Because CodeGen can't depend on GlobalISel, we need a way to encapsulate the CSE
configs that can be passed between TargetPassConfig and the targets' custom
pass configs. This CSEConfigBase allows targets to create custom CSE configs
which is then used by the GISel passes for the CSEMIRBuilder.
This support will be used in a follow up commit to allow constant-only CSE for
-O0 compiles in D60580.
llvm-svn: 358368
This enables the simple copy combine that already exists in the CombinerHelper.
However, it exposed a bug in the GISelChangeObserver where it wouldn't clear a
set of MIs to process, and so would end up causing a crash when deleted MIs were
being added to the combiner worklist again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60579
llvm-svn: 358318
This crash was introduced in r358032 as we try to construct an EVT from an MVT
in order to find the register type for the calling conv. Fall back instead of
trying to do this with an invalid MVT coming from i256.
llvm-svn: 358314
// shuffle (concat X, undef), (concat Y, undef), Mask -->
// concat (shuffle X, Y, Mask0), (shuffle X, Y, Mask1)
The ARM changes with 'vtrn' and narrowed 'vuzp' are improvements.
The x86 changes look neutral or better. There's one test with an
extra instruction, but that could be reversed for a subtarget with
the right attributes. But by default, we want to avoid the 256-bit
op when possible (in my motivating benchmark, a handful of ymm ops
sprinkled into a sequence of xmm ops are triggering frequency
throttling on Haswell resulting in significantly worse perf).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60545
llvm-svn: 358291
It causes clang to crash while building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/952230
for reproducer.
> The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
> prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
> expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
> address instead of the value behind it.
>
> The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
> big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
> larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
> address).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358281
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358268
If the upper bits of the SHL result aren't used, we might be able to use a narrower shift. For example, on X86 this can turn a 64-bit into 32-bit enabling a smaller encoding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60358
llvm-svn: 358257
This removes 500 transitive dependencies for a modification of
MCDwarf.h in a build of llc for a single out of line function
and reduces the build overhead by more than half without impacting
test time of check-llvm.
llvm-svn: 358255
The isLoopCarriedDep function does not correctly compute loop
carried dependences when the array index offset is negative
or the stride is smallar than the access size.
Patch by Denis Antrushin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60135
llvm-svn: 358233
// bo (build_vec ...undef, x, undef...), (build_vec ...undef, y, undef...) -->
// build_vec ...undef, (bo x, y), undef...
The lifetime of the nodes in these examples is different for variables versus constants,
but they are all build vectors briefly, so I'm proposing to catch them in this form to
handle all of the leading examples in the motivating test file.
Before we have build vectors, we might have insert_vector_element. After that, we might
have scalar_to_vector and constant pool loads.
It's going to take more work to ensure that FP vector operands are getting simplified
with undef elements, so this transform can apply more widely. In a non-loose FP environment,
we are likely simplifying FP elements to NaN values rather than undefs.
We also need to allow more opcodes down this path. Eg, we don't handle FP min/max flavors
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60514
llvm-svn: 358172
Because of gp = sdata_start_address + 0x800, gp with signed twelve-bit offset
could covert most of the small data section. Linker relaxation could transfer
the multiple data accessing instructions to a gp base with signed twelve-bit
offset instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57493
llvm-svn: 358150
Certain optimisations from ConstantHoisting and CGP rely on Selection DAG not
seeing through to the constant in other blocks. Revert this patch while we come
up with a better way to handle that.
I will try to follow this up with some better tests.
llvm-svn: 358113
Call lowering should use this directly instead of going through the
EVT version, but more work is needed to deal with this (mostly the
passing of the IR type pointer instead of the relevant properties in
ArgInfo).
llvm-svn: 358111
Summary:
The InlineAsm::AsmDialect is only required for X86; no architecture
makes use of it and as such it gets passed around between arch-specific
and general code while being unused for all architectures but X86.
Since the AsmDialect is queried from a MachineInstr, which we also pass
around, remove the additional AsmDialect parameter and query for it deep
in the X86AsmPrinter only when needed/as late as possible.
