WHAT!?!
It turns out that Type::isPromotableIntegerType() was not considering
enumeration types to be promotable, so we would never do the
promotion despite having properly computed the promotion type when the
enum was defined. Various operations on values of enum type just
"worked" because we could still compute the integer rank of an enum
type; the oddity, however, is that operations such as "add an enum and
an unsigned" would often have an enum result type (!). The bug
actually showed up as a spurious -Wformat diagnostic
(<rdar://problem/7595366>), but in theory it could cause miscompiles.
In this commit:
- Enum types with a promotion type of "int" or "unsigned int" are
promotable.
- Tweaked the computation of promotable types for enums
- For all of the ABIs, treat enum types the same way as their
underlying types (*not* their promotion types) for argument passing
and return values
- Extend the ABI tester with support for enumeration types
llvm-svn: 95117
dyncast is just due to \r\n newline interaction w/ regexps. The remap-load.c
failure is a bit stranger (the end of the extent is on the next line), but I
don't care to investigate.
llvm-svn: 95071
side effect, this also fixes some cases on Windows where the file would end up
on a different drive, because tmpnam doesn't include the drive component. PR3837
strikes again.
llvm-svn: 95067
arguments. Fix a bug where incomplete explicit specializations were being
passed through as legitimate. Fix a bug where the absence of an explicit
specialization in an overload set was causing overall deduction to fail.
Fixes PR6191.
llvm-svn: 95052
This is to address a serious performance problem observed when running
'clang -fsyntax-only' on really broken source files. In one case,
repeatedly calling CorrectTypo() caused one source file to be rejected
after 2 minutes instead of 1 second.
This patch causes typo correction to take neglible time on that file
while still providing correction results for the first 20 cases. I
felt this was a reasonable number for moderately broken source files.
I don't claim this is the best solution. Comments welcome. It is
necessary for us to address this issue because it is a serious
performance problem.
llvm-svn: 95049
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
- In C++, prior to the closing '}', set the type of enumerators
based on the type of their initializer. Don't perform unary
conversions on the enumerator values.
- In C++, handle overflow when an enumerator has no initializer and
its value cannot be represented in the type of the previous
enumerator.
- In C, handle overflow more gracefully, by complaining and then
falling back to the C++ rules.
- In C, if the enumerator value is representable in an int, convert the
expression to the type 'int'.
Fixes PR5854 and PR4515.
llvm-svn: 95031
Fariborz Jahanian