Summary:
Clang's raw Lexer doesn't produce any tokens for trailing backslashes in a line. This doesn't work with
LLDB's Clang highlighter which builds the source code to display from the list of tokens the Lexer returns.
This causes that lines with trailing backslashes are lacking the backslash and the following newline when
rendering source code in LLDB.
This patch removes the trailing newline from the current line we are highlighting. This way Clang doesn't
drop the backslash token and we just restore the newline after tokenising.
Fixes rdar://57091487
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, labath
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70177
Summary:
This patch updates the last user of ArgInfo::count and deletes
it. I also delete `GetNumInitArguments()` and `GetInitArgInfo()`.
Classess are callables and `GetArgInfo()` should work on them.
On python 3 it already works, of course. `inspect` is good.
On python 2 we have to add yet another special case. But hey if
python 2 wasn't crufty we wouln't need python 3.
I also delete `is_bound_method` becuase it is unused.
This path is tested in `TestStepScripted.py`
Reviewers: labath, mgorny, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69742
This is a quick followup to this commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa69bbe02a2352271e8b14542073f177e24c499c1
In that, I #pragma-squelch this warning in `ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp`
but we get the same warning in `PythonTestSuite.cpp`.
This patch squelches the same warning in the same way as the
reviweed commit. I'm submitting it without review under the
"obviously correct" rule.
At least if this is incorrect the main commit was also incorrect.
By the way, as far as I can tell, these functions are extern "C" because
SWIG does that to everything, not because they particularly need to be.
Summary:
Move breakpoints from the old, bad ArgInfo::count to the new, better
ArgInfo::max_positional_args. Soon ArgInfo::count will be no more.
It looks like this functionality is already well tested by
`TestBreakpointCommandsFromPython.py`, so there's no need to write
additional tests for it.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69468
The goal of this refactor is to enable ProcessMinidump to take into
account the loaded modules and their sections when computing the
permissions of various ranges of memory, as discussed in D66638.
This patch moves some of the responsibility for computing the ranges
from MinidumpParser into ProcessMinidump. MinidumpParser still does the
parsing, but ProcessMinidump becomes responsible for answering the
actual queries about memory ranges. This will enable it (in a follow-up
patch) to augment the information obtained from the parser with data
obtained from actual object files.
The changes in the actual code are fairly straight-forward and just
involve moving code around. MinidumpParser::GetMemoryRegions is renamed
to BuildMemoryRegions to emphasize that it does no caching. The only new
thing is the additional bool flag returned from this function. This
indicates whether the returned regions describe all memory mapped into
the target process. Data obtained from /proc/maps and the MemoryInfoList
stream is considered to be exhaustive. Data obtained from Memory(64)List
is not. This will be used to determine whether we need to augment the
data or not.
This reshuffle means that it is no longer possible/easy to test some of
this code via unit tests, as constructing a ProcessMinidump instance is
hard. Instead, I update the unit tests to only test the parsing of the
actual data, and test the answering of queries through a lit test using
the "memory region" command. The patch also includes some tweaks to the
MemoryRegion class to make the unit tests easier to write.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69035
For example, it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Foo", and
it is pretty easy to write a breakpoint command that implements "stop when my caller is Bar". But there's no
way to write a generic "stop when my caller is..." function, and then specify the caller when you add the
command to a breakpoint.
With this patch, you can pass this data in a SBStructuredData dictionary. That will get stored in
the PythonCommandBaton for the breakpoint, and passed to the implementation function (if it has the right
signature) when the breakpoint is hit. Then in lldb, you can say:
(lldb) break com add -F caller_is -k caller_name -v Foo
More generally this will allow us to write reusable Python breakpoint commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671
Looks like on windows googlemock regexes treat newlines differently
from on darwin. This patch fixes the regex in this test so it
will work on both.
