This is an alternative to the continous mode that was implemented in
D68351. This mode relies on padding and the ability to mmap a file over
the existing mapping which is generally only available on POSIX systems
and isn't suitable for other platforms.
This change instead introduces the ability to relocate counters at
runtime using a level of indirection. On every counter access, we add a
bias to the counter address. This bias is stored in a symbol that's
provided by the profile runtime and is initially set to zero, meaning no
relocation. The runtime can mmap the profile into memory at abitrary
location, and set bias to the offset between the original and the new
counter location, at which point every subsequent counter access will be
to the new location, which allows updating profile directly akin to the
continous mode.
The advantage of this implementation is that doesn't require any special
OS support. The disadvantage is the extra overhead due to additional
instructions required for each counter access (overhead both in terms of
binary size and performance) plus duplication of counters (i.e. one copy
in the binary itself and another copy that's mmapped).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69740
As of D70146 lld GCs comdats as a group and no longer considers notes in
comdats to be GC roots, so we need to move the note to a comdat with a GC root
section (.init_array) in order to prevent lld from discarding the note.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72936
During the SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP pass, signed extensions are distributed
to the values that feed into them and then later recombined. The recombination
stage is somewhat problematic- it doesn't differ add and sub instructions
from another when matching the sext(a) +/- sext(b) -> sext(a +/- b) pattern
in some instances.
An example- the IR contains:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extA + extB
The problematic optimization will transform that into:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extend subuAuB ; Obviously not semantically equivalent to the IR input.
This patch fixes that.
Patch by Drew Wock <drew.wock@sas.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65967
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44552. We need to make
sure that the store is reprocessed, because performing DSE may
expose more DSE opportunities.
There is a slight caveat here though: We need to make sure that we
add back the store the worklist first, because that means it will
be processed after the operands of the removed store have been
processed. This is a general bug in InstCombine worklist management
that I hope to address at some point, but for now it means we need
to do this manually rather than just returning the instruction as
changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72807
There are two related bugs here: First, we don't add the operand
we're replacing to the worklist, which means it may not get DCEd
(see test change). Second, usually this would just get picked up
in the next iteration, but we also do not report the instruction
as changed. This means that we do not get that extra instcombine
iteration, and more importantly, may break the pass pipeline, as
the function is not marked as changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72864
Currently, there is no way to disable ExpensiveCombines when doing
a standalone opt -instcombine run, as that's the default, and the
opt option can currently only be used to force enable, not to force
disable. The only way to disable expensive combines is via -O1 or -O2,
but that of course also runs the rest of the kitchen sink...
This patch allows using opt -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 to
run InstCombine without ExpensiveCombines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72861
This reverts commit 3f3017e because there's a failure on peel-loop-nests.ll
with LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
There are a few global (cl::opt) controls that enable optional
behavior in GVN. Introduce GVNOptions that provide corresponding
per-pass instance controls.
That will allow to use GVN multiple times in pipeline each time
with different settings.
Reviewers: asbirlea, rnk, reames, skatkov, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72732
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.
In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.
This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.
The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
Summary:
This commits is a rework of the patch in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
The rework was requested to prevent out-of-tree performance regression
when vectorizing out-of-tree IR intrinsics. The vectorization of such
intrinsics is enquired via the static function `isTLIScalarize`. For
detail see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
Reviewers: uabelho, fhahn, sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72734
The assume intrinsic is intentionally marked as may reading/writing
memory, to avoid passes moving them around. When flattening the CFG
for predicated blocks, we have to drop the assume calls, as they
are control-flow dependent.
There are some cases where we can do better (when control flow is
preserved), but that is follow-up work.
Fixes PR43620.
Reviewers: hsaito, rengolin, dcaballe, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68814
Summary:
This change implements the expansion in two parts:
- Add a utility function emitAMDGPUPrintfCall() in LLVM.
- Invoke the above function from Clang CodeGen, when processing a HIP
program for the AMDGPU target.
