Arguments passed as "byval align" should get the specified alignment
in the parameter save area. There was some code in PPCISelLowering.cpp
that attempted to implement this, but this didn't work correctly:
while code did update the ArgOffset value, it neglected to update
the PtrOff value (which was already computed from the old ArgOffset),
and it also neglected to update GPR_idx -- fields skipped due to
alignment in the save area must likewise be skipped in GPRs.
This patch fixes and simplifies this logic by:
- handling argument offset alignment right at the beginning
of argument processing, using a new helper routine
CalculateStackSlotAlignment (this avoids having to update
PtrOff and other derived values later on)
- not tracking GPR_idx separately, but always computing the
correct GPR_idx for each argument *from* its ArgOffset
- removing some redundant computation in LowerFormalArguments:
MinReservedArea must equal ArgOffset after argument processing,
so there's no use in computing it twice.
[This doesn't change the behavior of the current clang front-end,
since that never creates "byval align" arguments at the moment.
This will change with a follow-on patch, however.]
llvm-svn: 212476
The argument list vector is never used after it has been passed to the
CallLoweringInfo and moving it to the CallLoweringInfo is cleaner and
pretty much as cheap as keeping a pointer to it.
llvm-svn: 212135
I've run into a bug where current LLVM at -O0 (with fast-isel)
generated invalid code like:
ld 0, 20936(1) # 8-byte Folded Reload
stw 12, 10348(0)
stw 12, 10344(0)
The underlying vreg had been introduced as base register by the
Local Stack Slot Allocation pass. That register was constrained
to G8RC by PPCRegisterInfo::materializeFrameBaseRegister to match
the ADDI instruction used to set it, but it was *not* constrained
to G8RC_NOX0 to fit the *use* of the register in an address.
That should have happened in PPCRegisterInfo::resolveFrameIndex.
This patch adds an appropriate constrainRegClass call.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 211897
includes handling DIR_PWR8 where appropriate
The P7Model Itinerary is currently tied in for use under the P8Model, and will be updated later.
llvm-svn: 211779
PR20071 identifies a problem in PowerPC's fast-isel implementation for
floating-point conversion to integer. The fctiduz instruction was added in
Power ISA 2.06 (i.e., Power7 and later). However, this instruction is being
generated regardless of which 64-bit PowerPC target is selected.
The intent is for fast-isel to punt to DAG selection when this instruction is
not available. This patch implements that change. For testing purposes, the
existing fast-isel-conversion.ll test adds a RUN line for -mcpu=970 and tests
for the expected code generation. Additionally, the existing test
fast-isel-conversion-p5.ll was found to be incorrectly expecting the
unavailable instruction to be generated. I've removed these test variants
since we have adequate coverage in fast-isel-conversion.ll.
llvm-svn: 211627
As of r211495, the only remaining users of getMinCallFrameSize are in
core ABI code (LowerFormalParameter / LowerCall). This is actually a
good thing, since the details of the parameter save area are ABI specific.
With the new ELFv2 ABI in particular, the rules defining the size of the
save area will become significantly more complex, so it wouldn't make
sense to implement those outside ABI code that has all required
information.
In preparation, this patch eliminates the getMinCallFrameSize (and
associated getMinCallArgumentsSize) routines, and inlines them into all
callers. Note that since nearly all call arguments are constant, this
allows simplifying the inlined copies to a single line everywhere.
No change in generate code expected.
llvm-svn: 211497
The PPCFrameLowering::determineFrameLayout routine currently ensures
that every function that allocates a stack frame provides space for the
parameter save area (via PPCFrameLowering::getMinCallFrameSize).
This is actually not necessary. There may be functions that never call
another routine but still allocate a frame; those do not require the
parameter save area. In the future, with the ELFv2 ABI, even some
routines that do call other functions do not need to allocate the
parameter save area.
While it is not a bug to allocate the parameter area when it is not
needed, it is better to avoid it to save stack space.
Note that when any particular function call requires the parameter save
area, this space will already have been included by ABI code in the size
the CALLSEQ_START insn is annotated with, and therefore included in the
size returned by MFI->getMaxCallFrameSize().
This means that determineFrameLayout simply does not need to care about
the parameter save area. (It still needs to ensure that every frame
provides the linkage area.) This is implemented by this patch.
Note that this exposed a bug in the new fast-isel code where the parameter
area was *not* included in the CALLSEQ_START size; this is also fixed.
A couple of test cases needed to be adapted for the new (smaller) stack
frame size those tests now see.
llvm-svn: 211495
As remarked in the commit message to r211493, in several places
throughout the 64-bit SVR4 ABI code there are calls to
PPCFrameLowering::getLinkageSize and getMinCallFrameSize
using an incorrect IsDarwin argument of "true".
(Some of those were made explicit by the above refactoring patch, others
have been there all along.)
This patch fixes those places to pass "false" for IsDarwin.
No change in generated code expected.
llvm-svn: 211494
The PPCISelLowering.cpp routines PPCTargetLowering::setMinReservedArea and
CalculateParameterAndLinkageAreaSize are currently used as subroutines
from both 64-bit SVR4 and Darwin ABI code.
However, the two ABIs are already quite different w.r.t. AltiVec
conventions, and they will become more different when the ELFv2 ABI is
supported. Also, in general it seems better to disentangle ABI support
routines for different ABIs to avoid accidentally affecting one ABI when
intending to change only the other.
