This generally follows what other targets do. I don't completely
understand why the special case for tail calls existed in the first
place; even when the code was committed in r105413, call lowering didn't
work in the way described in the comments.
Stack protector lowering breaks if the register copies are not glued to
a tail call: we have to insert the stack protector check before the tail
call, and we choose the location based on the assumption that all
physical register dependencies of a tail call are adjacent to the tail
call. (See FindSplitPointForStackProtector.) This is sort of fragile,
but I don't see any reason to break that assumption.
I'm guessing nobody has seen this before just because it's hard to
convince the scheduler to actually schedule the code in a way that
breaks; even without the glue, the only computation that could actually
be scheduled after the register copies is the computation of the call
address, and the scheduler usually prefers to schedule that before the
copies anyway.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41417
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60427
llvm-svn: 360099
The MachineFunction wasn't used in getOptimalMemOpType, but more importantly,
this allows reuse of findOptimalMemOpLowering that is calling getOptimalMemOpType.
This is the groundwork for the changes in D59766 and D59787, that allows
implementation of TTI::getMemcpyCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59785
llvm-svn: 359537
This does two main things, firstly adding some at least basic addressing modes
for i64 types, and secondly treats floats and doubles sensibly when there is no
fpu. The floating point change can help codesize in some cases, especially with
D60294.
Most backends seems to not consider the exact VT in isLegalAddressingMode,
instead switching on type size. That is now what this does when the target does
not have an fpu (as the float data will be loaded using LDR's). i64's currently
use the address range of an LDRD (even though they may be legalised and loaded
with an LDR). This is at least better than marking them all as illegal
addressing modes.
I have not attempted to do much with vectors yet. That will need changing once
MVE is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60677
llvm-svn: 358845
As discussed on PR41359, this patch renames the pair of shift-mask target feature functions to make their purposes more obvious.
shouldFoldShiftPairToMask -> shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask
preferShiftsToClearExtremeBits -> shouldFoldMaskToVariableShiftPair
llvm-svn: 358526
There's an existing optimization for x != C, but somehow it was missing
a special case for 0.
While I'm here, also cleaned up the code/comments a bit: the second
value produced by the MERGE_VALUES was actually dead, since a CMOV only
produces one result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59616
llvm-svn: 357437
This should hopefully lead to minor improvements in code generation, and
more accurate spill/reload comments in assembly.
Also fix isLoadFromStackSlotPostFE/isStoreToStackSlotPostFE so they
don't lead to misleading assembly comments for merged memory operands;
this is technically orthogonal, but in practice the relevant memory
operand lists don't show up without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59713
llvm-svn: 356963
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
llvm-svn: 356468
This allows better code size for aarch64 floating point materialization
in a future patch.
Reviewers: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58690
llvm-svn: 356389
I am about to introduce some non-power-of-2 width vector MVTs. This
commit fixes a power-of-2 assumption that my forthcoming change would
otherwise break, as shown by test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt_combine.ll and
vdiv_combine.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58927
Change-Id: I56a282e365d3874ab0621e5bdef98a612f702317
llvm-svn: 356341
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
When lowering a select_cc node where the true and false values are of type f16,
we can't use a general conditional move because the FP16 instructions do not
support conditional execution. Instead, we must ensure that the condition code
is one of the four supported by the VSEL instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58813
llvm-svn: 355385
This function was not checking for the condition code variants which are
undefined if either input is NaN, so we were missing selection of the VSEL
instruction in some cases when using -fno-honor-nans or -ffast-math.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58812
llvm-svn: 355199
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
llvm-svn: 355099
In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attributes. A subtarget is created on a
per-function basis, so it's possible to know when we're compiling for
code size on construction so record this in the new object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57812
llvm-svn: 353501
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
This patch may seem familiar... but my previous patch handled the
equivalent lsls+and, not this case. Usually instcombine puts the
"and" after the shift, so this case doesn't come up. However, if the
shift comes out of a GEP, it won't get canonicalized by instcombine,
and DAGCombine doesn't have an equivalent transform.
