On Linux both version of the INTERCEPT_FUNCTION macro now return true
when interception was successful. Adapt and cleanup some usages.
Also note that `&(func) == &WRAP(func)` is a link-time property, but we
do a runtime check.
Tested on Linux and macOS.
Previous attempt reverted by: 5642c3feb0
This attempt to bring order to the interceptor macro goes the other
direction and aligns the Linux implementation with the way things are
done on Windows.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61358
llvm-svn: 359725
Changing INTERCEPT_FUNCTION to return void is not functionally correct.
IMO the best way to communicate failure or success of interception is
with a return value, not some external address comparison.
This change was also creating link errors for _except_handler4_common,
which is exported from ucrtbase.dll in 32-bit Windows.
Also revert dependent changes r359362 and r359466.
llvm-svn: 359611
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
Summary:
Unlike the rest of the sanitizer code, lib/interception uses native macros like __linux__
to check for specific targets instead of the common ones like SANITIZER_LINUX.
When working on the Solaris port of the sanitizers, the current style was found to not
only be inconsistent, but clumsy to use because the canonical way to check for Solaris
is to check for __sun__ && __svr4__ which is a mouthful.
Therefore, this patch switches to use SANITIZER_* macros instead.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: #sanitizers, srhines, krytarowski, llvm-commits, fedor.sergeev
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39798
llvm-svn: 319906
If the lookup using RTLD_NEXT failed, the sanitizer runtime library
is later in the library search order than the DSO that we are trying
to intercept, which means that we cannot intercept this function. We
still want the address of the real definition, though, so look it up
using RTLD_DEFAULT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39779
llvm-svn: 317930
Summary:
Part of the code inspired by the original work on libsanitizer in GCC 5.4 by Christos Zoulas.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, kcc, vitalybuka, filcab
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36321
llvm-svn: 310351
The idea isthat asan/tsan can survive if user intercepts the same functions. At the same time user has an ability to call back into asan/tsan runtime. See the following tests for examples:
asan/output_tests/interception_failure_test-linux.cc
asan/output_tests/interception_test-linux.cc
asan/output_tests/interception_malloc_test-linux.cc
llvm-svn: 157388
Serge Guelton