(Actually, the current code strictly speaking already contains a bug:
these routines call PPCFrameLowering::getMinCallFrameSize and
PPCFrameLowering::getLinkageSize with the IsDarwin parameter set to
"true" even on 64-bit SVR4. This bug currently has no adverse effect
since those routines always return the same for 64-bit SVR4 and 64-bit
Darwin, but it still seems wrong ... I'll fix this in a follow-up
commit shortly.)
To remove this code sharing, I'm simply inlining both routines into all
call sites (there are just two each, one for 64-bit SVR4 and one for
Darwin), and simplifying due to constant parameters where possible.
A small piece of code that *does* make sense to share is refactored into
the new routine EnsureStackAlignment, now also called from 32-bit SVR4
ABI code.
No change in generated code is expected.
llvm-svn: 211493
Current 64-bit SVR4 code seems to have some remnants of Darwin code
in AltiVec argument handing. This had the effect that AltiVec arguments
(or subsequent arguments) were not correctly placed in the parameter area
in some cases.
The correct behaviour with the 64-bit SVR4 ABI is:
- All AltiVec arguments take up space in the parameter area, just like
any other arguments, whether vararg or not.
- They are always 16-byte aligned, skipping a parameter area doubleword
(and the associated GPR, if any), if necessary.
This patch implements the correct behaviour and adds a test case.
(Verified against GCC behaviour via the ABI compat test suite.)
llvm-svn: 211492
When small arguments (structures < 8 bytes or "float") are passed in a
stack slot in the ppc64 SVR4 ABI, they must reside in the least
significant part of that slot. On BE, this means that an offset needs
to be added to the stack address of the parameter, but on LE, the least
significant part of the slot has the same address as the slot itself.
This changes the PowerPC back-end ABI code to only add the small
argument stack slot offset for BE. It also adds test cases to verify
the correct behavior on both BE and LE.
llvm-svn: 211368
When looking at the 64-bit SVR4 indirect call sequence, I noticed
an unnecessary load of r12. And indeed the code says:
// R12 must contain the address of an indirect callee.
But this is not correct; in the 64-bit SVR4 (ELFv1) ABI, there is
no need to load r12 at this point. It seems this code and comment
is a remnant of code originally shared with the Darwin ABI ...
This patch simply removes the unnecessary load.
llvm-svn: 211203
During an indirect function call sequence on the 64-bit SVR4 ABI,
generate code must load and then restore the TOC register.
This does not use a regular LOAD instruction since the TOC
register r2 is marked as reserved. Instead, the are two
special instruction patterns:
let RST = 2, DS = 2 in
def LDinto_toc: DSForm_1a<58, 0, (outs), (ins g8rc:$reg),
"ld 2, 8($reg)", IIC_LdStLD,
[(PPCload_toc i64:$reg)]>, isPPC64;
let RST = 2, DS = 10, RA = 1 in
def LDtoc_restore : DSForm_1a<58, 0, (outs), (ins),
"ld 2, 40(1)", IIC_LdStLD,
[(PPCtoc_restore)]>, isPPC64;
Note that these not only restrict the destination of the
load to r2, but they also restrict the *source* of the
load to particular address combinations. The latter is
a problem when we want to support the ELFv2 ABI, since
there the TOC save slot is no longer at 40(1).
This patch replaces those two instructions with a single
instruction pattern that only hard-codes r2 as destination,
but supports generic addresses as source. This will allow
supporting the ELFv2 ABI, and also helps generate more
efficient code for calls to absolute addresses (allowing
simplification of the ppc64-calls.ll test case).
llvm-svn: 211193
The PowerPC back-end uses BLA to implement calls to functions at
known-constant addresses, which is apparently used for certain
system routines on Darwin.
However, with the 64-bit SVR4 ABI, this is actually incorrect.
An immediate function pointer value on this platform is not
directly usable as a target address for BLA:
- in the ELFv1 ABI, the function pointer value refers to the
*function descriptor*, not the code address
- in the ELFv2 ABI, the function pointer value refers to the
global entry point, but BL(A) would only be correct when
calling the *local* entry point
This bug didn't show up since using immediate function pointer
values is not usually done in the 64-bit SVR4 ABI in the first
place. However, I ran into this issue with a certain use case
of LLVM as JIT, where immediate function pointer values were
uses to implement callbacks from JITted code to helpers in
statically compiled code.
Fixed by simply not using BLA with the 64-bit SVR4 ABI.
llvm-svn: 211174
My patch r204634 to emit instructions in little-endian format failed to
handle those special cases where we emit a pair of instructions from a
single LLVM MC instructions (like the bl; nop pairs used to implement
the call sequence).
In those cases, we still need to emit the "first" instruction (the one
in the more significant word) first, on both big and little endian,
and not swap them.
llvm-svn: 211171
Rafael opened http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19893 to track non-optimal
code generation for forming a function address that is local to the compile
unit. The existing code was treating both local and non-local functions
identically.
This patch fixes the problem by properly identifying local functions and
generating the proper addis/addi code. I also noticed that Rafael's earlier
changes to correct the surrounding code in PPCISelLowering.cpp were also
needed for fast instruction selection in PPCFastISel.cpp, so this patch
fixes that code as well.
