Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178127
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178126
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 178125
Some implementation detail in the forgotten past required the link
register to be placed in the GPRC and G8RC register classes. This is
just wrong on the face of it, and causes several extra intersection
register classes to be generated. I found this was having evil
effects on instruction scheduling, by causing the wrong register class
to be consulted for register pressure decisions.
No code generation changes are expected, other than some minor changes
in instruction order. Seven tests in the test bucket required minor
tweaks to adjust to the new normal.
llvm-svn: 178114
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
llvm-svn: 178099
As Bill Schmidt pointed out to me, only on Darwin do we need to spill/restore
VRSAVE in the SjLj code. For non-Darwin, don't spill/restore VRSAVE (and I've
added some asserts to make sure that we're not).
As it turns out, we're not currently handling the Darwin case correctly (I've
added a FIXME in the test case). I've tried adding various implied register
definitions/uses to force the spill without success, so I'll need to address
this later.
llvm-svn: 178096
All Intel CPUs since Yonah look a lot alike, at least at the granularity
of the scheduling models. We can add more accurate models for
processors that aren't Sandy Bridge if required. Haswell will probably
need its own.
The Atom processor and anything based on NetBurst is completely
different. So are the non-Intel chips.
llvm-svn: 178080
Now that the register scavenger can support multiple spill slots, and PEI can
use virtual-register-based scavenging for multiple simultaneous registers, we
can use a virtual register for the transfer register in the CR spilling code.
This should eliminate the last place (outside of the prologue/epilogue) where
we depend on the unconditional availability of the r0 register. We will soon be
able to allocate it (in a somewhat restricted sense) as a GPR.
llvm-svn: 178060
The previous algorithm could not deal properly with scavenging multiple virtual
registers because it kept only one live virtual -> physical mapping (and
iterated through operands in order). Now we don't maintain a current mapping,
but rather use replaceRegWith to completely remove the virtual register as
soon as the mapping is established.
In order to allow the register scavenger to return a physical register killed
by an instruction for definition by that same instruction, we now call
RS->forward(I) prior to eliminating virtual registers defined in I. This
requires a minor update to forward to ignore virtual registers.
These new features will be tested in forthcoming commits.
llvm-svn: 178058
- 'prefetch' intrinsics are only lowered when SSE is available. On non-X86
builds, 'generic' CPU is used and stops lowering any prefetch intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 178046
- It's still considered aligned when the specified alignment is larger
than the natural alignment;
- The new alignment for the high 128-bit vector should be min(16,
alignment) as the pointer is advanced by 16, a power-of-2 offset.
llvm-svn: 177947
- Handle the case where the result of 'insert_subvect' is bitcasted
before 'extract_subvec'. This removes the redundant insertf128/extractf128
pair on unaligned 256-bit vector load/store on vectors of non 64-bit integer.
llvm-svn: 177945
For instance, following transformation will be disabled:
x + x + x => 3.0f * x;
The problem of these transformations is that it introduces a FP constant, which
following Instruction-Selection pass cannot handle.
Reviewed by Nadav, thanks a lot!
rdar://13445387
llvm-svn: 177933
test/CodeGen/Generic/2008-02-20-MatchingMem.ll: Test contains inline assembly not supported by Hexagon.
Following tests are XFAILed due to multiple return values which Hexagon doesn't support.
test/CodeGen/Generic/multiple-return-values-cross-block-with-invoke.ll
test/CodeGen/Generic/select-cc.ll
test/CodeGen/Generic/vector.ll
llvm-svn: 177912
Performing this check unilaterally prevented us from generating FMAs when the incoming IR contained illegal vector types which would eventually be legalized to underlying types that *did* support FMA.
For example, an @llvm.fmuladd on an OpenCL float16 should become a sequence of float4 FMAs, not float4 fmul+fadd's.