This also modifies isDesirableToCommuteWithShift to suppress DAGCombine
transforms which would make the overall code worse.
I'm not really happy adding a bunch of code to handle this, but it would
probably be tricky to substantially improve the behavior of DAGCombine
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56032
llvm-svn: 351776
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch adds the sign/zero extension done by
vgetlane to ARM computeKnownBitsForTargetNode.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56098
llvm-svn: 350553
This saves materializing the immediate. The additional forms are less
common (they don't usually show up for bitfield insert/extract), but
they're still relevant.
I had to add a new target hook to prevent DAGCombine from reversing the
transform. That isn't the only possible way to solve the conflict, but
it seems straightforward enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55630
llvm-svn: 349857
These features (fairly) recently got split out into their own feature, so we
should make CodeGen use them when available. The main change here is that the
check used to be based on the triple, but now it's based on CPU features.
llvm-svn: 349355
This has two positive effects. First, using a custom node prevents
recombination leading to an infinite loop since the output DAG is notionally a
little more complex than the input one. Using a flag-setting instruction also
allows the subtraction to be folded with the related comparison more easily.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53190
llvm-svn: 348122
Don't expand SDIV with an immediate that is a power of 2 if we optimise for
minimum code size. For example:
sdiv %1, i32 4
gets expanded to a sequence of 3 instructions, but this is suboptimal for
minimum code size so instead we just generate a MOV and a SDIV if integer
division is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54546
llvm-svn: 347965
The lowering was missing live-ins in certain cases, like a sequence of
multiple tMOVCCr_pseudo instructions. This would lead to a verifier
failure, and on pre-v6 Thumb CPSR would be incorrectly clobbered.
For reasons I don't completely understand, it's hard to get a sequence
of multiple tMOVCCr_pseudo instructions; the issue only seems to show up
with 64-bit comparisons where the result is zero-extended. I added some
extra testcases in case that changes in the future. Probably some
optimization opportunities here if anyone is interested. (@test_slt_not
is the case that was getting miscompiled.)
The code to check the liveness of CPSR was stolen from
X86ISelLowering.cpp; maybe it could be refactored into common helper,
but I have no idea where to put it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54192
llvm-svn: 346355
Summary:
Changes all uses of minnan/maxnan to minimum/maximum
globally. These names emphasize that the semantic difference between
these operations is more than just NaN-propagation.
Reviewers: arsenm, aheejin, dschuff, javed.absar
Subscribers: jholewinski, sdardis, wdng, sbc100, jgravelle-google, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53112
llvm-svn: 345218
The BKPT instruction is specified to cause a software breakpoint,
and at least on Linux results in a SIGTRAP. This makes it more
suitable for implementing debugtrap than TRAP (aka UDF #254), which
is specified to cause an undefined instruction exception and results
in a SIGILL on Linux.
Moreover, BKPT is not marked as a terminator, which is not only
consistent with the IR instruction but allows the analyzeBlock
function to correctly analyze a basic block containing the instruction,
which fixes an assertion failure in the machine block placement pass
previously triggered by the included test case.
Because BKPT is only supported starting with ARMv5T, we continue to
use UDF #254 when targeting v4T.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53614
llvm-svn: 345171
A global alias may use indices which are not considered in bounds. In
such a case, accessing the base object will fail as it only peers
through inbounds accesses. This pattern is used by the swift compiler
to create references to preceeding members in the type metadata. This
would cause the code generation to fail when targeting a platform that
used ELF as the object file format. Be conservative and fail the
read-only check if we run into an alias that we cannot peer through.
llvm-svn: 345107
As I suggested on PR39281, this patch uses PADDL pairwise addition to widen from the vXi8 CTPOP result to the target vector type.