The existing test/CodeGen/PowerPC/func-addr.ll is modified to test the new
code generation. I've added a -O0 run line to test the fast-isel code as
well.
Tested on powerpc64[le]-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions.
llvm-svn: 211056
the initializeSubtargetDependencies code to obtain an initialized
subtarget and migrate a couple of subtarget using functions to the
.cpp file to avoid circular includes.
llvm-svn: 210822
Various masks on shufflevector instructions are recognizable as
specific PowerPC instructions (vector pack, vector merge, etc.).
There is existing code in PPCISelLowering.cpp to recognize the correct
patterns for big endian code. The masks for these instructions are
different for little endian code due to the big-endian numbering
employed by these instructions. This patch adds the recognition code
for little endian.
I've added a new test case test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vec_shuffle_le.ll for
this. The existing recognizer test (vec_shuffle.ll) is unnecessarily
verbose and difficult to read, so I felt it was better to add a new
test rather than modify the old one.
llvm-svn: 210536
The code in PPCTargetLowering::PerformDAGCombine() that handles
unaligned Altivec vector loads generates a lvsl followed by a vperm.
As we've seen in numerous other places, the vperm instruction has a
big-endian bias, and this is fixed for little endian by complementing
the permute control vector and swapping the input operands. In this
case the lvsl is providing the permute control vector. Rather than
generating an lvsl and a complement operation, it is sufficient to
generate an lvsr instruction instead. Thus for LE code generation we
will generate an lvsr rather than an lvsl, and swap the other input
arguments on the vperm.
The existing test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vec_misalign.ll is updated to test
the code generation for PPC64 and PPC64LE, in addition to the existing
PPC32/G5 testing.
llvm-svn: 210493
The existing code in PPCTargetLowering::LowerMUL() for multiplying two
v16i8 values assumes that vector elements are numbered in big-endian
order. For little-endian targets, the vector element numbering is
reversed, but the vmuleub, vmuloub, and vperm instructions still
assume big-endian numbering. To account for this, we must adjust the
permute control vector and reverse the order of the input registers on
the vperm instruction.
The existing test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vec_mul.ll is updated to be executed
on powerpc64 and powerpc64le targets as well as the original powerpc
(32-bit) target.
llvm-svn: 210474
I saw at least a memory leak or two from inspection (on probably
untested error paths) and r206991, which was the original inspiration
for this change.
I ran this idea by Jim Grosbach a few weeks ago & he was OK with it.
Since it's a basically mechanical patch that seemed sufficient - usual
post-commit review, revert, etc, as needed.
llvm-svn: 210427
This patch fixes a couple of lowering issues for little endian
PowerPC. The code for lowering BUILD_VECTOR contains a number of
optimizations that are only valid for big endian. For now, we disable
those optimizations for correctness. In the future, we will add
analogous optimizations that are correct for little endian.
When lowering a SHUFFLE_VECTOR to a VPERM operation, we again need to
make the now-familiar transformation of swapping the input operands
and complementing the permute control vector. Correctness of this
transformation is tested by the accompanying test case.
llvm-svn: 210336
This is a preliminary patch for the PowerPC64LE support. In stage 1
of the vector support, we will support the VMX (Altivec) instruction
set, but will not yet support the VSX instructions. This is merely a
staging issue to provide functional vector support as soon as
possible.
llvm-svn: 210271
This seems to match what gcc does for ppc and what every other llvm
backend does.
This is a fixed version of r209638. The difference is to avoid any change
in behavior for functions. The logic for using constant pools for function
addresseses is spread over a few places and we have to keep them in sync.
llvm-svn: 209821
This matches gcc's behavior. It also seems natural given that aliases
contain other properties that govern how it is accessed (linkage,
visibility, dll storage).
Clang still has to be updated to expose this feature to C.
llvm-svn: 209759
This reverts commit r209638 because it broke self-hosting on ppc64/Linux. (the
Clang-compiled TableGen would segfault because it jumped to an invalid address
from within _ZNK4llvm17ManagedStaticBase21RegisterManagedStaticEPFPvvEPFvS1_E
(which is within the command-line parameter registration process)).
llvm-svn: 209745
In PPCISelLowering.cpp: PPCTargetLowering::LowerBUILD_VECTOR(), there
is an optimization for certain patterns to generate one or two vector
splats followed by a vector add or subtract. This operation is
represented by a VADD_SPLAT in the selection DAG. Prior to this
patch, it was possible for the VADD_SPLAT to be assigned the wrong
data type, causing incorrect code generation. This patch corrects the
problem.
Specifically, the code previously assigned the value type of the
BUILD_VECTOR node to the newly generated VADD_SPLAT node. This is
correct much of the time, but not always. The problem is that the
call to isConstantSplat() may return a SplatBitSize that is not the
same as the number of bits in the original element vector type. The
correct type to assign is a vector type with the same element bit size
as SplatBitSize.
The included test case shows an example of this, where the
BUILD_VECTOR node has a type of v16i8. The vector to be built is {0,
16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16}. isConstantSplat
detects that we can generate a splat of 16 for type v8i16, which is
the type we must assign to the VADD_SPLAT node. If we do not, we
generate a vspltisb of 8 and a vaddubm, which generates the incorrect
result {16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16,
16}. The correct code generation is a vspltish of 8 and a vadduhm.
