As a side-effect, constructors definitions will correctly be recognized
and formatted as function declarations. Tests will be added in a
follow-up patch actually using the correct recognition.
llvm-svn: 194209
Also - others have complained about some white space issues - sorry about that - continues to be a pain point for me - will try and see what I can do with clang-format this evening after work - as a short term fix, if anyone can email me the files that they have already identified with issues, it would help me speed up a focused fix. sorry.
llvm-svn: 194206
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
Summary:
Similar to __FUNCTION__, MSVC exposes the name of the enclosing mangled
function name via __FUNCDNAME__. This implementation is very naive and
unoptimized, it is expected that __FUNCDNAME__ would be used rarely in
practice.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith, thakis
CC: cfe-commits, silvas
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2109
llvm-svn: 194181
These allow clients to retrieve persistent AST objects (ASTUnits) which
can be used in an ad-hoc manner after parsing.
To accommodate this change, the code for processing a CompilerInvocation
using a FrontendAction has been factored out to FrontendActionFactory, and
a new base class, ToolAction, has been introduced, allowing the tool to do
arbitrary things with each CompilerInvocation. This change was necessary
because ASTUnit does not use the FrontendAction interface directly.
This change also causes the FileManager in ClangTool to use shared ownership.
This will become necessary because ASTUnit takes shared ownership of
FileManager (ClangTool's FileManager is currently unused by ASTUnit; this
is a FIXME). As shown in the tests, any client of ToolInvocation will
need to be modified to use shared ownership for FileManager.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2097
llvm-svn: 194164
On the microsoft ABI clang is producing one weak_odr and one linkonce_odr
destructor, which is reasonable since only one is required.
The fix is simply to move the assert past the special case treatment of
linkonce_odr.
llvm-svn: 194158
These functions can generally be applied to multiple kinds of AST node,
so it makes sense to add them to DynTypedNode.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2096
llvm-svn: 194113
NS_RETURNS_INNER_POINTER under -objcmt-returns-innerpointer-property
flag (off by default), as older compilers do not support such annotations.
// rdar://15396636
llvm-svn: 194100
bit more robust against future changes. This includes a slight diagnostic
improvement: if we know we're only trying to form a constant expression, take
the first diagnostic which shows the expression is not a constant expression,
rather than preferring the first one which makes the expression unfoldable.
llvm-svn: 194098
hack of passing -fconst-strings to -cc1, but at least the driver uses
the regular warning checking code path.
Since we don't support a warning that is DefaultIgnore in one language
but not in another, this patch creates a dummy C only warning in the same
group as the existing one to get the desired effect.
llvm-svn: 194097
This is a small optimization on linux, but should help more on windows
where msvc only outputs one destructor if there would be two identical ones.
llvm-svn: 194095
Before, clang-format would always format entire nested blocks, which
can be unwanted e.g. for long DEBUG({...}) statements. Also
clang-format would not allow to merge lines in nested blocks (e.g. to
put "if (a) return;" on one line in Google style).
This is the first step of several refactorings mostly focussing on the
additional functionality (by reusing the "format many lines" code to
format the children of a nested block). The next steps are:
* Pull out the line merging into its own class.
* Seperate the formatting of many lines from the formatting of a single
line (and the analysis of the solution space).
llvm-svn: 194090
After lexing a '##', we would look ahead and check to see if it was
followed by '__VA_ARGS__'. After doing so, we would then go ahead and
lex the token.
However we would fail in the case where the '##' was followed by a '#'
followed by an identifier because we would have lexed the '#' separately
from the identifier, bypassing our parameter validation logic.
Instead, lex the tokens coming after the '##' later.
This fixes PR17804.
llvm-svn: 194059
deallocation function (and the corresponding unsized deallocation function has
been declared), emit a weak discardable definition of the function that
forwards to the corresponding unsized deallocation.
This allows a C++ standard library implementation to provide both a sized and
an unsized deallocation function, where the unsized one does not just call the
sized one, for instance by putting both in the same object file within an
archive.
llvm-svn: 194055
This is a small optimization on linux, but should help more on windows
where msvc only outputs one destructor if there would be two identical ones.
llvm-svn: 194046
This change fixes Richard's testcase for r193815. Now we include non-explicit
submodules into the list of exports.
The test failed previously because:
- recursive_visibility_a1.inner is not imported (only recursive_visibility_a1 is),
- thus the 'inner' submodule is not showing up in any of the import lists,
- and because of this getExportedModules() is not returning the
correct module set -- it only considers modules that are imported.
The fix is to make Module::getExportedModules() include non-explicit submodules
into the list of exports.
llvm-svn: 194018
Similar C code isn't caught as it seems to hit a different code path.
Also, as the check is only done for record pointers, cases involving
an overloaded operator-> are not handled either. Note that the reason
this check is done in the parser instead of Sema is not related to
having enough knowledge about the current state as it is about being
able to fix up the parser's state to be able to recover and traverse the
correct code paths.
llvm-svn: 194002
Richard Smith