This refactor should help later planned refactors to AsmPrinter, as this
difference in the X86AsmPrinter makes it harder to make AsmPrinter more
generic.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, llvm-commits, peter.smith, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60488
llvm-svn: 358101
Summary:
When calculating the debug value history, DbgEntityHistoryCalculator
would only keep track of register clobbering for the latest debug value
per inlined entity. This meant that preceding register-described debug
value fragments would live on until the next overlapping debug value,
ignoring any potential clobbering. This patch amends
DbgEntityHistoryCalculator so that it keeps track of all registers that
a inlined entity's currently live debug values are described by.
The DebugInfo/COFF/pieces.ll test case has had to be changed since
previously a register-described fragment would incorrectly outlive its
basic block.
The parent patch D59941 is expected to increase the coverage slightly,
as it makes sure that location list entries are inserted after clobbered
fragments, and this patch is expected to decrease it, as it stops
preceding register-described from living longer than they should. All in
all, this patch and the preceding patch has a negligible effect on the
output from `llvm-dwarfdump -statistics' for a clang-3.4 binary built
using the RelWithDebInfo build profile. "Scope bytes covered" increases
by 0.5%, and "variables with location" increases from 2212083 to
2212088, but it should improve the accuracy quite a bit.
This fixes PR40283.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie, rnk, bjope
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59942
llvm-svn: 358073
Summary:
Currently the DbgValueHistorymap only keeps track of clobbered registers
for the last debug value that it has encountered. This could lead to
preceding register-described debug values living on longer in the
location lists than they should. See PR40283 for an example. This
patch does not introduce tracking of multiple registers, but changes
the DbgValueHistoryMap structure to allow for that in a follow-up
patch. This patch is not NFC, as it at least fixes two bugs in
DwarfDebug (both are covered in the new clobbered-fragments.mir test):
* If a debug value was clobbered (its End pointer set), the value would
still be added to OpenRanges, meaning that the succeeding location list
entries could potentially contain stale values.
* If a debug value was clobbered, and there were non-overlapping
fragments that were still live after the clobbering, DwarfDebug would
not create a location list entry starting directly after the
clobbering instruction. This meant that the location list could have
a gap until the next debug value for the variable was encountered.
Before this patch, the history map was represented by <Begin, End>
pairs, where a new pair was created for each new debug value. When
dealing with partially overlapping register-described debug values, such
as in the following example:
DBG_VALUE $reg2, $noreg, !1, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 32)
[...]
DBG_VALUE $reg3, $noreg, !1, !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 64, 32)
[...]
$reg2 = insn1
[...]
$reg3 = insn2
the history map would then contain the entries `[<DV1, insn1>, [<DV2, insn2>]`.
This would leave it up to the users of the map to be aware of
the relative order of the instructions, which e.g. could make
DwarfDebug::buildLocationList() needlessly complex. Instead, this patch
makes the history map structure monotonically increasing by dropping the
End pointer, and replacing that with explicit clobbering entries in the
vector. Each debug value has an "end index", which if set, points to the
entry in the vector that ends the debug value. The ending entry can
either be an overlapping debug value, or an instruction which clobbers
the register that the debug value is described by. The ending entry's
instruction can thus either be excluded or included in the debug value's
range. If the end index is not set, the debug value that the entry
introduces is valid until the end of the function.
Changes to test cases:
* DebugInfo/X86/pieces-3.ll: The range of the first DBG_VALUE, which
describes that the fragment (0, 64) is located in RDI, was
incorrectly ended by the clobbering of RAX, which the second
(non-overlapping) DBG_VALUE was described by. With this patch we
get a second entry that only describes RDI after that clobbering.
* DebugInfo/ARM/partial-subreg.ll: This test seems to indiciate a bug
in LiveDebugValues that is caused by it not being aware of fragments.
I have added some comments in the test case about that. Also, before
this patch DwarfDebug would incorrectly include a register-described
debug value from a preceding block in a location list entry.
Reviewers: aprantl, probinson, dblaikie, rnk, bjope
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59941
llvm-svn: 358072
Summary:
In an upcoming commit the history map will be changed so that it
contains explicit entries for instructions that clobber preceding debug
values, rather than Begin- End range pairs, so generalize the name to
"Entry".