This patch also corrected code generation for
CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-10-SplatMiscompile.ll, which had been marked
as an XFAIL, so we can remove the XFAIL from the test case.
llvm-svn: 209662
The SplitIndexingFromLoad changes exposed a latent isel bug in the PowerPC64
backend. We matched an immediate offset with STWX8 even though it only
supports register offset.
The culprit is the complex-pattern predicate, SelectAddrIdx, which decides
that if the offset is not ISD::Constant it must be a register.
Many thanks to Bill Schmidt for testing this.
llvm-svn: 209219
- On ARM/ARM64 we get a vrev because the shuffle matching code is really smart. We still unroll anything that's not v4i32 though.
- On X86 we get a pshufb with SSSE3. Required more cleverness in isShuffleMaskLegal.
- On PPC we get a vperm for v8i16 and v4i32. v2i64 is unrolled.
llvm-svn: 209123
This is mostly a mechanical change changing all the call sites to the newer
chained-function construction pattern. This removes the horrible 15-parameter
constructor for the CallLoweringInfo in favour of setting properties of the call
via chained functions. No functional change beyond the removal of the old
constructors are intended.
llvm-svn: 209082
member variable and sink the initialization of crbits into the
subtarget feature reset code.
No functional change, but this refactor will be used in a future
commit.
llvm-svn: 208726
Support for the intrinsics that read from and write to global named registers
is added for r1, r2 and r13 (depending on the subtarget).
llvm-svn: 208509
The counter-loops formation pass needs to know what operations might be
function calls (because they can't appear in counter-based loops). On PPC32,
128-bit shifts might be runtime calls (even though you can't use __int128 on
PPC32, it seems that SROA might form them).
Fixes PR19709.
llvm-svn: 208501
The fix itself is fairly simple: move getAccessVariant to MCValue so that we
replace the old weak expression evaluation with the far more general
EvaluateAsRelocatable.
This then requires that EvaluateAsRelocatable stop when it finds a non
trivial reference kind. And that in turn requires the ELF writer to look
harder for weak references.
Last but not least, this found a case where we were being bug by bug
compatible with gas and accepting an invalid input. I reported pr19647
to track it.
llvm-svn: 207920
This is similar to the 'tail' marker, except that it guarantees that
tail call optimization will occur. It also comes with convervative IR
verification rules that ensure that tail call optimization is possible.
Reviewers: nicholas
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3240
llvm-svn: 207143
I discovered this const-hole while attempting to coalesnce the Symbol
and SymbolMap data structures. There's some pending issues with that,
but I figured this change was easy to flush early.
llvm-svn: 207124
For now it contains a single flag, SanitizeAddress, which enables
AddressSanitizer instrumentation of inline assembly.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 206971
system headers above the includes of generated '.inc' files that
actually contain code. In a few targets this was already done pretty
consistently, but it wasn't done *really* consistently anywhere. It is
strictly cleaner IMO and necessary in a bunch of places where the
DEBUG_TYPE is referenced from the generated code. Consistency with the
necessary places trumps. Hopefully the build bots are OK with the
movement of intrin.h...
llvm-svn: 206838
behavior based on other files defining DEBUG_TYPE, which means it cannot
define DEBUG_TYPE at all. This is actually better IMO as it forces folks
to define relevant DEBUG_TYPEs for their files. However, it requires all
files that currently use DEBUG(...) to define a DEBUG_TYPE if they don't
already. I've updated all such files in LLVM and will do the same for
other upstream projects.
This still leaves one important change in how LLVM uses the DEBUG_TYPE
macro going forward: we need to only define the macro *after* header
files have been #include-ed. Previously, this wasn't possible because
Debug.h required the macro to be pre-defined. This commit removes that.
By defining DEBUG_TYPE after the includes two things are fixed:
- Header files that need to provide a DEBUG_TYPE for some inline code
can do so by defining the macro before their inline code and undef-ing
it afterward so the macro does not escape.
- We no longer have rampant ODR violations due to including headers with
different DEBUG_TYPE definitions. This may be mostly an academic
violation today, but with modules these types of violations are easy
to check for and potentially very relevant.
Where necessary to suppor headers with DEBUG_TYPE, I have moved the
definitions below the includes in this commit. I plan to move the rest
of the DEBUG_TYPE macros in LLVM in subsequent commits; this one is big
enough.
The comments in Debug.h, which were hilariously out of date already,
have been updated to reflect the recommended practice going forward.
llvm-svn: 206822
This patch re-introduces the MCContext member that was removed from
MCDisassembler in r206063, and requires that an MCContext be passed in at
MCDisassembler construction time. (Previously the MCContext member had been
initialized in an ad-hoc fashion after construction). The MCCContext member
can be used by MCDisassembler sub-classes to construct constant or
target-specific MCExprs.
This patch updates disassemblers for in-tree targets, and provides the
MCRegisterInfo instance that some disassemblers were using through the
MCContext (previously those backends were constructing their own
MCRegisterInfo instances).
llvm-svn: 206241
Implements the various TTI functions to enable constant hoisting on PPC. The
only significant test-suite change is this:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm - 20% speedup
(which essentially reverses the slowdown from r206120).
llvm-svn: 206141
We had been using the known-zero values of the operand of the or to construct
the mask for an rlwimi; this is not quite correct, but fine when the mask is
constant. When the mask is constant, then the known zeros of the operand must
be a superset of the zeros in the mask. However, when the mask is not a
constant, then there might be bits in the operand that are not known to be zero
that, at runtime, might be zero in the mask. Therefore, we check that any bits
not known to be zero *are* known to be one in the mask. Otherwise, we can't
fold the mask with the or and shift.
