Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
David Green d143c65de3 [DA] Enable -da-delinearize by default
This enables da-delinearize in Dependence Analysis for delinearizing array
accesses into multiple dimensions. This can help to increase the power of
Dependence analysis on multi-dimensional arrays and prevent having to fall
back to the slower and less accurate MIV tests. It adds static checks on the
bounds of the arrays to ensure that one dimension doesn't overflow into
another, and brings our code in line with our tests.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45872

llvm-svn: 335217
2018-06-21 11:53:16 +00:00
Florian Hahn 831a757728 [LoopInterchange] Preserve LoopInfo after interchanging.
LoopInterchange relies on LoopInfo being up-to-date, so we should
preserve it after interchanging. This patch updates restructureLoops to
move the BBs of the interchanged loops to the right place.

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45278

llvm-svn: 329264
2018-04-05 09:48:45 +00:00
Sebastian Pop bf6e1c26cf DA: remove uses of GEP, only ask SCEV
It's been quite some time the Dependence Analysis (DA) is broken,
as it uses the GEP representation to "identify" multi-dimensional arrays.
It even wrongly detects multi-dimensional arrays in single nested loops:

from test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/Coupled.ll, example @couple6
;; for (long int i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
;; A[i][3*i - 6] = i;
;; *B++ = A[i][i];

DA used to detect two subscripts, which makes no sense in the LLVM IR
or in C/C++ semantics, as there are no guarantees as in Fortran of
subscripts not overlapping into a next array dimension:

maximum nesting levels = 1
SrcPtrSCEV = %A
DstPtrSCEV = %A
using GEPs
subscript 0
    src = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
    dst = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
    class = 1
    loops = {1}
subscript 1
    src = {-6,+,3}<nsw><%for.body>
    dst = {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%for.body>
    class = 1
    loops = {1}
Separable = {}
Coupled = {1}

With the current patch, DA will correctly work on only one dimension:

maximum nesting levels = 1
SrcSCEV = {(-2424 + %A)<nsw>,+,1212}<%for.body>
DstSCEV = {%A,+,404}<%for.body>
subscript 0
    src = {(-2424 + %A)<nsw>,+,1212}<%for.body>
    dst = {%A,+,404}<%for.body>
    class = 1
    loops = {1}
Separable = {0}
Coupled = {}

This change removes all uses of GEP from DA, and we now only rely
on the SCEV representation.

The patch does not turn on -da-delinearize by default, and so the DA analysis
will be more conservative in the case of multi-dimensional memory accesses in
nested loops.

I disabled some interchange tests, as the DA is not able to disambiguate
the dependence anymore. To make DA stronger, we may need to
compute a bound on the number of iterations based on the access functions
and array dimensions.

The patch cleans up all the CHECKs in test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/*.ll to
avoid checking for snippets of LLVM IR: this form of checking is very hard to
maintain. Instead, we now check for output of the pass that are more meaningful
than dozens of lines of LLVM IR. Some tests now require -debug messages and thus
only enabled with asserts.

Patch written by Sebastian Pop and Aditya Kumar.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35430

llvm-svn: 326837
2018-03-06 21:55:59 +00:00
Florian Hahn c6296fea3f [LoopInterchange] Incrementally update the dominator tree.
We can use incremental dominator tree updates to avoid re-calculating
the dominator tree after interchanging 2 loops.

Reviewers: dmgreen, kuhar

Reviewed By: kuhar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43176

llvm-svn: 325122
2018-02-14 13:13:15 +00:00
Florian Hahn cd78345398 [LoopInterchange] Skip zext instructions when looking for induction var.
Summary:
SimplifyIndVar may introduce zext instructions to widen arguments of the
loop exit check. They should not prevent us from splitting the loop at
the induction variable, but maybe the check should be more conservative,
e.g. making sure it only extends arguments used by a comparison?

Reviewers: karthikthecool, mcrosier, mzolotukhin

Reviewed By: mcrosier

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34879

llvm-svn: 311783
2017-08-25 16:52:29 +00:00