With this change, for `#include <ar.h>`, `clang --target=aarch64-linux-gnu`
will read `/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/include/ar.h`
(on Debian gcc->gcc-cross)
instead of `/usr/include/ar.h`. Some glibc headers (e.g. gnu/stubs.h) are different across architectures.
Seem unnecessary to diverge from GCC here.
Beside, lib/../$OSLibDir can be considered closer to the GCC
installation then the system root. The comment should not apply.
After path resolution, it duplicates a subsequent -L entry. The entry below
(lib/gcc/$triple/$version/../../../../$OSLibDir) usually does not exist (e.g.
Arch Linux; Debian cross gcc). When it exists, it typically just has ld.so (e.g.
Debian native gcc) which cannot cause collision. Removing the -L (similar to
reordering it) is therefore justified.
This makes the settings available for use in other passes by housing
them within the Support lib, but NFC otherwise.
See D98898 for the proposed usage in SimplifyCFG
(where this change was originally included).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98945
so that when --sysroot is specified, the detected GCC installation will not be
overridden by another from /usr which happens to have a larger version.
This behavior is particularly inconvenient when the system has a larger version
GCC while the user wants to try out an older sysroot.
Delete some tests from linux-ld.c which overlap with cross-linux.c
In GCC, if `-B $prefix` is specified, `$prefix` is used to find executable files and startup files.
`$prefix/include` is added as an include search directory.
Clang overloads -B with GCC installation detection semantics which make the
behavior less predictable (due to the "largest GCC version wins" rule) and
interact poorly with --gcc-toolchain (--gcc-toolchain can be overridden by -B).
* `clang++ foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `/usr`.
* `clang++ --gcc-toolchain=Inputs foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `Inputs`.
* `clang++ -BA --gcc-toolchain=B foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under A and B and the larger version wins. With this patch, only B is used for detection.
* `clang++ -BA foo.cpp` detects GCC installation under `A` and `/usr`, and the larger GCC version wins. With this patch `A` is not used for detection.
This patch changes -B to drop the GCC detection semantics. Its executable
searching semantics are preserved. --gcc-toolchain is the recommended option to
specify the GCC installation detection directory.
(
Note: Clang detects GCC installation in various target dependent directories.
`$sysroot/usr` (sysroot defaults to "") is a common directory used by most targets.
Such a directory is expected to contain something like `lib{,32,64}/gcc{,-cross}/$triple`.
Clang will then construct library/include paths from the directory.
)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97993
This patch adds a new command line option to clang which outputs the directory containing clangs runtime libraries to stdout.
The primary use case for this command line flag is for build systems using clang-cl. Build systems when using clang-cl invoke the linker, that is either link or lld-link in this case, directly instead of invoking the compiler for the linking process as is common with the other drivers. This leads to issues when runtime libraries of clang, such as sanitizers or profiling, have to be linked in as the compiler cannot communicate the link directory to the linker.
Using this flag, build systems would be capable of getting the directory containing all of clang's runtime libraries and add it to the linker path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98868
It is possible that imported `SourceLocExpr` can cause not expected behavior (if `__builtin_LINE()` is used together with `__LINE__` for example) but still it may be worth to import these because some projects use it.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98876
This requires changes to TableGen files and some C++ files due to
incompatible multiclass template arguments that slipped through
before the improved handling.
At the moment "link.exe" is hard-coded as default linker in MSVC.cpp,
so there's no way to use LLD as default linker for MSVC driver.
This patch adds checking of CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER to MSVC.cpp and
updates unit-tests that expect link.exe linker to explicitly select it
via -fuse-ld=link, so that buildbots and other builds that set
-DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=foobar don't fail these tests.
This is a squash of
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D98493 (MSVC.cpp change) and
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D98862 (unit-tests change)
Reviewed By: maxim-kuvyrkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98935
Clang currently automates a fair amount of diagnostic checking for
declaration attributes based on the declarations in Attr.td. It checks
for things like subject appertainment, number of arguments, language
options, etc. This patch uses the same machinery to perform diagnostic
checking on statement attributes.