Fixes: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69214
llvm-svn: 375477
Summary:
With this patch, only the no-argument form of `Reset()` remains in
PythonDataObjects. It also deletes PythonExceptionState in favor of
PythonException, because the only call-site of PythonExceptionState was
also using Reset, so I cleaned up both while I was there.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69214
llvm-svn: 375475
Summary:
This deletes `Reset(...)`, except for the no-argument form `Reset()`
from `TypedPythonObject`, and therefore from `PythonString`, `PythonList`,
etc.
It updates the various callers to use assignment, `As<>`, `Take<>`,
and `Retain<>`, as appropriate.
followon to https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69133
llvm-svn: 375350
Summary:
When users define a debugger command from python, they provide a callable
object. Because the signature of the function has been extended, LLDB
needs to inspect the number of parameters the callable can take.
The rule it was using to decide was weird, apparently not tested, and
giving wrong results for some kinds of python callables.
This patch replaces the weird rule with a simple one: if the callable can
take 5 arguments, it gets the 5 argument version of the signature.
Otherwise it gets the old 4 argument version.
It also adds tests with a bunch of different kinds of python callables
with both 4 and 5 arguments.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69014
llvm-svn: 375333
Summary: The types defined for it in LLDB are now redundant with core types.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68658
llvm-svn: 375243
Summary:
I'd like to eliminate all forms of Reset() and all public constructors
on these objects, so the only way to make them is with Take<> and Retain<>
and the only way to copy or move them is with actual c++ copy, move, or
assignment.
This is a simple place to start.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69080
llvm-svn: 375182
Summary:
The current implementation of PythonCallable::GetNumArguments
is not exception safe, has weird semantics, and is just plain
incorrect for some kinds of functions.
Python 3.3 introduces inspect.signature, which lets us easily
query for function signatures in a sane and documented way.
This patch leaves the old implementation in place for < 3.3,
but uses inspect.signature for modern pythons. It also leaves
the old weird semantics in place, but with FIXMEs grousing about
it. We should update the callers and fix the semantics in a
subsequent patch. It also adds some tests.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68995
llvm-svn: 375181
This patch removes the size_t return value and the append parameter
from the remainder of the Find.* functions in LLDB's internal API. As
in the previous patches, this is motivated by the fact that these
parameters aren't really used, and in the case of the append parameter
were frequently implemented incorrectly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69119
llvm-svn: 375160
Summary:
The previous attempt at making nameless process not match when searching for a
given name failed because the macos implementation was depending on this detail
in its partial matching strategy. Doing partial matching to avoid expensive
lookups is a perfectly valid thing to do, the way it was implemented seems
somewhat unexpected.
This patch implements it differently by providing special
methods in the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch which match only a subset of fields,
and changes mac host code to use those instead.
Then, it re-applies r373925 to get make the ProcessInstanceInfoMatch with a
name *not* match a nameless process.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, teemperor, jingham
Subscribers: wallace, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68631
llvm-svn: 374529
This patch adds an implementation of unwinding using PE EH info. It allows to
get almost ideal call stacks on 64-bit Windows systems (except some epilogue
cases, but I believe that they can be fixed with unwind plan disassembly
augmentation in the future).
To achieve the goal the CallFrameInfo abstraction was made. It is based on the
DWARFCallFrameInfo class interface with a few changes to make it less
DWARF-specific.
To implement the new interface for PECOFF object files the class PECallFrameInfo
was written. It uses the next helper classes:
- UnwindCodesIterator helps to iterate through UnwindCode structures (and
processes chained infos transparently);
- EHProgramBuilder with the use of UnwindCodesIterator constructs EHProgram;
- EHProgram is, by fact, a vector of EHInstructions. It creates an abstraction
over the low-level unwind codes and simplifies work with them. It contains
only the information that is relevant to unwinding in the unified form. Also
the required unwind codes are read from the object file only once with it;
- EHProgramRange allows to take a range of EHProgram and to build an unwind row
for it.
