Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stanislav Mekhanoshin d5a465866e [AMDGPU] Omit buffer resource with flat scratch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90979
2020-11-09 08:05:20 -08:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin 038d884a50 [AMDGPU] Use flat scratch instructions where available
The support is disabled by default. So far there is instruction
selection, spilling, and frame elimination. It also changes SP
from unswizzled to swizzled as used by flat scratch instructions,
so it cannot be mixed with MUBUF stack access.

At the very least missing:

- GlobalISel;
- Some optimizations in frame elimination in between vector
  and scalar ALU;
- It shall finally allow to always materialize frame index
  as an SGPR, but that is not implemented and frame elimination
  cannot handle it yet;
- Unaligned and/or multidword flat scratch shall work, but it
  is legalized now for MUBUF;
- Operand folding cannot optimize FI like with MUBUF yet;
- It will need scaling the value of the SP/FP in the DWARF
  expression to recover the unswizzled scratch address;

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89170
2020-10-26 14:40:42 -07:00
Sebastian Neubauer a343b9b032 Revert "[AMDGPU] Insert waitcnt after returning from call"
This reverts commit ca907bfb57.

According to michel.daenzer,
> This completely broke the Mesa radeonsi driver on Navi 14. Xorg +
> xterm come up with major corruption & psychedelic colours.
2020-09-23 17:16:39 +02:00
Sebastian Neubauer ca907bfb57 [AMDGPU] Insert waitcnt after returning from call
When memory operations are outstanding on function calls, either the
caller or the callee can insert a waitcnt to ensure that all reads are
finished.
Calls need some time to be executed, so if the callee inserts the
waitcnt, filling the instruction buffer and waiting for memory will be
interleaved, hiding some latency. This comes at the cost of having a
waitcnt inside functions that may not be needed as no memory operations
are outstanding.

For function calls, this is already implemented. The same principal
applies to returns: If the caller inserts a waitcnt after the call, the
callee does not have to wait and the return and memory operation can be
run in parallel.

This commit implements waiting in the caller after returning from a
function call.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87674
2020-09-23 12:17:59 +02:00
Jay Foad c799f873cb [AMDGPU] Don't cluster stores
Clustering loads has caching benefits, but as far as I know there is no
advantage to clustering stores on any AMDGPU subtargets.

The disadvantage is that it tends to increase register pressure and
restricts scheduling freedom.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85530
2020-09-14 13:40:17 +01:00
Scott Linder 60b1967c39 [AMDGPU] Add Scratch Wave Offset to Scratch Buffer Descriptor in entry functions
Add the scratch wave offset to the scratch buffer descriptor (SRSrc) in
the entry function prologue. This allows us to removes the scratch wave
offset register from the calling convention ABI.

As part of this change, allow the use of an inline constant zero for the
SOffset of MUBUF instructions accessing the stack in entry functions
when a frame pointer is not requested/required. Entry functions with
calls still need to set up the calling convention ABI stack pointer
register, and reference it in order to address arguments of called
functions. The ABI stack pointer register remains unswizzled, but is now
wave-relative instead of queue-relative.

Non-entry functions also use an inline constant zero SOffset for
wave-relative scratch access, but continue to use the stack and frame
pointers as before. When the stack or frame pointer is converted to a
swizzled offset it is now scaled directly, as the scratch wave offset no
longer needs to be subtracted first.

Update llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst to reflect these changes to the calling
convention.

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75138
2020-03-19 15:35:16 -04:00
Jay Foad 43830790d7 [AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.

I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.

To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.

Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.

Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB

Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2020-02-28 21:35:34 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 86f9117d47 AMDGPU: Don't report 2-byte alignment as fast
This is apparently worse than 1-byte alignment. This does not attempt
to decompose 2-byte aligned wide stores, but will stop trying to
produce them.

Also fix bug in LoadStoreVectorizer which was decreasing the alignment
and vectorizing stack accesses. It was assuming a stack object was an
alloca that could have its base alignment changed, which is not true
if the pointer is derived from a function argument.
2020-02-11 18:35:00 -05:00