This patch consists of the initial changes to help distinguish between text and binary content correctly on z/OS. I would like to get feedback from Windows users on setting OF_None for all ToolOutputFiles. This seems to have been done as an optimization to prevent CRLF translation on Windows in the past.
Reviewed By: zibi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97785
C functions may be declared and defined in different prototypes like below. This patch unifies the checks for mangling names in symbol linkage name emission and debug linkage name emission so that the two names are consistent.
static int go(int);
static int go(a) int a;
{
return a;
}
Test Plan:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98799
These experimental builtin functions and the feature macro they were gated
behind have been removed.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98907
Updates the names (e.g. widen => extend, saturate => sat) and opcodes of all
SIMD instructions to match the finalized SIMD spec. Deliberately does not change
the public interface in wasm_simd128.h yet; that will require more care.
Depends on D98466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98676
Removes the instruction definitions, intrinsics, and builtins for qfma/qfms,
signselect, and prefetch instructions, which were not included in the final
WebAssembly SIMD spec.
Depends on D98457.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98466
Now that the WebAssembly SIMD specification is finalized and engines are
generally up-to-date, there is no need for a separate target feature for gating
SIMD instructions that engines have not implemented. With this change,
v128.const is now enabled by default with the simd128 target feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98457
This reverts commit 11b70b9e3a.
The bot failure was due to ArgumentPromotion deleting functions
without deleting their analyses. This was separately fixed in 4b1c807.
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support to extend the
existing 'destroy' clause for use with the 'interop' directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98834
Adds support for `-fget-symbols-sources` in the new Flang driver. All
relevant tests are updated to use the new driver when
`FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set.
`RUN` lines in tests are updated so `-fsyntax-only`
comes before `-fget-symbols-sources`. That's because:
* both `-fsyntax-only` and `-fget-symbols-sources` are
action flags, and
* the new driver, flang-new, will only consider the right-most
action flag.
In other words, this change is needed so that the tests work with both
`f18` (requires both flags) and `flang-new` (only considers the last
action flag).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98191
The `int` and `long` versions of these builtins already provide the
necessary overloads for `intptr_t` and `uintptr_t` arguments, as
`ASTContext` defines `atomic_(u)intptr_t` in terms of the `int` or
`long` types.
Prior to this patch, calls to those builtins with particular argument
types resulted in call-is-ambiguous errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98520
Clang test acle_sve_ld1.sh is missing the colon in one of the string
variable definition separating the variable name from the regex. This
leads the substitution block to be parsed as a numeric variable use.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98852
After the import, we did not copy the `TSCSpec`.
This commit resolves that.
Reviewed By: balazske
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98707
This patch is a second attempt at fixing a link error for MSVC
entry points when calling conventions are specified using a flag.
Calling conventions specified using flags should not be applied to MSVC
entry points. The default calling convention is set in this case. The
default calling convention for MSVC entry points main and wmain is cdecl.
For WinMain, wWinMain and DllMain, the default calling convention is
stdcall on 32 bit Windows.
Explicitly specified calling conventions are applied to MSVC entry points.
For MinGW, the default calling convention for all MSVC entry points is
cdecl.
First attempt: 4cff1b40da
Revert of first attempt: bebfc3b92d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97941
Cleanup attribute allows users to attach a destructor-like functions
to variable declarations to be called whenever they leave the scope.
The logic of such functions is not supported by the Clang's CFG and
is too hard to be reasoned about. In order to avoid false positives
in this situation, we assume that we didn't see ALL of the executtion
paths of the function and, thus, can warn only about multiple call
violation.
rdar://74441906
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98694
This patch introduces a very simple inter-procedural analysis
between blocks and enclosing functions.
We always analyze blocks first (analysis is done as part of semantic
analysis that goes side-by-side with the parsing process), and at the
moment of reporting we don't know how that block will be actually
used.
This patch introduces new logic delaying reports of the "never called"
warnings on blocks. If we are not sure that the block will be called
exactly once, we shouldn't warn our users about that. Double calls,
however, don't require such delays. While analyzing the enclosing
function, we can actually decide what we should do with those
warnings.
Additionally, as a side effect, we can be more confident about blocks
in such context and can treat them not as escapes, but as direct
calls.
rdar://74090107
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98688
Fangrui Song