The printf expansion has undefined behaviour if the format string is
not a compile-time constant. As a sufficient condition, the HIP
ToolChain now emits -Werror=format-nonliteral.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71365
After extracting, fix up debug info in both the old and new functions by
1) Pointing line locations and debug intrinsics to the new subprogram
scope, and
2) Deleting intrinsics which point to values outside of the new
function.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D72795.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, a build of LNT in the `-Os -g` config
with "-mllvm -hot-cold-split=1" set, and end-to-end debugging of a toy
program which undergoes splitting to verify that lldb can find
variables, single step, etc. in extracted code.
rdar://45507940
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72801
It appears to be rather useful when analyzing Loops with multiple
deoptimizing exits, perhaps merged ones.
For now it is used in LoopPredication, will be adding more uses
in other loop passes.
Reviewers: asbirlea, fhahn, skatkov, spatel, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72754
Summary:
InlineResult is used both in APIs assessing whether a call site is
inlinable (e.g. llvm::isInlineViable) as well as in the function
inlining utility (llvm::InlineFunction). It means slightly different
things (can/should inlining happen, vs did it happen), and the
implicit casting may introduce ambiguity (casting from 'false' in
InlineFunction will default a message about hight costs,
which is incorrect here).
The change renames the type to a more generic name, and disables
implicit constructors.
Reviewers: eraman, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: kerbowa, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72744
Summary: Duplicate code in widenWithVariantLoadUseCodegen is removed and also use assert to check unknown extension type as it should be filtered out by the pre condition check before calling this function.
Reviewers: az, sanjoy, sebpop, efriedma, javed.absar, sanjoy.google
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, amehsan
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72652
Factor out the logic needed to update debug locations contained within
MD_loop metadata.
This refactor is preparation for a future change that also needs to
rewrite MD_loop metadata.
rdar://45507940
Summary:
Current peeling implementation bails out in case of loop nests.
The patch introduces a field in TargetTransformInfo structure that
certain targets can use to relax the constraints if it's
profitable (disabled by default).
Also additional option is added to enable peeling manually for
experimenting and testing purposes.
Reviewers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
As discussed in the motivating PR44509:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44509
...we can end up with worse code using fast-math than without.
This is because the reassociate pass greedily transforms fsub
into fneg/fadd and apparently (based on the regression tests
seen here) expects instcombine to clean that up if it wasn't
profitable. But we were missing this fold:
(X - Y) - Z --> X - (Y + Z)
There's another, more specific case that I think we should
handle as shown in the "fake" fneg test (but missed with a real
fneg), but that's another patch. That may be tricky to get
right without conflicting with existing transforms for fneg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72521
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
When multiple guard intrinsics are merged into one, currently the
result of eraseInstFromFunction() is returned -- however, this
should only be done if the current instruction is being removed.
In this case we're removing a different instruction and should
instead report that the current one has been modified by returning it.
For this test case, this reduces the number of instcombine iterations
from 5 to 2 (the minimum possible).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72558
This ports the MergeFunctions pass to the NewPM. This was rather
straightforward, as no analyses are used.
Additionally MergeFunctions needs to be conditionally enabled in
the PassBuilder, but I left that part out of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72537
This fixes the issue encountered in D71164. Instead of using a
range-based for, manually iterate over the users and advance the
iterator beforehand, so we do not skip any users due to iterator
invalidation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72657
Summary:
An assert added to the index-based WPD was trying to verify that we only
have multiple vtables for a given guid when they are all non-external
linkage. This is too conservative because we may have multiple external
vtable with the same guid when they are in comdat. Remove the assert,
as we don't have comdat information in the index, the linker should
issue an error in this case.
See discussion on D71040 for more information.
Reviewers: evgeny777, aganea
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72648
Summary:
If aligment on `LoadInst` isn't specified, load is assumed to be ABI-aligned.
And said aligment may be different for different types.