This was revealed as a miscompile of
MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 when I started experimenting with
constant hoisting.
llvm-svn: 206136
PPC::isVSLDOIShuffleMask should return -1, not false, when the shuffle
predicate should be false.
Noticed by inspection; no test case (yet).
llvm-svn: 205787
This provides more realistic costs for the insert/extractelement instructions
(which are load/store pairs), accounts for the cheap unaligned Altivec load
sequence, and for unaligned VSX load/stores.
Bad news:
MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa - 35% slowdown (this will require more investigation)
SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/queens - 20% slowdown (we no longer vectorize this, but it was a constant store that was scalarized)
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pcompress2/pcompress2 - 2% slowdown
Good news:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ary3 - 54% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary - 40% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks - 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural - 30% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt - 20% speedup
Unfortunately, estimating the costs of the stack-based scalarization sequences
is hard, and adjusting these costs is like a game of whac-a-mole :( I'll
revisit this again after we have better codegen for vector extloads and
truncstores and unaligned load/stores.
llvm-svn: 205658
gcc inline asm supports specifying "cc" as a clobber of all condition
registers. Add just enough modeling of the full register to make this work.
Fixed PR19326.
llvm-svn: 205630
PPCTTI::getMemoryOpCost will now make use of BasicTTI::getMemoryOpCost to
calculate the base cost of the memory access, and then adjust on top of that.
There is no functionality change from this modification, but it will become
important so that PPCTTI can take advantage of scalarization information for which
BasicTTI::getMemoryOpCost will account in the near future.
llvm-svn: 205476
Just pass a MachineInstr reference rather than an MBB iterator.
Creating a MachineInstr& is the first thing every implementation did
anyway.
llvm-svn: 205453
If we have two unique values for a v2i64 build vector, this will always result
in two vector loads if we expand using shuffles. Only one is necessary.
llvm-svn: 205231
sitofp from v2i32 to v2f64 ends up generating a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG v2i64 node
(and similarly for v2i16 and v2i8). Even though there are no sign-extension (or
algebraic shifts) for v2i64 types, we can handle v2i32 sign extensions by
converting two and from v2i64. The small trick necessary here is to shift the
i32 elements into the right lanes before the i32 -> f64 step. This is because
of the big Endian nature of the system, we need the i32 portion in the high
word of the i64 elements.
For v2i16 and v2i8 we can do the same, but we first use the default Altivec
shift-based expansion from v2i16 or v2i8 to v2i32 (by casting to v4i32) and
then apply the above procedure.
llvm-svn: 205146
v2i64 is a legal type under VSX, however we don't have native vector
comparisons. We can handle eq/ne by casting it to an Altivec type, but
everything else must be expanded.
llvm-svn: 205106
The vector divide and sqrt instructions have high latencies, and the scalar
comparisons are like all of the others. On the P7, permutations take an extra
cycle over purely-simple vector ops.
llvm-svn: 205096
I started trying to fix a small issue, but this code has seen a small fix too
many.
The old code was fairly convoluted. Some of the issues it had:
* It failed to check if a symbol difference was in the some section when
converting a relocation to pcrel.
* It failed to check if the relocation was already pcrel.
* The pcrel value computation was wrong in some cases (relocation-pc.s)
* It was missing quiet a few cases where it should not convert symbol
relocations to section relocations, leaving the backends to patch it up.
* It would not propagate the fact that it had changed a relocation to pcrel,
requiring a quiet nasty work around in ARM.
* It was missing comments.
llvm-svn: 205076
We had stored both f64 values and v2f64, etc. values in the VSX registers. This
worked, but was suboptimal because we would always spill 16-byte values even
through we almost always had scalar 8-byte values. This resulted in an
increase in stack-size use, extra memory bandwidth, etc. To fix this, I've
added 64-bit subregisters of the Altivec registers, and combined those with the
existing scalar floating-point registers to form a class of VSX scalar
floating-point registers. The ABI code has also been enhanced to use this
register class and some other necessary improvements have been made.
llvm-svn: 205075
v2[fi]64 values need to be explicitly passed in VSX registers. This is because
the code in TRI that finds the minimal register class given a register and a
value type will assert if given an Altivec register and a non-Altivec type.
llvm-svn: 205041
As explained in r204976, because of how the allocation of VSX registers
interacts with the call-lowering code, we sometimes end up generating self VSX
copies. Specifically, things like this:
%VSL2<def> = COPY %F2, %VSL2<imp-use,kill>
(where %F2 is really a sub-register of %VSL2, and so this copy is a nop)
This adds a small cleanup pass to remove these prior to post-RA scheduling.
llvm-svn: 204980
Because of how the allocation of VSX registers interacts with the call-lowering
code, we sometimes end up generating self VSX copies. Specifically, things like
this:
%VSL2<def> = COPY %F2, %VSL2<imp-use,kill>
(where %F2 is really a sub-register of %VSL2, and so this copy is a nop)
The problem is that ExpandPostRAPseudos always assumes that *some* instruction
has been inserted, and adds implicit defs to it. This is a problem if no copy
was inserted because it can cause subtle problems during post-RA scheduling.
