form of call in preference to memory indirect on Atom.
In this case, the patch applies the optimization to the code for reloading
spilled registers.
The patch also includes changes to sibcall.ll and movgs.ll, which were
failing on the Atom buildbot after the first patch was applied.
This patch by Sriram Murali.
llvm-svn: 178193
Made sure we were looking a correct section
Added Mips32/64 as an extra check
Updated llvm-objdump to generate symbolic info for Mips relocations
llvm-svn: 178190
These functions should have the same list of load/store instructions. Now that
all load/store forms have been normalized (to single instructions or pseudos)
they can be resynchronized.
Found by inspection, although hopefully this will improve optimization. I've
also added some comments.
llvm-svn: 178180
indirect through a memory address is to load the memory address into
a register and then call indirect through the register.
This patch implements this improvement by modifying SelectionDAG to
force a function address which is a memory reference to be loaded
into a virtual register.
Patch by Sriram Murali.
llvm-svn: 178171
This may be causing a failure on some buildbots:
Referencing function in another module!
tail call fastcc void @_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj(i16 zeroext %17, i16* %Vals, i32* %NumVals), !dbg !219
Referencing function in another module!
tail call fastcc void @_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj(i16 zeroext %19, i16* %Vals, i32* %NumVals), !dbg !221
Broken module found, compilation aborted!
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module 'ld-temp.o'.
1. Running pass 'Module Verifier' on function '@_ZL11EvaluateOpstPtRj'
clang: error: unable to execute command: Illegal instruction: 4
clang: error: linker command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation)
<rdar://problem/13516485>
llvm-svn: 178156
As far as simplify_type is concerned, there are 3 kinds of smart pointers:
* const correct: A 'const MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'const int*'. A
'MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'int *'.
* always const: Even a 'MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'const int*'.
* no const: Even a 'const MyPtr<int> &' produces a 'int*'.
This patch then does the following:
* Removes the unused specializations. Since they are unused, it is hard
to know which kind should be implemented.
* Make sure we don't drop const.
* Fix the default forwarding so that const correct pointer only need
one specialization.
* Simplifies the existing specializations.
llvm-svn: 178147
This is a follow-up to r178073 (which should actually make target-customized
spilling work again).
I still don't have a regression test for this (but it would be good to have
one; Thumb 1 and Mips16 use this callback as well).
Patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 178137
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178127
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178126
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178125
The register parameter in these instructions becomes the base register in an
r+i ld instruction (and, thus, cannot be r0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even then any
test would be very fragile).
llvm-svn: 178121
Either operand of these pseudo instructions can be transformed into the first
operand of an isel instruction (and this operand cannot be r0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even when we do,
any test would be very fragile).
llvm-svn: 178119
Like the addi/addis instructions themselves, these pseudo instructions also
cannot have r0 as their register parameter (because it will be interpreted as
the value 0).
This is not yet testable because we don't yet allocate r0 (and even when we do,
any regression test would be very fragile because it would depend on the
register allocator heuristics).
llvm-svn: 178118
Some implementation detail in the forgotten past required the link
register to be placed in the GPRC and G8RC register classes. This is
just wrong on the face of it, and causes several extra intersection
register classes to be generated. I found this was having evil
effects on instruction scheduling, by causing the wrong register class
to be consulted for register pressure decisions.
No code generation changes are expected, other than some minor changes
in instruction order. Seven tests in the test bucket required minor
tweaks to adjust to the new normal.
llvm-svn: 178114
The test was removed since I had not turned off the test during release
builds. This fails since ARC annotations support is conditionally
compiled out during release builds. I added the proper requires header
to assuage this issue.
llvm-svn: 178101
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
As Bill Schmidt pointed out to me, only on Darwin do we need to spill/restore
VRSAVE in the SjLj code. For non-Darwin, don't spill/restore VRSAVE (and I've
added some asserts to make sure that we're not).
As it turns out, we're not currently handling the Darwin case correctly (I've
added a FIXME in the test case). I've tried adding various implied register
definitions/uses to force the spill without success, so I'll need to address
this later.
llvm-svn: 178096
if execution failed. ExecuteAndWait returns -1 upon an execution failure, but
checking the return value isn't sufficient because the wait command may
return -1 as well. This new parameter is to be used by the clang driver in a
subsequent commit.
Part of rdar://13362359
llvm-svn: 178087
If we compile a single source program, the `.gcda' file will be generated where
the program was executed. This isn't desirable, because that place may be at an
unpredictable place (the program could call `chdir' for instance).
Instead, we will output the `.gcda' file in the same place we output the `.gcno'
file. I.e., the directory where the executable was generated. This matches GCC's
behavior.
<rdar://problem/13061072> & PR11809
llvm-svn: 178084
All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity
of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for
processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably
need its own.
The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely
different. So are the non-Intel chips.
llvm-svn: 178080
This will be used to factor out some uses of magic number operand offsets
inside Clang where these fields were updated in an effort to resolve forward
declarations/circular references.
llvm-svn: 178078
As suggested by Bill Schmidt (in reviewing r178067), use the real register
number bit lengths (which is self-documenting, and prevents using illegal
numbers), and set only the relevant bits in HWEncoding (which defaults to 0).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 178077
As pointed out by Richard Sandiford, my recent updates to the register
scavenger broke targets that use custom spilling (because the new code assumed
that if there were no valid spill slots, than spilling would be impossible).
I don't have a test case, but it should be possible to create one for Thumb 1,
Mips 16, etc.
llvm-svn: 178073
As pointed out by Jakob, we don't need to maintain a separate
register-numbering table. Instead we should let TableGen generate the table for
us from the information (already present) in PPCRegisterInfo.td.
TRI->getEncodingValue is now used to access register-encoding values.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 178067
Akira Hatanaka