Also, prefix the iterator variable names in buildLocationList() with
"E". In an upcoming commit the entry will have query functions such as
"isD(e)b(u)gValue", which could at a glance make one confuse it for
iterations over MachineInstrs, so make the iterator names a bit more
distinct to avoid that.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59939
llvm-svn: 358060
Summary:
Replace use of std::pair by creating a class for the debug value
instruction ranges instead. This is a preparatory refactoring for
improving handling of clobbered fragments.
In an upcoming commit the Begin pointer will become a PointerIntPair, so
it will be cleaner to have a getter for that.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59938
llvm-svn: 358059
This is helpful to measure the impact of D60125 on maintaining
topological orders.
Reviewers: MatzeB, atrick, efriedma, niravd
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60187
llvm-svn: 358058
required to be passed as different register types. E.g. <2 x i16> may need to
be passed as a larger <2 x i32> type, so formal arg lowering needs to be able
truncate it back. Likewise, when dealing with returns of these types, they need
to be widened in the appropriate way back.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60425
llvm-svn: 358032
This lines up with what we do for regular subtract and it matches up better with X86 assumptions in isel patterns that add with immediate is more canonical than sub with immediate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60020
llvm-svn: 358027
One of out of tree targets has regressed with this patch. Reverting
it for now and let liveness to be fully reconstructed in case pass
was used after the LIS is created to resolve the regression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60466
llvm-svn: 358015
When bitcasting from a source op to a larger bitwidth op, split the demanded bits and OR them on top of one another and demand those merged bits in the SimplifyDemandedBits call on the source op.
llvm-svn: 357992
Summary:
With MergeValues() removed, amend DebugLocEntry's constructor so that it
takes multiple values rather than a single, and keep non-fragment values
in OpenRanges, as this allows some cleanup of the code in
buildLocationList().
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, loladiro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59303
llvm-svn: 357988
Summary:
The MergeValues() function would try to merge two entries if they shared
the same beginning label. Having the same beginning label means that the
former entry's range would be empty; however, after D55919 we no longer
create entries for empty ranges, so we can no longer land in a situation
where that check in MergeValues would succeed. Instead, the "merging" is
done by keeping the live values from the preceding empty ranges in
OpenRanges, and adding them to the first non-empty range.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, loladiro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59301
llvm-svn: 357974
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.
COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J
For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.
@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)
The DWARF generated for this is as follows.
DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4
Patch by Eric Schweitz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327
llvm-svn: 357934
Detect dead lanes can create some dead defs. Then RenameIndependentSubregs
will break a REG_SEQUENCE which may use these dead defs. At this point
a dead instruction can be removed but we do not run a DCE anymore.
MachineDCE was only running before live variable analysis. The patch
adds a mean to preserve LiveIntervals and SlotIndexes in case it works
past this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59626
llvm-svn: 357805
Second half of PR40800, this patch adds DAG undef handling to fcmp instructions to match the behavior in llvm::ConstantFoldCompareInstruction, this permits constant folding of vector comparisons where some elements had been reduced to UNDEF (by SimplifyDemandedVectorElts etc.).
This involves a lot of tweaking to reduced tests as bugpoint loves to reduce fcmp arguments to undef........
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60006
llvm-svn: 357765
There are a variety of vector patterns that may be profitably reduced to a
scalar op when scalar ops are performed using a subset (typically, the
first lane) of the vector register file.
For x86, this is true for float/double ops and element 0 because
insert/extract is just a sub-register rename.
Other targets should likely enable the hook in a similar way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60150
llvm-svn: 357760
Summary:
Teach SelectionDAG how to compute known bits of ISD::CopyFromReg if
the virtual reg used has one def only.
This can be particularly useful when calling isBaseWithConstantOffset()
with the ISD::CopyFromReg argument, as more optimizations may get enabled
in the result.
Also add a missing truncation on X86, found by testing of this patch.
Change-Id: Id1c9fceec862d118c54a5b53adf72ada5d6daefa
Reviewers: bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, javed.absar, jsji, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59535
llvm-svn: 357745
Amara Emerson