These self copies will have to be removed some other way.
llvm-svn: 204976
First, v2f64 vector extract had not been declared legal (and so the existing
patterns were not being used). Second, the patterns for that, and for
scalar_to_vector, should really be a regclass copy, not a subregister
operation, because the VSX registers directly hold both the vector and scalar data.
llvm-svn: 204971
These operations need to be expanded during legalization so that isel does not
crash. In theory, we might be able to custom lower some of these. That,
however, would need to be follow-up work.
llvm-svn: 204963
This adds back r204781.
Original message:
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204934
These patterns are dead (because v4f32 stores are currently promoted to v4i32
and stored using Altivec instructions), and also are likely not correct
(because they'd store the vector elements in the opposite order from that
assumed by the rest of the Altivec code).
llvm-svn: 204839
These instructions have access to the complete VSX register file. In addition,
they "swap" the order of the elements so that element 0 (the scalar part) comes
first in memory and element 1 follows at a higher address.
llvm-svn: 204838
v2i64 needs to be a legal VSX type because it is the SetCC result type from
v2f64 comparisons. We need to expand all non-arithmetic v2i64 operations.
This fixes the lowering for v2f64 VSELECT.
llvm-svn: 204828
With VSX there is a real vector select instruction, and so we should use it.
Note that VSELECT will still scalarize for v2f64 because the corresponding
SetCC result type (v2i64) is not currently a legal type.
llvm-svn: 204801
This reverts commit r204781.
I will follow up to with msan folks to see what is what they
were trying to do with aliases to weak aliases.
llvm-svn: 204784
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204781
The VSX instruction set has two types of FMA instructions: A-type (where the
addend is taken from the output register) and M-type (where one of the product
operands is taken from the output register). This adds a small pass that runs
just after MI scheduling (and, thus, just before register allocation) that
mutates A-type instructions (that are created during isel) into M-type
instructions when:
1. This will eliminate an otherwise-necessary copy of the addend
2. One of the product operands is killed by the instruction
The "right" moment to make this decision is in between scheduling and register
allocation, because only there do we know whether or not one of the product
operands is killed by any particular instruction. Unfortunately, this also
makes the implementation somewhat complicated, because the MIs are not in SSA
form and we need to preserve the LiveIntervals analysis.
As a simple example, if we have:
%vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9
%vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16,
%RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16
...
%vreg9<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg9<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg19,
%RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg9,%vreg17,%vreg19
...
We can eliminate the copy by changing from the A-type to the
M-type instruction. This means:
%vreg5<def,tied1> = XSMADDADP %vreg5<tied0>, %vreg17, %vreg16,
%RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg17,%vreg16
is replaced by:
%vreg16<def,tied1> = XSMADDMDP %vreg16<tied0>, %vreg18, %vreg9,
%RM<imp-use>; VSLRC:%vreg16,%vreg18,%vreg9
and we remove: %vreg5<def> = COPY %vreg9; VSLRC:%vreg5,%vreg9
llvm-svn: 204768
Although the first two operands are the ones that can be swapped, the tied
input operand is listed before them, so we need to adjust for that.
I have a test case for this, but it goes along with an upcoming commit (so it
will come soon).
llvm-svn: 204748
TableGen will create a lookup table for the A-type FMA instructions providing
their corresponding M-form opcodes. This will be used by upcoming commits.
llvm-svn: 204746
As a first step towards real little-endian code generation, this patch
changes the PowerPC MC layer to actually generate little-endian object
files. This involves passing the little-endian flag through the various
layers, including down to createELFObjectWriter so we actually get basic
little-endian ELF objects, emitting instructions in little-endian order,
and handling fixups and relocations as appropriate for little-endian.
The bulk of the patch is to update most test cases in test/MC/PowerPC
to verify both big- and little-endian encodings. (The only test cases
*not* updated are those that create actual big-endian ABI code, like
the TLS tests.)
Note that while the object files are now little-endian, the generated
code itself is not yet updated, in particular, it still does not adhere
to the ELFv2 ABI.
llvm-svn: 204634
[PPC64LE] ELFv2 ABI updates for the .opd section
The PPC64 Little Endian (PPC64LE) target supports the ELFv2 ABI, and as
such, does not have a ".opd" section. This is keyed off a _CALL_ELF=2
macro check.
The CALL_ELF check is not clearly documented at this time. The basis
for usage in this patch is from the gcc thread here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01144.html
> Adding comment from Uli:
Looks good to me. I think the old-style JIT doesn't really work
anyway for 64-bit, but at least with this patch LLVM will compile
and link again on a ppc64le host ...
llvm-svn: 204614
I'm under the impression that we used to infer the isCommutable flag from the
instruction-associated pattern. Regardless, we don't seem to do this (at least
by default) any more. I've gone through all of our instruction definitions, and
marked as commutative all of those that should be trivial to commute (by
exchanging the first two operands). There has been special code for the RL*
instructions, and that's not changed.
