Summary:
This patch makes the versioning namespace libc++ uses customizable by the user using `-DLIBCXX_ABI_NAMESPACE=__foo`.
This allows users to build custom versions of libc++ which can be linked into binaries with other libc++ versions without causing symbol conflicts or ODR issues.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: kristina, smeenai, mgorny, phosek, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53879
llvm-svn: 345657
Summary:
This commit adopts the exclude_from_explicit_instantiation attribute discussed
at [1] and reviewed in [2] in libc++ to supplant the use of __always_inline__
for visibility purposes.
This change means that users wanting to link together translation units built
with different versions of libc++'s headers into the same final linked image
MUST define the _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU macro to 1 when building those
TUs. Doing otherwise will lead to ODR violations and ABI issues.
[1]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-August/059024.html
[2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51789
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52405
llvm-svn: 345516
Summary:
When building with -fvisibility=hidden, some symbols do not get exported from
libc++.dylib. This means that some entities are not explicitly given default
visibility in the source code, and that we rely on the fact -fvisibility=default
is the default. This commit explicitly gives default visibility to those
symbols to avoid being dependent on the command line flags used.
The commit also remove symbols from the dylib -- those symbols do not
actually need to be exported from the dylib and this should not be an
ABI break.
Finally, in the future, we may want to mark the whole std:: namespace as
having hidden visibility (to switch from opt-out to opt-in), in which
case the changes done in this commit will be required.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52662
llvm-svn: 345260
libc++ has dropped support for Mac OS 10.6 for a while, and we don't
have any testers set up for that OS.
This commit puts in an error message so that people can reach out to
the libc++ maintainers in case support for 10.6 is still expected (as
opposed to silently failing in weird ways). We can completely drop
support for 10.6 and remove the error message some time in the future
when we're sure that nobody is relying on it.
llvm-svn: 344576
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
We recently added libcxx-dev and libcxx-commits mailing lists.
This patch updates the libc++ documentation to correctly reference
the libc++ lists instead of the old Clang ones.
llvm-svn: 342816
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240 led to symbol size problems in Chromium, and
we expect this may be the case in other projects built in debug mode too.
Instead, unless users explicitly ask for internal_linkage, we use always_inline
like we used to.
In the future, when we have a solution that allows us to drop always_inline
without falling back on internal_linkage, we can replace always_inline by
that.
Note that this commit introduces a change in contract for existing libc++
users: by default, libc++ used to guarantee that TUs built with different
versions of libc++ could be linked together. With the introduction of the
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU macro, the default behavior is that TUs built
with different libc++ versions are not guaranteed to link. This is a change
in contract but not a change in behavior, since the current implementation
still allows linking TUs built with different libc++ versions together.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, dexonsmith, hans, rnk
Subscribers: christof, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50652
llvm-svn: 339874
Summary:
This macro allows hiding symbols from the ABI when the library is built
with an ABI version after ABI v1, which is currently the only stable ABI.
This commit defines `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY` to be
`_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1`, meaning that symbols that were only
exported by the library for historical reasons are not exported anymore
in the unstable ABI.
Because of that, this commit is an ABI break for ABI v2. This ABI version
is not stable, however, so this should not be a problem.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49914
llvm-svn: 339012
Summary:
This commit introduces a new macro, _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI, whose goal is to
mark functions that shouldn't be part of libc++'s ABI. It marks the functions
as being hidden for dylib visibility purposes, and as having internal linkage
using Clang's __attribute__((internal_linkage)) when available, and
__always_inline__ otherwise.
It replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which was always using __always_inline__
to achieve similar goals, but suffered from debuggability and code size problems.
The full proposal, along with more background information, can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058419.html
This commit does not rename uses of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI: this wide reaching but mechanical change can
be done later when we've confirmed we're happy with the new macro.
In the future, it would be nice if we could optionally allow dropping
any internal_linkage or __always_inline__ attribute, which could result
in code size improvements. However, this is currently impossible for
reasons explained here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-July/058450.html
Reviewers: EricWF, dexonsmith, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49240
llvm-svn: 338122
This patch implements the <filesystem> header and uses that
to provide <experimental/filesystem>.
Unlike other standard headers, the symbols needed for <filesystem>
have not yet been placed in libc++.so. Instead they live in the
new libc++fs.a library. Users of filesystem are required to link this
library. (Also note that libc++experimental no longer contains the
definition of <experimental/filesystem>, which now requires linking libc++fs).
The reason for keeping <filesystem> out of the dylib for now is that
it's still somewhat experimental, and the possibility of requiring an
ABI breaking change is very real. In the future the symbols will likely
be moved into the dylib, or the dylib will be made to link libc++fs automagically).
Note that moving the symbols out of libc++experimental may break user builds
until they update to -lc++fs. This should be OK, because the experimental
library provides no stability guarantees. However, I plan on looking into
ways we can force libc++experimental to automagically link libc++fs.
In order to use a single implementation and set of tests for <filesystem>, it
has been placed in a special `__fs` namespace. This namespace is inline in
C++17 onward, but not before that. As such implementation is available
in C++11 onward, but no filesystem namespace is present "directly", and
as such name conflicts shouldn't occur in C++11 or C++14.
llvm-svn: 338093
In upcoming changes to filesystem I plan to change file_time_type
to use __int128_t as its underlying representation, in order
to allow it to have a range and resolution at least that of
the timespec struct.
