Test cases were updated to not use the local compilation dir which
is different between development pc and build bots.
Original commit message:
[LLDB] - Support the single file split DWARF.
DWARF5 spec describes a single file split dwarf case
(when .dwo sections are in the .o files).
Problem is that LLDB does not work correctly in that case.
The issue is that, for example, both .debug_info and .debug_info.dwo
has the same type: eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfo. And when code searches
section by type it might find the regular debug section
and not the .dwo one.
The patch fixes that. With it, LLDB is able to work with
output compiled with -gsplit-dwarf=single flag correctly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52403
llvm-svn: 346855
DWARF5 spec describes a single file split dwarf case
(when .dwo sections are in the .o files).
Problem is that LLDB does not work correctly in that case.
The issue is that, for example, both .debug_info and .debug_info.dwo
has the same type: eSectionTypeDWARFDebugInfo. And when code searches
section by type it might find the regular debug section
and not the .dwo one.
The patch fixes that. With it, LLDB is able to work with
output compiled with -gsplit-dwarf=single flag correctly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52296
llvm-svn: 346848
A year or so ago, I re-wrote most of the lit infrastructure in LLVM so
that it wasn't so boilerplate-y. I added lots of common helper type
stuff, simplifed usage patterns, and made the code more elegant and
maintainable.
We migrated to this in LLVM, clang, and lld's lit files, but not in
LLDBs. This started to bite me recently, as the 4 most recent times I
tried to run the lit test suite in LLDB on a fresh checkout the first
thing that would happen is that python would just start crashing with
unhelpful backtraces and I would have to spend time investigating.
You can reproduce this today by doing a fresh cmake generation, doing
ninja lldb and then python bin/llvm-lit.py -sv ~/lldb/lit/SymbolFile at
which point you'll get a segfault that tells you nothing about what your
problem is.
I started trying to fix the issues with bandaids, but it became clear
that the proper solution was to just bring in the work I did in the rest
of the projects. The side benefit of this is that the lit configuration
files become much cleaner and more understandable as a result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54009
llvm-svn: 346008
This adds support for DW_RLE_base_addressx, DW_RLE_startx_endx,
DW_RLE_startx_length, DW_FORM_rnglistx.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53929
llvm-svn: 345958
This adds the support for DW_FORM_addrx, DW_FORM_addrx1,
DW_FORM_addrx2, DW_FORM_addrx3, DW_FORM_addrx4 forms.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53813
llvm-svn: 345706
With the fix: do not forget to hanlde the DW_RLE_start_end, which seems was
omited/forgotten/removed by mistake.
Original commit message:
The patch implements the support for DW_RLE_base_address and DW_RLE_offset_pair
.debug_rnglists entries
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53140
----
Added : /lldb/trunk/lit/Breakpoint/Inputs/debug_rnglist_offset_pair.yaml
Added : /lldb/trunk/lit/Breakpoint/debug_rnglist_offset_pair.test
Modified : /lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp
Modified : /lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugRanges.cpp
Modified : /lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugRanges.h
Modified : /lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.cpp
Modified : /lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/SymbolFileDWARF.h
llvm-svn: 345251
The patch implements the support for DW_RLE_base_address and DW_RLE_offset_pair
.debug_rnglists entries
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53140
llvm-svn: 345127
DWARF5 describes DW_RLE_start_end as:
This is a form of bounded range entry that has two target address operands.
Each operand is the same size as used in DW_FORM_addr. These indicate
the starting and ending addresses, respectively, that define the address range
for which the following location is valid.
The patch implements the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53193
llvm-svn: 344674
LLDB does not support this DWARF5 form atm.
At least gcc emits it in some cases when doing optimization
for abbreviations.
As far I can tell, clang does not support it yet, though
the rest LLVM code already knows about it.
The patch adds the support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52689
llvm-svn: 344328
This adds a basic support of the .debug_rnglists section.
Only the DW_RLE_start_length and DW_RLE_end_of_list entries are supported.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52981
llvm-svn: 344119
Summary: They all correspond to bugs that are already logged and I've added the appropriate (or most appropriate) bug numbers. This leaves only a handful of failing tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47892
llvm-svn: 334210
Summary:
The command takes two input arguments: a module to use as a debug target
and a file containing a list of commands. The command will execute each
of the breakpoint commands in the file and dump the breakpoint state
after each one.
The commands are expected to be breakpoint set/remove/etc. commands, but
I explicitly allow any lldb command here, so you can do things like
change setting which impact breakpoint resolution, etc. There is also a
"-persistent" flag, which causes lldb-test to *not* automatically clear
the breakpoint list after each command. Right now I don't use it, but
the idea behind it was that it could be used to test more complex
combinations of breakpoint commands (set+modify, set+disable, etc.).
Right now the command prints out only the basic breakpoint state, but
more information can be easily added there. To enable easy matching of
the "at least one breakpoint location found" state, the command
explicitly prints out the string "At least one breakpoint location.".
To enable testing of breakpoints set with an absolute paths, I add the
ability to perform rudimentary substitutions on the commands: right now
the string %p is replaced by the directory which contains the command
file (so, under normal circumstances, this will perform the same
substitution as lit would do for %p).
I use this command to rewrite the TestBreakpointCaseSensitivity test --
the test was checking about a dozen breakpoint commands, but it was
launching a new process for each one, so it took about 90 seconds to
run. The new test takes about 0.3 seconds for me, which is approximately
a 300x speedup.
Reviewers: davide, zturner, jingham
Subscribers: luporl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43686
llvm-svn: 326112
George Rimar