Before this change, we had the following commutative instructions:
RLDIMI
RLDIMIo
RLWIMI
RLWIMI8
RLWIMI8o
RLWIMIo
XSADDDP
XSMULDP
XVADDDP
XVADDSP
XVMULDP
XVMULSP
After:
ADD4
ADD4o
ADD8
ADD8o
ADDC
ADDC8
ADDC8o
ADDCo
ADDE
ADDE8
ADDE8o
ADDEo
AND
AND8
AND8o
ANDo
CRAND
CREQV
CRNAND
CRNOR
CROR
CRXOR
EQV
EQV8
EQV8o
EQVo
FADD
FADDS
FADDSo
FADDo
FMADD
FMADDS
FMADDSo
FMADDo
FMSUB
FMSUBS
FMSUBSo
FMSUBo
FMUL
FMULS
FMULSo
FMULo
FNMADD
FNMADDS
FNMADDSo
FNMADDo
FNMSUB
FNMSUBS
FNMSUBSo
FNMSUBo
MULHD
MULHDU
MULHDUo
MULHDo
MULHW
MULHWU
MULHWUo
MULHWo
MULLD
MULLDo
MULLW
MULLWo
NAND
NAND8
NAND8o
NANDo
NOR
NOR8
NOR8o
NORo
OR
OR8
OR8o
ORo
RLDIMI
RLDIMIo
RLWIMI
RLWIMI8
RLWIMI8o
RLWIMIo
VADDCUW
VADDFP
VADDSBS
VADDSHS
VADDSWS
VADDUBM
VADDUBS
VADDUHM
VADDUHS
VADDUWM
VADDUWS
VAND
VAVGSB
VAVGSH
VAVGSW
VAVGUB
VAVGUH
VAVGUW
VMADDFP
VMAXFP
VMAXSB
VMAXSH
VMAXSW
VMAXUB
VMAXUH
VMAXUW
VMHADDSHS
VMHRADDSHS
VMINFP
VMINSB
VMINSH
VMINSW
VMINUB
VMINUH
VMINUW
VMLADDUHM
VMULESB
VMULESH
VMULEUB
VMULEUH
VMULOSB
VMULOSH
VMULOUB
VMULOUH
VNMSUBFP
VOR
VXOR
XOR
XOR8
XOR8o
XORo
XSADDDP
XSMADDADP
XSMAXDP
XSMINDP
XSMSUBADP
XSMULDP
XSNMADDADP
XSNMSUBADP
XVADDDP
XVADDSP
XVMADDADP
XVMADDASP
XVMAXDP
XVMAXSP
XVMINDP
XVMINSP
XVMSUBADP
XVMSUBASP
XVMULDP
XVMULSP
XVNMADDADP
XVNMADDASP
XVNMSUBADP
XVNMSUBASP
XXLAND
XXLNOR
XXLOR
XXLXOR
This is a by-inspection change, and I'm not sure how to write a reliable test
case. I would like advice on this, however.
llvm-svn: 204609
I've done some experimentation with this, and it looks like using the
lower-latency (but lower throughput) copy instruction is essentially always the
right thing to do.
My assumption is that, in order to be relatively sure that the higher-latency
copy will increase throughput, we'd want to have it unlikely to be in-flight
with its use. On the P7, the global completion table (GCT) can hold a maximum
of 120 instructions, shared among all active threads (up to 4), giving 30
instructions per thread. So specifically, I'd require at least that many
instructions between the copy and the use before the high-latency variant is
used.
Trying this, however, over the entire test suite resulted in zero cases where
the high-latency form would be preferable. This may be a consequence of the
fact that the scheduler views copies as free, and so they tend to end up close
to their uses. For this experiment I created a function:
unsigned chooseVSXCopy(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
MachineBasicBlock::iterator I,
unsigned DestReg, unsigned SrcReg,
unsigned StartDist = 1,
unsigned Depth = 3) const;
with an implementation like:
if (!Depth)
return PPC::XXLOR;
const unsigned MaxDist = 30;
unsigned Dist = StartDist;
for (auto J = I, JE = MBB.end(); J != JE && Dist <= MaxDist; ++J) {
if (J->isTransient() && !J->isCopy())
continue;
if (J->isCall() || J->isReturn() || J->readsRegister(DestReg, TRI))
return PPC::XXLOR;
++Dist;
}
// We've exceeded the required distance for the high-latency form, use it.
if (Dist > MaxDist)
return PPC::XVCPSGNDP;
// If this is only an exit block, use the low-latency form.
if (MBB.succ_empty())
return PPC::XXLOR;
// We've reached the end of the block, check the successor blocks (up to some
// depth), and use the high-latency form if that is okay with all successors.
for (auto J = MBB.succ_begin(), JE = MBB.succ_end(); J != JE; ++J) {
if (chooseVSXCopy(**J, (*J)->begin(), DestReg, SrcReg,
Dist, --Depth) == PPC::XXLOR)
return PPC::XXLOR;
}
// All of our successor blocks seem okay with the high-latency variant, so
// we'll use it.
return PPC::XVCPSGNDP;
and then changed the copy opcode selection from:
Opc = PPC::XXLOR;
to:
Opc = chooseVSXCopy(MBB, std::next(I), DestReg, SrcReg);
In conclusion, I'm removing the FIXME from the comment, because I believe that
there is, at least absent other examples, nothing to fix.
llvm-svn: 204591
When VSX is available, these instructions should be used in preference to the
older variants that only have access to the scalar floating-point registers.
llvm-svn: 204559
Given
bar = foo + 4
.long bar
MC would eat the 4. GNU as includes it in the relocation. The rule seems to be
that a variable that defines a symbol is used in the relocation and one that
does not define a symbol is evaluated and the result included in the relocation.