There was some pushback against this decision, so I drafted
a document explaining the problems, potential solutions, and
the rational for the decision.
However, it's probably easier to let people read the generated
HTML rather than the raw restructured text. For this reason
I'm commiting the design documents before hand, so they can
be available during any subsequent discussion or code review.
llvm-svn: 337880
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
This allows keeping libcxx using win32 threads even if a
version of pthread.h is installed.
This matches the existing cmake option LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_API.
Also add missing documentation about the internal define
_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_WIN32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41764
llvm-svn: 321896
This patch teaches the test suite configuration about the -std=c++2a
flag. And, since it's the newest dialect, change the test suite to
choose it, if possible, by default.
llvm-svn: 317611
This patch changes the test suite to attempt and prefer -std=c++17 over
-std=c++1z. It also fixes the REQUIRES and UNSUPPORTED lit markers
to refer to c++17 over c++1z.
llvm-svn: 317610
The vcruntime headers are hairy and clash with both libc++ headers
themselves and other libraries. libc++ normally deals with the clashes
by deferring to the vcruntime headers and silencing its own definitions,
but for clients which don't want to depend on vcruntime headers, it's
desirable to support the opposite, i.e. have libc++ provide its own
definitions.
Certain operator new/delete replacement scenarios are not currently
supported in this mode, which requires some tests to be marked XFAIL.
The added documentation has more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38522
llvm-svn: 315234
Some ABI macros affect headers, so it's nice to have a site config
option for them. Add a LIBCXX_ABI_DEFINES cmake macro to allow
specifying a list of ABI macros to define in the site config.
The primary design constraint (as discussed with Eric on IRC a while
back) was to not have to repeat the ABI macro names in cmake, which only
leaves a free-form cmake list as an option. A somewhat unfortunate
consequence is that we can't verify that the ABI macros being defined
actually exist, though we can at least perform some basic sanity
checking, since all the ABI macros begin with _LIBCPP_ABI_.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36719
llvm-svn: 314946
It has an extern template instantiation declaration in the headers and a
corresponding instantiation definition in the library, so we must mark
it with _LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS to make it available outside the library.
This doesn't cause any ABI changes as-is since we don't build libc++
with hidden visibility (so the function is exported anyway). It's needed
for building libc++ with hidden visibility, however.
Clarify the Windows behavior for extern function templates while I'm
here, since this exercises that behavior.
llvm-svn: 307966
This is going to be used by the runtime build in the multi-target
setup to allow using different install prefix for each target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33762
llvm-svn: 307615
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
When the libc++ extern template macros were added, the intent was for it
to be possible for consumers of the headers to disable extern templates
(via `-D_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(...)=`). Unfortunately, support for
specifying function-like macros varies on the command line varies across
compilers (e.g. MSVC doesn't support it at all), and cmake doesn't allow
it for the same reason. Add a non-function macro for this purpose.
The intended use is for libraries which want to use the libc++ headers
without taking a dependency on the libc++ library itself. I can name the
macro something which reflects its intent rather than its behavior (e.g.
`_LIBCPP_HEADER_ONLY`) if desired.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31725
llvm-svn: 300246
Summary:
Most classes annotated with _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS need to have at least some
of their members exported, otherwise we have a lot of link errors when
linking against a libc++ built with hidden visibility. This also makes
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS be consistent across platforms, since on Windows it
already exports members.
With this change made, any template methods of a class marked
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS will also get default visibility when instantiatied,
which is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish to control
their visibility; this is the same issue as PR30642. Annotate all
problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier to avoid this.
The problematic methods were found by running bad-visibility-finder [1]
against the libc++ headers after making the _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS change. The
small methods were marked for inlining; the larger ones hidden.
[1] https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208
llvm-svn: 296732
When building libc++ with hidden visibility, we want explicit template
instantiations to export members. This is consistent with existing
Windows behavior, and is necessary for clients to be able to link
against a hidden visibility built libc++ without running into lots of
missing symbols.
An unfortunate side effect, however, is that any template methods of a
class with an explicit instantiation will get default visibility when
instantiated, unless the methods are explicitly marked inline or hidden
visibility. This is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish
to control their visibility, and led to PR30642.
Annotate all problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier
to avoid this. The problematic methods were found by running
https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder against the libc++
headers after making the _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS change. The
methods were marked with the new _LIBCPP_METHOD_TEMPLATE_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION_VIS
macro, which was created for this purpose.
It should be noted that _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS was originally
intended to expand to default visibility, and was changed to expanding
to default type visibility to fix PR30642. The visibility macro
documentation was not updated accordingly, however, so this change makes
the macro consistent with its documentation again, while explicitly
fixing the methods which resulted in that PR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29157
llvm-svn: 296731
Summary:
This patch implements [P0003R5](http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0003r5.html) which removes exception specifications from C++17.
The only changes to the library are removing `set_unexpected`, `get_unexpected`, `unexpected`, and `unexpected_handler`. These functions can be re-enabled in C++17 using `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_UNEXPECTED_FUNCTIONS`.
@mclow.lists what do you think about removing stuff is this way?
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28172
llvm-svn: 295406
This covers how to build libc++ for Windows. This allows others to
replicate the MS ABI style build for libc++. It only depends on msvcrt
as it uses the Windows threading model and the Windows ABI and can serve
as an ABI compatible replacement for msvcprt.
llvm-svn: 294705
Eric Fiselier