Move it out from under the constant check, reorder
predicates, add comments. This makes it easier to
extend to handle the non-constant case.
llvm-svn: 348284
After TimePoint's precision was increased in LLVM we started seeing
failures because the modification times didn't match. This adds a time
cast to ensure that we're comparing TimePoints with the same amount of
precision.
llvm-svn: 348283
Add a static_assert checking that no type class is polymorphic.
People should use LLVM style RTTI instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55225
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348281
This reverts commit r348154 and follow-up commits r348211 and r3248213.
Reason: the original commit broke compiler-rt tests and a follow-up fix
(r348203) broke our integrate and was reverted.
llvm-svn: 348280
This reverts commit r348203.
Reason: this produces absolute paths in .gcno files, breaking us
internally as we rely on them being consistent with the filenames passed
in the command line.
Also reverts r348157 and r348155 to account for revert of r348154 in
clang repository.
llvm-svn: 348279
Add a static_assert checking that no statement/expression class
is polymorphic. People should use LLVM style RTTI instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55222
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348278
ArrayTypeTraitExpr is the only expression class which is polymorphic.
As far as I can tell this is completely pointless.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55221
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 348276
There's a potential small enhancement to this code that could
solve the cases currently under proposal in D54827 via SimplifyCFG.
Whether instcombine should be doing this kind of semi-non-local
analysis in the first place is an open question, but separating
the logic out can only help if/when we decide to move it to a
different pass.
AFAICT, any proposal to do this in SimplifyCFG could also be seen
as an overreach + it would be incomplete to start the fold from a
branch rather than an icmp.
There's another question here about the code for processUGT_ADDCST_ADD().
That part may be completely dead after rL234638 ?
llvm-svn: 348273
Critical regions in NVPTX are the constructs, which, generally speaking,
are not supported by the NVPTX target. Instead we're using special
technique to handle the critical regions. Currently they are supported
only within the loop and all the threads in the loop must execute the
same critical region.
Inside of this special regions the regions still must be emitted as
critical, to avoid possible data races between the teams +
synchronization must use __kmpc_barrier functions.
llvm-svn: 348272
__kmpc_barrier runtime functions must be marked as convergent to prevent
some dangerous optimizations. Also, for NVPTX target all barriers must
be emitted as simple barriers.
llvm-svn: 348271
When debugging a boost build with a modified
version of Clang, I discovered that the PTH implementation
stores TokenKind in 8 bits. However, we currently have 368
TokenKinds.
The result is that the value gets truncated and the wrong token
gets picked up when including PTH files. It seems that this will
go wrong every time someone uses a token that uses the 9th bit.
Upon asking on IRC, it was brought up that this was a highly
experimental features that was considered a failure. I discovered
via googling that BoostBuild (mostly Boost.Math) is the only user of
this
feature, using the CC1 flag directly. I believe that this can be
transferred over to normal PCH with minimal effort:
https://github.com/boostorg/build/issues/367
Based on advice on IRC and research showing that this is a nearly
completely unused feature, this patch removes it entirely.
Note: I considered leaving the build-flags in place and making them
emit an error/warning, however since I've basically identified and
warned the only user, it seemed better to just remove them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54547
Change-Id: If32744275ef1f585357bd6c1c813d96973c4d8d9
llvm-svn: 348266
Summary:
Previously we weren't testing this function in the unit tests.
Reviewers: kcc, cryptoad, dvyukov, eugenis, kubamracek
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54861
llvm-svn: 348260
When linking the linux kernel on ppc64le
ld.lld -EL -m elf64lppc -Bstatic --orphan-handling=warn --build-id -o
.tmp_vmlinux1 -T ./arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds --whole-archive
built-in.a --no-whole-archive --start-group lib/lib.a --end-group
ld.lld: error: discarding .rela.plt section is not allowed
The linker script discards with the following matches
*(.glink .iplt .plt .rela* .comment)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54871
llvm-svn: 348258
When linking the linux kernel on ppc64 and ppc
ld.lld: error: unrecognized reloc 11
11 is PPC_REL14 and PPC64_REL14
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54868
llvm-svn: 348255
Summary:
Partitions include graphs in auto-index so that each shards contains
only part of the include graph related to itself.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55062
llvm-svn: 348252
PR17686 demonstrates that for some targets FP exceptions can fire in cases where the FP_TO_UINT is expanded using a FP_TO_SINT instruction.
