Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between Jcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, courbet, gchatelet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, eraman, hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60228
llvm-svn: 357802
Summary:
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes translation switches for converting between SETcc instructions and condition codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate. We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60138
llvm-svn: 357801
Summary:
Reorder the condition code enum to match their encodings. Move it to MC layer so it can be used by the scheduler models.
This avoids needing an isel pattern for each condition code. And it removes
translation switches for converting between CMOV instructions and condition
codes.
Now the printer, encoder and disassembler take care of converting the immediate.
We use InstAliases to handle the assembly matching. But we print using the
asm string in the instruction definition. The instruction itself is marked
IsCodeGenOnly=1 to hide it from the assembly parser.
This does complicate the scheduler models a little since we can't assign the
A and BE instructions to a separate class now.
I plan to make similar changes for SETcc and Jcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, lebedev.ri, andreadb, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, hiraditya, kristina, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60041
llvm-svn: 357800
Second half of PR40800, this patch adds DAG undef handling to fcmp instructions to match the behavior in llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction, this permits constant folding of vector comparisons where some elements had been reduced to UNDEF (by SimplifyDemandedVectorElts etc.).
This involves a lot of tweaking to reduced tests as bugpoint loves to reduce fcmp arguments to undef........
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60006
llvm-svn: 357765
There are a variety of vector patterns that may be profitably reduced to a
scalar op when scalar ops are performed using a subset (typically, the
first lane) of the vector register file.
For x86, this is true for float/double ops and element 0 because
insert/extract is just a sub-register rename.
Other targets should likely enable the hook in a similar way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60150
llvm-svn: 357760
Recent change rL357393 uses MachineInstrBuilder::addDisp to add a based on a
BlockAddress but this case was not implemented.
This patch adds the missing case and a test for RISC-V that exercises the new
case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60136
llvm-svn: 357752
Summary:
Teach SelectionDAG how to compute known bits of ISD::CopyFromReg if
the virtual reg used has one def only.
This can be particularly useful when calling isBaseWithConstantOffset()
with the ISD::CopyFromReg argument, as more optimizations may get enabled
in the result.
Also add a missing truncation on X86, found by testing of this patch.
Change-Id: Id1c9fceec862d118c54a5b53adf72ada5d6daefa
Reviewers: bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, jsji, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59535
llvm-svn: 357745
We already promote SRL and SHL to i32.
This will introduce sign extends sometimes which might be harder to deal with than the zero we use for promoting SRL. I ran this through some of our internal benchmark lists and didn't see any major regressions.
I think there might be some DAG combine improvement opportunities in the test changes here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60278
llvm-svn: 357743
Lowering safepoint checks that all gc.relocaes observed in safepoint
must be lowered. However Fast-Isel is able to skip dead gc.relocate.
To resolve this issue we just ignore dead gc.relocate in the check.
Reviewers: reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60184
llvm-svn: 357742
It unnecessarily breaks previously-working code which used varargs,
but didn't pass any float/double arguments (such as EDK2).
Also revert the fixup on top of that:
Revert [X86] Fix a test from r357317
This reverts r357317 (git commit d413f41de6)
This reverts r357380 (git commit 7af32444b9)
llvm-svn: 357718
This function is responsible for checking the legality of fusing an instance
of load -> op -> store into a single operation. In the SystemZ backend the
check was incomplete and a test case emerged with a cycle in the instruction
selection DAG as a result.
Instead of using the NodeIds to determine node relationships,
hasPredecessorHelper() now is used just like in the X86 backend. This handled
the failing tests and as well gave a few additional transformations on
benchmarks.
The SystemZ isFusableLoadOpStorePattern() is now a very near copy of the X86
function, and it seems this could be made a utility function in common code
instead.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60255
llvm-svn: 357688
SUBREG_TO_REG is supposed to be used to assert that we know the upper bits are
zero. But that isn't the case here. We've done no analysis of the inputs.
llvm-svn: 357673
The Fast ISel has a fallback to SelectionDAGISel in case it cannot handle the instruction.
This works as follows:
Using reverse order, try to select instruction using Fast ISel, if it cannot handle instruction it fallbacks to SelectionDAGISel
for these instructions if it is a call and continue fast instruction selections.