NOTE: Because we still call the target-specific profitability hook, individual targets can reinstate the old behavior, if desired, by simply performing the legality check inside their callback hook. They can also perform more sophisticated legality checks, if, for example, some illegal vector types can be productively implemented as FMAs, but not others.
llvm-svn: 177820
Thanks to Jakob for isolating the underlying problem from the
test case in r177423. The original commit had introduced
asymmetric copy operations, but these turned out to be a work-around
to the real problem (the use of == instead of hasSubClassEq in PPCCTRLoops).
llvm-svn: 177679
This implements SJLJ lowering on PPC, making the Clang functions
__builtin_{setjmp/longjmp} functional on PPC platforms. The implementation
strategy is similar to that on X86, with the exception that a branch-and-link
variant is used to get the right jump address. Credit goes to Bill Schmidt for
suggesting the use of the unconditional bcl form (instead of the regular bl
instruction) to limit return-address-cache pollution.
Benchmarking the speed at -O3 of:
static jmp_buf env_sigill;
void foo() {
__builtin_longjmp(env_sigill,1);
}
main() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < c; ++i) {
if (__builtin_setjmp(env_sigill)) {
goto done;
} else {
foo();
}
done:;
}
...
}
vs. the same code using the libc setjmp/longjmp functions on a P7 shows that
this builtin implementation is ~4x faster with Altivec enabled and ~7.25x
faster with Altivec disabled. This comparison is somewhat unfair because the
libc version must also save/restore the VSX registers which we don't yet
support.
llvm-svn: 177666
Although there is only one Altivec VRSAVE register, it is a member of
a register class, and we need the ability to spill it. Because this
register is normally callee-preserved and handled by special code this
has never before been necessary. However, this capability will be required by
a forthcoming commit adding SjLj support.
llvm-svn: 177654
The old code used to lower FRAMEADDR tried to replicate the logic in the real
frame-lowering code that determines whether or not the frame pointer (r31) will
be used. When it seemed as through the frame pointer would not be used, the
stack pointer (r1) was used instead. Unfortunately, because the stack size is
not yet known, this does not work. Instead, this change introduces new
always-reserved pseudo-registers (FP and FP8) that are replaced during prologue
insertion with the real frame-pointer register (either r1 or r31).
It is important that this intrinsic always return a valid frame address because
it is used by Clang to store the frame address as part of code generation for
__builtin_setjmp.
llvm-svn: 177653
NEON is not IEEE 754 compliant, so we should avoid lowering single-precision
floating point operations with NEON unless unsafe-math is turned on. The
equivalent VFP instructions are IEEE 754 compliant, but in some cores they're
much slower, so some archs/OSs might still request it to be on by default,
such as Swift and Darwin.
llvm-svn: 177651
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.
llvm-svn: 177467
A node's ordering is only propagated during legalization if (a) the new node does
not have an ordering (is not a CSE'd node), or (b) the new node has an ordering
that is higher than the node being legalized.
llvm-svn: 177465
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
llvm-svn: 177462
Currently, pre-increment store patterns are written to use two separate
operands to represent address base and displacement:
stwu $rS, $ptroff($ptrreg)
This causes problems when implementing the assembler parser, so this
commit changes the patterns to use standard (complex) memory operands
like in all other memory access instruction patterns:
stwu $rS, $dst
To still match those instructions against the appropriate pre_store
SelectionDAG nodes, the patch uses the new feature that allows a Pat
to match multiple DAG operands against a single (complex) instruction
operand.
Approved by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 177429
Currently the PPC r0 register is unconditionally reserved. There are two reasons
for this:
1. r0 is treated specially (as the constant 0) by certain instructions, and so
cannot be used with those instructions as a regular register.
2. r0 is used as a temporary register in the CR-register spilling process
(where, under some circumstances, we require two GPRs).
This change addresses the first reason by introducing a restricted register
class (without r0) for use by those instructions that treat r0 specially. These
register classes have a new pseudo-register, ZERO, which represents the r0-as-0
use. This has the side benefit of making the existing target code simpler (and
easier to understand), and will make it clear to the register allocator that
uses of r0 as 0 don't conflict will real uses of the r0 register.
Once the CR spilling code is improved, we'll be able to allocate r0.
Adding these extra register classes, for some reason unclear to me, causes
requests to the target to copy 32-bit registers to 64-bit registers. The
resulting code seems correct (and causes no test-suite failures), and the new
test case covers this new kind of asymmetric copy.
As r0 is still reserved, no functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177423
Silviu Baranga