The existing code converts both the inrange and outofrange cases using FP_TO_SINT and then selects the result, this patch changes this for 'strict' cases to pre-select the FP_TO_SINT input and the offset adjustment.
The X87 cases don't need the strict flag but generates much nicer code with it....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53794
llvm-svn: 348251
Summary:
r348240 assumes that an expression contains the Objective C option if
Objective C Runtime is found. But on MacOS X it seems that the test application
process always contains Objective C Runtime, so the test fails when it assumes
that the language is C++ only. Skip this part on Darwin.
llvm-svn: 348250
As of rev. 268898, clang supports __float128 on SystemZ. This seems to
have been in error. GCC has never supported __float128 on SystemZ,
since the "long double" type on the platform is already IEEE-128. (GCC
only supports __float128 on platforms where "long double" is some other
data type.)
For compatibility reasons this patch removes __float128 on SystemZ
again. The test case is updated accordingly.
llvm-svn: 348247
Add support for ISD::*_EXTEND and ISD::*_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG opcodes.
The extra broadcast in trunc-subvector.ll will be fixed in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 348246
Previously, the iterator range checker only warned upon dereferencing of
iterators outside their valid range as well as increments and decrements of
out-of-range iterators where the result remains out-of-range. However, the C++
standard is more strict than this: decrementing begin() or incrementing end()
results in undefined behaviour even if the iterator is not dereferenced
afterwards. Coming back to the range once out-of-range is also undefined.
This patch corrects the behaviour of the iterator range checker: warnings are
given for any operation whose result is ahead of begin() or past the end()
(which is the past-end iterator itself, thus now we are speaking of past
past-the-end).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53812
llvm-svn: 348245
If an iterator is represented by a derived C++ class but its comparison operator
is for its base the iterator checkers cannot recognize the iterators compared.
This results in false positives in very straightforward cases (range error when
dereferencing an iterator after disclosing that it is equal to the past-the-end
iterator).
To overcome this problem we always use the region of the topmost base class for
iterators stored in a region. A new method called getMostDerivedObjectRegion()
was added to the MemRegion class to get this region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54466
llvm-svn: 348244
Summary:
This patch adds the check of the language before ignoring names like `id` or
`Class`, which are reserved in Objective C, but are allowed in C++. It is needed
to make it possible to evaluate expressions in a C++ program containing names
like `id` or `Class`.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: jingham, clayborg
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54843
llvm-svn: 348240
Summary:
In our codebase, `static_assert(std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`
(where `some_type_trait` is an std type_trait and `Ts...` is the
appropriate template parameters) account for 11.2% of the `static_assert`s.
In these cases, the `Ts` are typically not spelled out explicitly, e.g.
`static_assert(std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value, "message");`
The diagnostic when the assert fails is typically not very useful, e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value' "message"`
This change makes the diagnostic spell out the types explicitly , e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<int, float>::value' "message"`
See tests for more examples.
After this is submitted, I intend to handle
`static_assert(!std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`,
which is another 6.6% of static_asserts.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54903
llvm-svn: 348239
We only needed this because it provided really aggressive constant folding even through constant pool entries created from build_vectors. The main case was for vXi8 MULH legalization which was happening as part of legalize DAG instead of as part of legalize vector ops. Now its part of vector op legalization and we've added special handling for build vectors of all constants there. This has removed the need for this code on the list tests we have.
llvm-svn: 348237
This finishes the soft-transition to the new primitive that implements
priority inheritance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55244
llvm-svn: 348236
Includes "resize" and "shrink" because they can reset the object to a known
state in certain circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54563
llvm-svn: 348235
Sanjay Patel