WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
dyncast is just due to \r\n newline interaction w/ regexps. The remap-load.c
failure is a bit stranger (the end of the extent is on the next line), but I
don't care to investigate.
llvm-svn: 95071
arguments. Fix a bug where incomplete explicit specializations were being
passed through as legitimate. Fix a bug where the absence of an explicit
specialization in an overload set was causing overall deduction to fail.
Fixes PR6191.
llvm-svn: 95052
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
- In C++, prior to the closing '}', set the type of enumerators
based on the type of their initializer. Don't perform unary
conversions on the enumerator values.
- In C++, handle overflow when an enumerator has no initializer and
its value cannot be represented in the type of the previous
enumerator.
- In C, handle overflow more gracefully, by complaining and then
falling back to the C++ rules.
- In C, if the enumerator value is representable in an int, convert the
expression to the type 'int'.
Fixes PR5854 and PR4515.
llvm-svn: 95031
by setting the section of the generated global. This is an
optimization done by the code generator, and the code being
removed didn't handle the case when the string contained an
embedded nul (which the code generator does correctly
handle). This is rdar://7589850
llvm-svn: 95003
when checking if the format specifier matches the type of the data
argument and the length modifier indicates the data type is 'char' or
'short'.
llvm-svn: 94992
arguments. This both prevents meaningless checks on these arguments and ensures
that they are represented as an expression by the instantiation.
Cleaned up and added standard text to the relevant test case. Also started
adding tests for *rejected* cases. At least one FIXME here where (I think) we
allow something we shouldn't. More to come in the area of rejecting crazy
arguments with decent diagnostics. Suggestions welcome for still better
diagnostics on these errors!
llvm-svn: 94953
(necessarily simultaneous) changes:
- CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer
rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The
single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including
constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries
created by the initializer (which we never handled
before!).
- Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers,
since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer.
- Switched base and member initialization over to the new
initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it
- Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when
initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced
by the previous (special-purpose) code.
- Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in
templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is
rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the
type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This
simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in
the AST.
- When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a
dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the
AST, because they'll look like they were explicit.
- Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to
initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it
from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of
constructor.
There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not
regress, for example:
- Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that
does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this
diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for
variables. That's fixed now.
- When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and
copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor
when we're defining the body.
llvm-svn: 94952
Fariborz Jahanian