Summary:
When we create a fragment expression, and there already is an
old fragment expression, we assert that the new fragment is
within the range for the old fragment.
If for example the old fragment expression says that we
describe bit 10-16 of a variable (Offset=10, Size=6),
and we now want to create a new fragment expression only
describing bit 3-6 of the original value, then the resulting
fragment expression should have Offset=13, Size=3.
The assert is supposed to catch if the resulting fragment
expression is outside the range for the old fragment. However,
it used to verify that the Offset+Size of the new fragment was
smaller or equal than Offset+Size for the old fragment. What
we really want to check is that Offset+Size of the new fragment
is smaller than the Size of the old fragment.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46391
llvm-svn: 331465
Summary:
This reverts SVN r331441 (reapplies r331337), together with a fix
in to handle an already existing fragment expression in the
dbg.value that must be fragmented due to a split PHI node.
This should solve the problem seen in PR37321, which was the
reason for the revert of r331337.
The situation in PR37321 is that we have a PHI node like this
%u.sroa = phi i80 [ %u.sroa.x, %if.x ],
[ %u.sroa.y, %if.y ],
[ %u.sroa.z, %if.z ]
and a dbg.value like this
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i80 %u.sroa,
metadata !13,
metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 80))
The phi node is split into three 32-bit PHI nodes
%30:gr32 = PHI %11:gr32, %bb.4, %14:gr32, %bb.5, %27:gr32, %bb.8
%31:gr32 = PHI %12:gr32, %bb.4, %15:gr32, %bb.5, %28:gr32, %bb.8
%32:gr32 = PHI %13:gr32, %bb.4, %16:gr32, %bb.5, %29:gr32, %bb.8
but since the original value only is 80 bits we need to adjust the size
of the last fragment expression, and with this patch we get
DBG_VALUE debug-use %30:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)
DBG_VALUE debug-use %31:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 32)
DBG_VALUE debug-use %32:gr32, debug-use $noreg, !"u", !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 64, 16)
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, mstorsjo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46384
llvm-svn: 331464
This patch restructures part of LLDB's testing configuration:
1. I moved the test dependencies up the chain so every dotest dependency
becomes a lit dependency as well. It wouldn't make sense for dotest to
have other dependencies when it's being run by lit. Lit on the other
hand can still specify extra dependencies.
2. I replaced as much generator expressions with variables as possible.
This is consistent with the rest of LLVM and doesn't break generators
that support multiple targets (MSVC, Xcode). This wasn't a problem
before, but now we need to expand the dotest arguments in the lit
configuration and there's only one test suite even with multiple
targets.
3. I moved lldb-dotest into it's own directory under utils since there's
no need anymore for it to located under `test/`.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46334
llvm-svn: 331463
This is a change that only affects Swift and is NFC for the language
plugins on llvm.org. In Swift, we can have global variables with a
location such as DW_OP_addr <addr> DW_OP_deref. The DWARF expression
evaluator doesn't know how to apply a DW_OP_deref to a file address,
but at the very end we convert the file address into a load address.
This patch moves the file->load address conversion to right after the
result of the DW_OP_addr is pushed onto the stack so that a subsequent
DW_OP_deref (and potentially other operations) can be interpreted.
rdar://problem/39767528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362
llvm-svn: 331462
Calling convention attributes notionally appertain to the function type -- they modify the mangling of the function, change the behavior of assignment operations, etc. This commit allows the calling convention attributes to be written in the type position as well as the declaration position.
llvm-svn: 331459
The function can only return in one of two ways: the Predicate value is
successfully set within the allotted time, or it isn't (the wait times
out). These states can be represented in the return value, and the extra
arg adds no value.
llvm-svn: 331458
Remove the `AnalyzeTemporaryDtors` option, since the corresponding
`cfg-temporary-dtors` option of the Static Analyzer defaults to `true` since
r326461.
llvm-svn: 331456
These tests are for DAGCombiner::foldSelectCCToShiftAnd().
Right now, they were only tested for AArch64,
but given the upcoming X86 changes to the hasAndNot(),
the test coverage needs to be added.
