This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting EFLAGS
actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this needlessly
creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD, CLD,
and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the correct
datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as necessary
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
llvm-svn: 329673
This adds a new instrinsic to support the rdpid instruction. The implementation is a bit weird because the intrinsic is defined as always returning 32-bits, but the assembler support thinks the instruction produces a 64-bit register in 64-bit mode. But really it zeros the upper 32 bits. So I had to add separate patterns where 64-bit mode uses an extract_subreg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42205
llvm-svn: 322910
CET (Control-Flow Enforcement Technology) introduces a new mechanism called IBT (Indirect Branch Tracking).
According to IBT, each Indirect branch should land on dedicated ENDBR instruction (End Branch).
The new pass adds ENDBR instructions for every indirect jmp/call (including jumps using jump tables / switches).
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40482
Change-Id: Icb754489faf483a95248f96982a4e8b1009eb709
llvm-svn: 322062
The asm parser wasn't preventing these from being accepted in 32-bit mode. Instructions that use a GR64 register are protected by the parser rejecting the register in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320846
This has no effect due to a top level "let Predicates =" around the instructions. But its also not required because the GR64 usage in the instruction guarantees it can never match.
llvm-svn: 320843
There was a top level "let Predicates =" in the .td file that was overriding the Requires on each instruction.
I've added an assert to the code emitter to catch more cases like this. I'm sure this isn't the only place where the right predicates aren't being applied. This assert already found that we don't block btq/btsq/btrq in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320830
Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only.
The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address.
If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered.
The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP).
The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism.
The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT.
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223
Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4
llvm-svn: 318996
I don't think this changes anything functionally yet, but I plan to fix the disassembler to use this to disable matching certain instructions with 0xf3/0xf2/0x66 prefixes.
llvm-svn: 316337
Throughout the effort of automatically generating the X86 memory folding tables these missing information were encountered.
This is a preparation work for a future patch including the automation of these tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31714
llvm-svn: 300190
A UD2 might make its way into the program via a call to @llvm.trap.
Obviously, calls are not terminators. However, we modeled the X86
instruction, UD2, as a terminator. Later on, this confuses the epilogue
insertion machinery which results in the epilogue getting inserted
before the UD2. For some platforms, like x64, the result is a
violation of the ABI.
Instead, model UD2/UD2B as a side effecting instruction which may
observe memory.
llvm-svn: 278144
Their opcodes are used as part of the VEX prefix in 64-bit mode. Clearly the disassembler implicitly decoded them as AVX instructions in 64-bit mode, but I think the AsmParser would have encoded them.
llvm-svn: 258793
This fixes an issue where MS inline assembly containing xgetbv wouldn't
be marked as clobbering EAX:EDX. Test for that forthcoming on the Clang
side.
llvm-svn: 217173
This patch adds support for a new builtin instruction called
__builtin_ia32_rdpmc.
Builtin '__builtin_ia32_rdpmc' is defined as a 'GCC builtin'; on X86, it can
be used to read performance monitoring counters. It takes as input the index
of the performance counter to read, and returns the value of the specified
performance counter as a 64-bit number.
Calls to this new builtin will map to instruction RDPMC.
The index in input to the builtin call is moved to register %ECX. The result
of the builtin call is the value of the specified performance counter (RDPMC
would return that quantity in registers RDX:RAX).
This patch:
- Adds builtin int_x86_rdpmc as a GCCBuiltin;
- Adds a new x86 DAG node called 'RDPMC_DAG';
- Teaches how to lower this new builtin;
- Adds an ISel pattern to select instruction RDPMC;
- Fixes the definition of instruction RDPMC adding %RAX and %RDX as
implicit definitions, and adding %ECX as implicit use;
- Adds a LLVM test to verify that the new builtin is correctly selected.
llvm-svn: 212049
This patch:
- Adds two new X86 builtin intrinsics ('int_x86_rdtsc' and
'int_x86_rdtscp') as GCCBuiltin intrinsics;
- Teaches the backend how to lower the two new builtins;
- Introduces a common function to lower READCYCLECOUNTER dag nodes
and the two new rdtsc/rdtscp intrinsics;
- Improves (and extends) the existing x86 test 'rdtsc.ll'; now test 'rdtsc.ll'
correctly verifies that both READCYCLECOUNTER and the two new intrinsics
work fine for both 64bit and 32bit Subtargets.
llvm-svn: 207127
Chandler Carruth