Fixing this unfortunately required some other changes:
* Since the variable is now evaluated, it would prevent the ELF writer from
noticing the weakref marker the elf streamer uses. This patch then replaces
that with a VariantKind in MCSymbolRefExpr.
* Using VariantKind then requires us to look past other VariantKind to see
.weakref bar,foo
call bar@PLT
doing this also fixes
zed = foo +2
call zed@PLT
so that is a good thing.
* Looking past VariantKind means that the relocation selection has to use
the fixup instead of the target.
This is a reboot of the previous fixes for MC. I will watch the sanitizer
buildbot and wait for a build before adding back the previous fixes.
llvm-svn: 204294
When converting a signed 32-bit integer to double-precision floating point on
hardware without a lfiwax instruction, we have to instead use a lfd followed
by fcfid. We were erroneously offsetting the address by 4 bytes in
preparation for either a lfiwax or lfiwzx when generating the lfd. This fixes
that silly error.
This was not caught in the test suite since the conversion tests were run with
-mcpu=pwr7, which implies availability of lfiwax. I've added another test
case for older hardware that checks the code we expect in the absence of
lfiwax and other flavors of fcfid. There are fewer tests in this test case
because we punt to DAG selection in more cases on older hardware. (We must
generate complex fiddly sequences in those cases, and there is marginal
benefit in duplicating that logic in fast-isel.)
llvm-svn: 204155
Commit r181723 introduced code to avoid placing initialized variables
needing relocations into the .rodata section, which avoid copy relocs
that do not work as expected on ppc64 function references.
The same treatment is also needed for *named* .rodata.XXX sections.
This patch changes PPC64LinuxTargetObjectFile::SelectSectionForGlobal
to modify "Kind" *before* calling the default SelectSectionForGlobal
routine, instead of first calling the default routine and then just
checking for the (main) .rodata section afterwards.
llvm-svn: 203921
operator* on the by-operand iterators to return a MachineOperand& rather than
a MachineInstr&. At this point they almost behave like normal iterators!
Again, this requires making some existing loops more verbose, but should pave
the way for the big range-based for-loop cleanups in the future.
llvm-svn: 203865
VSX is an ISA extension supported on the POWER7 and later cores that enhances
floating-point vector and scalar capabilities. Among other things, this adds
<2 x double> support and generally helps to reduce register pressure.
The interesting part of this ISA feature is the register configuration: there
are 64 new 128-bit vector registers, the 32 of which are super-registers of the
existing 32 scalar floating-point registers, and the second 32 of which overlap
with the 32 Altivec vector registers. This makes things like vector insertion
and extraction tricky: this can be free but only if we force a restriction to
the right register subclass when needed. A new "minipass" PPCVSXCopy takes care
of this (although it could do a more-optimal job of it; see the comment about
unnecessary copies below).
Please note that, currently, VSX is not enabled by default when targeting
anything because it is not yet ready for that. The assembler and disassembler
are fully implemented and tested. However:
- CodeGen support causes miscompiles; test-suite runtime failures:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/distray/distray
MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/08-main/main
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/voronoi/voronoi
MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign
MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/matmul_f64_4x4
- The lowering currently falls back to using Altivec instructions far more
than it should. Worse, there are some things that are scalarized through the
stack that shouldn't be.
- A lot of unnecessary copies make it past the optimizers, and this needs to
be fixed.
- Many more regression tests are needed.
Normally, I'd fix these things prior to committing, but there are some
students and other contributors who would like to work this, and so it makes
sense to move this development process upstream where it can be subject to the
regular code-review procedures.
llvm-svn: 203768
There are currently two schemes for mapping instruction operands to
instruction-format variables for generating the instruction encoders and
decoders for the assembler and disassembler respectively: a) to map by name and
b) to map by position.
In the long run, we'd like to remove the position-based scheme and use only
name-based mapping. Unfortunately, the name-based scheme currently cannot deal
with complex operands (those with suboperands), and so we currently must use
the position-based scheme for those. On the other hand, the position-based
scheme cannot deal with (register) variables that are split into multiple
ranges. An upcoming commit to the PowerPC backend (adding VSX support) will
require this capability. While we could teach the position-based scheme to
handle that, since we'd like to move away from the position-based mapping
generally, it seems silly to teach it new tricks now. What makes more sense is
to allow for partial transitioning: use the name-based mapping when possible,
and only use the position-based scheme when necessary.
Now the problem is that mixing the two sensibly was not possible: the
position-based mapping would map based on position, but would not skip those
variables that were mapped by name. Instead, the two sets of assignments would
overlap. However, I cannot currently change the current behavior, because there
are some backends that rely on it [I think mistakenly, but I'll send a message
to llvmdev about that]. So I've added a new TableGen bit variable:
noNamedPositionallyEncodedOperands, that can be used to cause the
position-based mapping to skip variables mapped by name.
llvm-svn: 203767
the stack of the analysis group because they are all immutable passes.
This is made clear by Craig's recent work to use override
systematically -- we weren't overriding anything for 'finalizePass'
because there is no such thing.
This is kind of a lame restriction on the API -- we can no longer push
and pop things, we just set up the stack and run. However, I'm not
invested in building some better solution on top of the existing
(terrifying) immutable pass and legacy pass manager.
llvm-svn: 203437
Ulrich Weigand