These tests originated from D27489 / rL289738
llvm-svn: 331454
The code to encode the result in relocateOne for the relocations:
R_AARCH64_LD64_GOT_LO12_NC
R_AARCH64_TLSIE_LD64_GOTTPREL_LO12_NC
R_AARCH64_TLSDESC_LD64_LO12
is equivalent to that for R_AARCH64_LDST64_ABS_LO12_NC. This is described
in the ABI as "Set the LD/ST immediate field bits [11:3] of X. No overflow
check; check that X&7 =0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46247
llvm-svn: 331452
By default LLVM thinks very large vectors get aligned to their size when
passed across functions. Unfortunately no-one told the ARM backend so it
doesn't trigger stack realignment and so accesses can cause the usual
misalignment issues (e.g. a data abort).
This changes the ABI alignment to the stack alignment, which in practice
(and as a bonus) also coincides with the alignment "natural" vectors get.
llvm-svn: 331451
This is a follow-up change to r331150. The CL moved the macro from individual
file to build file, but the macro is missed in a test config file.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46385
Patch from Taiju Tsuiki <tzik@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 331450
Summary:
lldb-test already had the ability to dump all symbol information in a
module. This is interesting, but it can be too verbose, and it also does
not use the same APIs that lldb uses to query symbol information. The
last part is interesting to me now, because I am about to add DWARF v5
debug_names support, which needs to implement these APIs.
This patch adds a set of arguments to lldb-test, which modify it's
behavior from dumping all symbols to dumping only the requested
information:
- --find={function,namespace,type,variable} - search for the given
kind of objects.
- --name - the name to search for.
- --regex - whether to treat the "name" as a regular expression. This is
not available for all lookup types (we do not have the required APIs
for namespaces and types).
- --context - specifies the context, which can be used to restrict the
search. This argument takes a variable name (which must be defined and
be unique), and we then use the context that this variable is defined
in as the search context.
- --function-flags={auto,full,base,method,selector} - a set of flags to
further restrict the search for function symbols.
Together, these flags and their combinations cover the main SymbolFile
entry points which I will need to modify for the accelerator table
support, and so I plan to do most of the regression testing this way.
(I've also found this a useful tool for exploration of what the given
APIs are supposed to do.)
I add a couple of tests to demonstrate the usage of the usage of the
various options, and also an xfailed test which demonstrates a bug I
found while playing with this. The only requirement for these tests is
the presence of lld -- the should run on any platform which is able to
build lldb.
These tests use c++ code as input, but this isn't a requirement. It is also
possible to use IR, assembly or json to create the test module.
Reviewers: davide, zturner, asmith, JDevlieghere, clayborg, alexshap
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46318
llvm-svn: 331447
Also retagged VDBPSADBW instructions as SchedWritePSADBW instead of SchedWriteVecIMul which matches the behaviour on SkylakeServer (the only thing that supports it...)
llvm-svn: 331445
The code fails to check that the same value is used twice. We only make sure the left hand side of the and is part of the loop recurrence. The 'x' in the subtract can be any value.
llvm-svn: 331436
It's OK to either flush to 0 or return denormal result if the device
does not support denormals. See sec 7.2 and 7.5.3 of OCL specs.
Fixes CTS on carrizo and turks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewer: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 331435
double version passes on carrizo. float version fails on denormals.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewer: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 331434
Add overloads for `__len__` and `__getitem__` to allow use of this class
on Linux as well as Windows. With these overloads, lit can be used on
both hosts for the swift testsuite.
llvm-svn: 331431
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
This patch was temporarily reverted because it has exposed bug 37229 on
PowerPC platform. The bug is unrelated to the patch and was just a general
bug in the optimization done for PowerPC platform only. The bug was fixed
by the patch rL331410.
This patch returns the disabled commit since the bug was fixed.
llvm-svn: 331427
This changes some aspects of the build that are not relevant or useful
for Fuchsia like setting the RPATH/RUNPATH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46361
llvm-svn: 331425
These are necessary changes to support building LLVM for Fuchsia.
While these are not sufficient to run on Fuchsia, they are still
useful when cross-compiling LLVM libraries and runtimes for Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46345
llvm-svn: 331423
the method declaration is unavailable for an app extension platform
Rationale:
Classes are often shared between an app extension code and
non-app extension code. There's no way to remove the implementation
using preprocessor when building the app extension, so we should not warn here.
rdar://38150617
llvm-svn: 331421
Joel E. Denny