So, PECallFrameInfo builds the EHProgram with EHProgramBuilder, takes the ranges
corresponding to every offset in prologue and builds the rows of the resulted
unwind plan. The resulted plan covers the whole range of the function except the
epilogue.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith, amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, stella.stamenova, labath, espindola
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: leonid.mashinskiy, emaste, mgorny, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67347
llvm-svn: 374528
Unwind plan augmentation should compute the plan row at offset x from
the instruction before offset x, but currently we compute it from the
instruction at offset x. Note that this behavior is a regression
introduced when moving the x86 assembly inspection engine to its own
file
(1c9858b298 (diff-375a2be066db6f34bb9a71442c9b71fcL913));
the original version handled this properly by copying the previous
instruction out before advancing the instruction pointer.
The relevant bug with more info is here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43561
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68454
Patch by Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@google.com>.
llvm-svn: 374342
EXPECT_EQ contains an if-else statement. It also contains some magic to
suppress the dangling else warnings, but it seems that some new
compilers can see through that...
llvm-svn: 374341
Summary:
The `if (*cstr_end == '\0')` in the previous code checked if the previous loop terminated because it
found a null terminator or because it reached the end of the data. However, in the case that we hit
the end of the data before finding a null terminator, `cstr_end` points behind the last byte in our
data and `*cstr_end` reads the memory behind the array (which may be uninitialised)
This patch just rewrites that function use `std::find` and adds the relevant unit tests.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68773
llvm-svn: 374311
Stack unwinding was sometimes failing when trying to unwind stacks in 32 bit ARM. I discovered this was because the EH frame register numbers were not set. This patch fixes this issue and adds a unit test to verify this doesn't regress.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68088
llvm-svn: 374246
Testing whether a name is mangled or not is extremely cheap and can be
done by looking at the first two characters. Mangled knows how to do
it. On the flip side, many call sites that currently pass in an
is_mangled determination do not know how to correctly do it (for
example, they leave out Swift mangling prefixes).
This patch removes this entry point and just forced Mangled to
determine the mangledness of a string itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68674
llvm-svn: 374180
Summary:
This is a redo of D68069 because I reverted it due to some concerns that were now addressed along with the new comments that @labath added.
I found a case where the main android binary (app_process32) had thumb code at its entry point but no entry in the symbol table indicating this. This made lldb set a 4 byte breakpoint at that address (we default to arm code) instead of a 2 byte one (like we should for thumb).
The big deal with this is that the expression evaluator uses the entry point as a way to know when a JITed expression has finished executing by putting a breakpoint there. Because of this, evaluating expressions on certain android devices (Google Pixel something) made the process crash.
This was fixed by checking this specific situation when we parse the symbol table and add an artificial symbol for this 2 byte range and indicating that it's arm thumb.
I created 2 unit tests for this, one to check that now we know that the entry point is arm thumb, and the other to make sure we didn't change the behaviour for arm code.
I also run the following on the command line with the `app_process32` where I found the issue:
**Before:**
```
(lldb) dis -s 0x1640 -e 0x1644
app_process32[0x1640]: .long 0xf0004668 ; unknown opcode
```
**After:**
```
(lldb) dis -s 0x1640 -e 0x1644
app_process32`:
app_process32[0x1640] <+0>: mov r0, sp
app_process32[0x1642]: andeq r0, r0, r0
```
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, wallace, espindola
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits, MaskRay, kristof.beyls, arichardson, emaste, srhines
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68533
llvm-svn: 374132
I often use `ninja lldb-test-deps` to build all the test dependencies
before running a subset of the tests with `lit --filter`. This
functionality seems to break relatively often because test dependencies
are tracked in an ad-hoc way acrooss cmake files. This patch adds a
helper function `add_lldb_test_dependency` to unify test dependency
tracking by adding dependencies to lldb-test-deps.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68612
llvm-svn: 373996
Since D68289, a couple of tests on linux started being extremely flaky.
