Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
Summary:
By removing FeatureNoARM implies ModeThumb, we can detect cases where a
function's target-features contain -thumb-mode (enables ARM codegen for the
function), but the architecture does not support ARM mode. Previously, the
implication caused the FeatureNoARM bit to be cleared for functions with
-thumb-mode, making the assertion in ARMSubtarget::ARMSubtarget [1]
pointless for such functions.
This assertion is the only guard against generating ARM code for
architectures without ARM codegen support. Is there a place where we
could easily generate error messages for the user? At the moment, we
would generate ARM code for Thumb-only architectures. X86 has the same
behavior as ARM, as in it only has an assertion and no error message,
but I think for ARM an error message would be helpful. What do you
think?
For the example below, `llc -mtriple=armv7m-eabi test.ll -o -` will
generate ARM assembler (or fail with an assertion error with this patch).
Note that if we run the resulting assembler through llvm-mc, we get
an appropriate error message, but not when codegen is handled
through clang.
```
define void @bar() #0 {
entry:
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "target-features"="-thumb-mode" }
```
[1] c1f7b54cef/lib/Target/ARM/ARMSubtarget.cpp (L147)
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin, peter.smith, aadg, silviu.baranga, richard.barton.arm, echristo
Reviewed By: rengolin, echristo
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35569
llvm-svn: 310476
When scavenging for a use in instruction MI, we will reload after
that instruction and hence cannot spill uses/defs of this instruction.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR33687
llvm-svn: 307352
Puyan Lotfi