So if we change load type, but don't pay extra attention to the aligment
(i.e. keep it unspecified), we may either overpromise (if the default aligment
of the new type is higher), or underpromise (if the default aligment
of the new type is smaller).
Thus, if no alignment is specified, we need to manually preserve the implied ABI alignment.
This addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44543 by making combineLoadToNewType preserve ABI alignment of the load.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72710
This reverts commit a03d7b0f24.
As discussed in D68298, this causes a compile-time regression, in case
the DTs requested are not used elsewhere in GlobalOpt. We should only
get the DTs if they are available here, but this seems not possible with
the legacy pass manager from a module pass.
Summary: This fixes a crash in internal builds under SamplePGO.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72653
Summary:
A recent fix in D69452 fixed index based WPD in the presence of
available_externally vtables. It added a cast of the vtable def
summary to a GlobalVarSummary. However, in some cases one def may be an
alias, in which case we need to get the base object before casting,
otherwise we will crash.
Reviewers: evgeny777, steven_wu, aganea
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71040
Fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44419 by preserving the
nuw on sub of geps. We only do this if the offset has a multiplication
as the final operation, as we can't be sure the operations is nuw
in the other cases without more thorough analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72048
Summary:
Avoid using the `nocf_check` attribute with Control Flow Guard. Instead, use a
new `"guard_nocf"` function attribute to indicate that checks should not be
added on indirect calls within that function. Add support for
`__declspec(guard(nocf))` following the same syntax as MSVC.
Reviewers: rnk, dmajor, pcc, hans, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, tomrittervg, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72167
Memory instruction widening recipes use the pointer operand of their load/store
ingredient for generating the needed GEPs, making it difficult to feed these
recipes with pointers based on other ingredients or none at all.
This patch modifies these recipes to use a VPValue for the pointer instead, in
order to reduce ingredient def-use usage by ILV as a step towards full
VPlan-based def-use relations. The recipes are constructed with VPValues bound
to these ingredients, maintaining current behavior.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70865
pass.
Summary: This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass to a function pass, and
keeps the loops traversal order same as defined in
FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor LoopPassManager.h.
The next patch will change the loop traversal to outer to inner order,
so more loops can be transform.
Discussion in llvm-dev mailing list:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/LF4rUjkVI2g
Reviewer: dmgreen, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, kbarton, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72230
This is a special case of Z / (X / Y) => (Y * Z) / X, with X = 1.0.
The m_OneUse check is avoided because even in the case of the
multiple uses for 1.0/Y, the number of instructions remain the same
and a division is replaced by a multiplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72319
This patch updates the shape propagation to iterate until no new shape
information is discovered.
As initial seed for the forward propagation, we use the matrix intrinsic
instructions. Both propagateShapeForward and propagateShapeBackward
return new work lists, with the instructions to be used for the next
iteration. When propagating forward, we record all instructions we added
new shape information for. When propagating backward, we record all
users of instructions we added new shape information for.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70901
This patch extends to shape propagation to also include load
instructions and implements shape aware lowering for vector loads.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70900
This patch extends the shape propagation for matrix operations to also
propagate the shape of instructions to their operands.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70899
This addresses a vectorisation regression for tail-folded loops that are
counting down, e.g. loops as simple as this:
void foo(char *A, char *B, char *C, uint32_t N) {
while (N > 0) {
*C++ = *A++ + *B++;
N--;
}
}
These are loops that can be vectorised, but when tail-folding is requested, it
can't find a primary induction variable which we do need for predicating the
loop. As a result, the loop isn't vectorised at all, which it is able to do
when tail-folding is not attempted. So, this adds a check for the primary
induction variable where we decide how to lower the scalar epilogue. I.e., when
there isn't a primary induction variable, a scalar epilogue loop is allowed
(i.e. don't request tail-folding) so that vectorisation could still be
triggered.
Having this check for the primary induction variable make sense anyway, and in
addition, in a follow-up of this I will look into discovering earlier the
primary induction variable for counting down loops, so that this can also be
tail-folded.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72324
Petr Hosek