This is a blocker for moving more x86 code to generic vector CTPOP expansion (P32655 + D53258) - ARM's vXi64 CTPOP currently expands, which would generate a vXi64 MUL but ARM's custom lowering expands the general MUL case and vectors aren't well handled in LegalizeDAG - improving the CTPOP lowering was a lot easier than fixing the MUL lowering for this one case......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53257
llvm-svn: 344512
Correctly check for relocations in the constant to promote. And don't
allow promoting a constant multiple times.
This partially fixes https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32780 ;
it's not a complete fix because we also need to prevent
ARMConstantIslands from cloning the constant.
(-arm-promote-constant is currently off by default, and it stays off
with this patch. I'll look into turning it on again when all the known
issues are fixed.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51472
llvm-svn: 343361
This mostly affects IR generated by non-clang frontends because clang
generally sets the alignment of globals explicitly.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32394 .
(-arm-promote-constant is currently off by default, and it stays off
with this patch. I'll look into turning it on again when all the known
issues are fixed.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51469
llvm-svn: 343359
This involves changing the shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR interface, but I have
updated the in-tree backends using this hook (ARM, AArch64, Hexagon) so they
will see no functional change. Previously this hook returned bool, but it now
returns AtomicExpansionKind.
This hook allows targets to select how a given cmpxchg is to be expanded.
D48131 uses this to expand part-word cmpxchg to a target-specific intrinsic.
See my associated RFC for more info on the motivation for this change
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48130
llvm-svn: 342550
The Technical Reference Manuals for these two CPUs state that branching
to an unaligned 32-bit instruction incurs an extra pipeline reload
penalty. That's bad.
This also enables the optimization at -Os since it costs on average one
byte per loop in return for 1 cycle per iteration, which is pretty good
going.
llvm-svn: 342127
On Windows, if shouldAssumeDSOLocal returns false, it's either a
dllimport reference, or a reference that we should treat as non-local
and create a stub for.
Clean up AArch64Subtarget::ClassifyGlobalReference a little while
touching the flag handling relating to dllimport.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51590
llvm-svn: 341402
The runtime pseudo relocations can't handle the ARM format embedded
addresses in movw/movt pairs. By using stubs, the potentially
dllimported addresses can be touched up by the runtime pseudo relocation
framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51450
llvm-svn: 341176
The inline sequence is very long (about 70 bytes on Thumb1), so it's
not really a good idea to inline it, especially when optimizing for
size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47917
llvm-svn: 340458
This avoids a potential infinite loop setting and unsetting bits in the
mask.
Reduced from a failure on the polly-aosp bot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51066
llvm-svn: 340446
This adds the plumbing for the Tiny code model for the AArch64 backend. This,
instead of loading addresses through the normal ADRP;ADD pair used in the Small
model, uses a single ADR. The 21 bit range of an ADR means that the code and
its statically defined symbols need to be within 1MB of each other.
This makes it mostly interesting for embedded applications where we want to fit
as much as we can in as small a space as possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49673
llvm-svn: 340397
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely to
lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally a bad
idea.
To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM backend
disable the transforms in question.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667
llvm-svn: 339734
LLVM normally prefers to minimize the number of bits set in an AND
immediate, but that doesn't always match the available ARM instructions.
In Thumb1 mode, prefer uxtb or uxth where possible; otherwise, prefer
a two-instruction sequence movs+ands or movs+bics.
Some potential improvements outlined in
ARMTargetLowering::targetShrinkDemandedConstant, but seems to work
pretty well already.
The ARMISelDAGToDAG fix ensures we don't generate an invalid UBFX
instruction due to a larger-than-expected mask. (It's orthogonal, in
some sense, but as far as I can tell it's either impossible or nearly
impossible to reproduce the bug without this change.)
According to my testing, this seems to consistently improve codesize by
a small amount by forming bic more often for ISD::AND with an immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50030
llvm-svn: 339472
Eli Friedman