue in PR5064 of a memcpy emitted by the
LLVM backend, which is not correct for C++ records.
Fixes PR16226.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D929
llvm-svn: 184543
Reid Kleckner