All of them were doing name-based attaching and were failing because
they couldn't find an unambiguous process to attach to.
The patch above changed the process finding logic, so that failure to
find a process name does not constitute an error. This meant that a lot
more transient processes showed up in the process list during the test
suite run. Previously, these processes would not appear as they would be
gone by the time we went to read their executable name, arguments, etc.
Now, this alone should not cause an issue were it not for the fact that
we were considering a process with no name as if it matched by default
(even if we were explicitly searching for a process with a specified
name). This meant that any of the "transient" processes with no name
would make the name match ambiguous. That clearly seems like a bug to me
so I fix that.
llvm-svn: 373925
Backing out because SymbolFile/Breakpad/symtab.test is failing and it seems to be a legit issue. Will investigate.
This reverts commit 72153f95ee4c1b52d2f4f483f0ea4f650ec863be.
llvm-svn: 373687
Summary:
I found a case where the main android binary (app_process32) had thumb code at its entry point but no entry in the symbol table indicating this. This made lldb set a 4 byte breakpoint at that address (we default to arm code) instead of a 2 byte one (like we should for thumb).
The big deal with this is that the expression evaluator uses the entry point as a way to know when a JITed expression has finished executing by putting a breakpoint there. Because of this, evaluating expressions on certain android devices (Google Pixel something) made the process crash.
This was fixed by checking this specific situation when we parse the symbol table and add an artificial symbol for this 2 byte range and indicating that it's arm thumb.
I created 2 unit tests for this, one to check that now we know that the entry point is arm thumb, and the other to make sure we didn't change the behaviour for arm code.
I also run the following on the command line with the `app_process32` where I found the issue:
**Before:**
```
(lldb) dis -s 0x1640 -e 0x1644
app_process32[0x1640]: .long 0xf0004668 ; unknown opcode
```
**After:**
```
(lldb) dis -s 0x1640 -e 0x1644
app_process32`:
app_process32[0x1640] <+0>: mov r0, sp
app_process32[0x1642]: andeq r0, r0, r0
```
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, wallace, espindola
Subscribers: srhines, emaste, arichardson, kristof.beyls, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68069
llvm-svn: 373680
This will allow us to write reusable scripted ThreadPlans, since
you can use key/value pairs with known keys in the plan to parametrize
its behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68366
llvm-svn: 373675
Summary:
This patch factors out File as an abstract base
class and moves most of its actual functionality into
a subclass called NativeFile. In the next patch,
I'm going to be adding subclasses of File that
don't necessarily have any connection to actual OS files,
so they will not inherit from NativeFile.
This patch was split out as a prerequisite for
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68188
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68317
llvm-svn: 373564
This patch is the final step in my quest to get rid of the JSON parser
in LLDB. Vedant's coverage report [1] shows that it was mostly untested.
Furthermore, the LLVM implementation has a much nicer API and using it
means one less thing to maintain for LLDB.
[1] http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68305
llvm-svn: 373501
Reason for this patch is the Ssame reason as for the previous patches:
Having a ClangASTContext and being able to switch the associated ASTContext isn't
a use case we have (or should have), so let's simplify all this code.
This way it becomes clearer in what order we initialize data structures.
The DWARFASTParserClangTests changes are necessary as the test is using
a ClangASTContext but relied on the fact that no called function ever calls
getASTContext() on our ClangASTContext (as that would create the ASTContext).
As we now always create the ASTContext the fact that we had an uninitialized
FileSystem made the test crash.
llvm-svn: 373457
The original test was passing false to the append argument of
FindTypes (the only use of this feature!). This patch now replicates
that by passing a fresh TypeMap into the function where applicable.
llvm-svn: 373409
This patch replaces the hand-rolled JSON emission in StructuredData with
LLVM's JSON library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68248
llvm-svn: 373359
Raphael Isemann