However if unhandled instruction is not a call or statepoint related instruction it fallbacks to SelectionDAGISel for all remaining
instructions in basic block.
However gc.result instruction is missed and as a result it is possible that gc.result is processed earlier than statepoint
causing breakage invariant the gc.results should be handled after statepoint.
Test is updated because in the current form fast-isel cannot handle ret instruction (due to i1 ret type without explicit ext)
and as a result test does not check fast-isel at all.
Reviewers: reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60182
llvm-svn: 357672
This revision causes tests to fail under ASAN. Since the cause of the failures
is not clear (could be ASAN, could be a Clang bug, could be a bug in this
revision), the safest course of action seems to be to revert while investigating.
llvm-svn: 357667
These inserters inserted some instructions to zero some registers and copied from virtual registers to physical registers.
This change instead inserts the zeros directly into the DAG at lowering time using new ISD opcodes
that take the extra zeroes as inputs. The zeros will then go through isel on their own to select
the MOV32r0 pseudo. Then we just need to mention the physical registers directly
in the isel patterns and the isel table and InstrEmitter will take care of inserting the necessary
copies to/from physical registers.
llvm-svn: 357659
This custom inserter existed so we could do a weird thing where we pretended that the instructions support
a full address mode instead of taking a pointer in EAX/RAX. I think was largely so we could be pointer
size agnostic in the isel pattern.
To make this work we would then put the address into an LEA into EAX/RAX in front of the instruction after
isel. But the LEA is overkill when we just have a base pointer. So we end up using the LEA as a slower MOV
instruction.
With this change we now just do custom selection during isel instead and just assign the incoming address
of the intrinsic into EAX/RAX based on its size. After the intrinsic is selected, we can let isel take
care of selecting an LEA or other operation to do any address computation needed in this basic block.
I've also split the instruction into a 32-bit mode version and a 64-bit mode version so the implicit
use is properly sized based on the pointer. Without this we get comments in the assembly output about
killing eax and defing rax or vice versa depending on whether we define the instruction to use EAX/RAX.
llvm-svn: 357652
This pattern would show up as a regression if we more
aggressively convert vector FP ops to scalar ops.
There's still a missed optimization for the v4f64 legal
case (AVX) because we create that h-op with an undef operand.
We should probably just duplicate the operands for that
pattern to avoid trouble.
llvm-svn: 357642
Relying on no spill or other code being inserted before this was
precarious. It relied on code diligently checking isBasicBlockPrologue
which is likely to be forgotten.
Ideally this could be done earlier, but this doesn't work because of
phis. Any other instruction can't be placed before them, so we have to
accept the position being incorrect during SSA.
This avoids regressions in the fast register allocator rewrite from
inverting the direction.
llvm-svn: 357634
Same as G_EXP. Add a test, and update legalizer-info-validation.mir and
f16-instructions.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60165
llvm-svn: 357605
When performing an add-with-overflow with an immediate in the
range -2G ... -4G, code currently loads the immediate into a
register, which generally takes two instructions.
In this particular case, it is preferable to load the negated
immediate into a register instead, which always only requires
one instruction, and then perform a subtract.
llvm-svn: 357597
There are 3 changes to make this correspond to the same transform in instcombine:
1. Remove the legality check - we can't create anything less legal than we started with.
2. Ease the use restriction, so we only bail out if both operands have >1 use.
3. Ease the use restriction for binops with a repeated operand (eg, mul x, x).
As discussed in D60150, there's a scalarization opportunity that will be made
easier by allowing this transform more generally.
llvm-svn: 357580
Summary:
Given that X86 does not use this currently, this is an NFC. I'll
experiment with enabling and will report numbers.
Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60185
llvm-svn: 357568
The test should really be checking for the property directly in the
code object headers, but there are problems with this. I don't see
this directly represented in the text form, and for the binary
emission this is depending on a function level subtarget feature to
emit a global flag.
llvm-svn: 357558
In fact we don't even need a loop at all. I backed out the bug fix this was testing for and verified that this new case hit the same issue.
This should stop D59626 from deleting some of this code by realizing it was dead due to the loop.
llvm-svn: 357544
Craig Topper