pair, and a couple of pair-like implementation detail types. The
C++98/03 and 11 standards all specify that the copy constructor of
pair<int, int> is trivial. However as libc++ tracked the draft C++11
standard over the years, this copy constructor became non-trivial, and
then just recently was corrected back to trivial for C++11.
Unfortunately (for libc++1) the Itanium ABI specifies different calling
conventions for trivial and non-trivial copy constructors. Therefore
currently the C++03 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int> is ABI
incompatible with the C++11 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int>.
This is Bad(tm). This patch corrects the situation by making this copy
constructor trivial in C++03 mode as well.
Just in case it is needed for an incomplete C++11 compiler, libc++
retains the ability to support pair with rvalue references, but without
defaulted special members. However the pair needs non-trivial special
members to implement this special case, (as it did when clang was in
this place a couple of years ago).
During this work a bug was also found and fixed in
is_trivially_constructible.
And there is a minor drive-by fix in <__config> regarding
__type_visibility__.
A test is updated to ensure that the copy constructor of pair<int, int>
is trivial in both C++03 and C++11. This test will necessarily fail for
a compiler that implements rvalue references but not defaulted special
members.
llvm-svn: 194536
http://lab.llvm.org:8013/builders/libcxx_clang-x86_64-darwin11-RA
lit.py: <string>:230: note: inferred use_system_lib as: False
lit.py: <string>:247: fatal: C++ ABI setting None unsupported for tests
cxx_abi is geting set to None, and the lit script errors out shortly after
that. This patch changes the default of cxx_abi from None to 'libcxxabi'.
This is likely not the right way to fix this problem. However it gets the
buildbot running again. Improvements to this fix are welcome.
llvm-svn: 192609
Linking against libstdc++, rather than libsupc++, is probably better
for people who need to link against clients of libstdc++. Because
libsupc++ is provided only as a static library, its globals are not
shared between the static library and the copy linked into libstdc++.
This has been found to cause at least one test failure.
This also removes a number of symbols which were multiply defined
between libstdc++ and libc++, only when linking with libstdc++.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1825
llvm-svn: 192075
iterator, allocator) constructor with the intention of it being
implicitly converted to the allocator type, it is possible for overload
resolution to favour the (iterator, iterator, enable_if) constructor.
Eliminate this possibility by moving the enable_if to one of the
existing arguments and removing the third argument.
llvm-svn: 191145
- The lit builtin XFAIL handling is more restrictive than what we were
previously using, and for now I'd rather keep the lit one restrictive.
llvm-svn: 189692
1. I had been detecting and trapping iterator == and \!= among iterators
in different containers as an error. But the trapping itself is actually
an error.
Consider:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
template <class C>
void
display(const C& c)
{
std::cout << "{";
bool first = true;
for (const auto& x : c)
{
if (\!first)
std::cout << ", ";
first = false;
std::cout << x;
}
std::cout << "}\n";
}
int
main()
{
typedef std::vector<int> V;
V v1 = {1, 3, 5};
V v2 = {2, 4, 6};
display(v1);
display(v2);
V::iterator i = std::find(v1.begin(), v1.end(), 1);
V::iterator j = std::find(v2.begin(), v2.end(), 2);
if (*i == *j)
i = j; // perfectly legal
// ...
if (i \!= j) // the only way to check
v2.push_back(*i);
display(v1);
display(v2);
}
It is legal to assign an iterator from one container to another of the
same type. This is required to work. One might want to test whether or
not such an assignment had been made. The way one performs such a check
is using the iterator's ==, \!= operator. This is a logical and necessary
function and does not constitute an error.
2. I had a header circular dependence bug when _LIBCPP_DEBUG2 is defined.
This caused a problem in several of the libc++ tests.
Fixed.
3. There is a serious problem when _LIBCPP_DEBUG2=1 at the moment in that
std::basic_string is inoperable. std::basic_string uses __wrap_iterator
to implement its iterators. __wrap_iterator has been rigged up in debug
mode to support vector. But string hasn't been rigged up yet. This means
that one gets false positives when using std::string in debug mode. I've
upped std::string's priority in www/debug_mode.html.
llvm-svn: 187636
MSVC-specific, MSVCRT-specific, or Windows-specific. Because Clang can
also define _MSC_VER, and MSVCRT is not necessarily the only C runtime,
these macros should not be used interchangeably.
This patch divides all Windows-related bits into the aforementioned
categories. Two new macros are introduced:
- _LIBCPP_MSVC: Defined when compiling with MSVC. Detected using
_MSC_VER, excluding Clang.
- _LIBCPP_MSVCRT: Defined when using the Microsoft CRT. This is the default
when _WIN32 is defined.
This leaves _WIN32 for code using the Windows API.
This also corrects the spelling of _LIBCP_HAS_IS_BASE_OF to _LIBCPP_HAS_IS_BASE_OF.
Nico, please prepare a patch for CREDITS.TXT, thanks.
llvm-svn: 187593
There are actually two debug modes:
1. -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG2 or -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG2=1
This is a relatively expensive debug mode, but very thorough. This is normally what you want to debug with, but may turn O(1) operations into O(N) operations.
2. -D_LIBCPP_DEBUG2=0
This is "debug lite." Only preconditions that can be checked with O(1) expense are checked. For example range checking on an indexing operation. But not iterator validity.
llvm-svn: 187369
Marshall Clow