find a copy constructor/assignment operator used
in getter/setter synthesis. This removes an unintended
diagnostics and makes objc++ consistant with objective-c.
// rdar: //8550657.
llvm-svn: 116631
verify that we aren't in a message-send expression before digging into
the identifier or looking ahead more tokens. Fixes a regression
(<rdar://problem/8483253>) I introduced with bracket insertion.
llvm-svn: 114968
follows objective's semantics and is not overload'able
with an assignment operator. Fixes a crash and a missing
diagnostics. Radar 8379892.
llvm-svn: 113555
an lvalue of another, compatible Objective-C object type (e.g., a
subclass). Introduce a new initialization sequence step kind to
describe this binding, along with a new cast kind. Fixes PR7741.
llvm-svn: 110513
disambiguation keywords outside of templates in C++98/03. Previously,
the warning would fire when the associated nested-name-specifier was
not dependent, but that was a misreading of the C++98/03 standard:
now, we complain only when we're outside of any template.
llvm-svn: 106161
in several important ways:
- VLAs of non-POD types are not permitted.
- VLAs cannot be used in conjunction with C++ templates.
These restrictions are intended to keep VLAs out of the parts of the
C++ type system where they cause the most trouble. Fixes PR5678 and
<rdar://problem/8013618>.
llvm-svn: 104443
instance variables:
- Use isRecordType() rather than isa<RecordType>(), so that we see
through typedefs in ivar types.
- Mark the destructor as referenced
- Perform C++ access control on the destructor
llvm-svn: 104206
ObjCObjectType, which is basically just a pair of
one of {primitive-id, primitive-Class, user-defined @class}
with
a list of protocols.
An ObjCObjectPointerType is therefore just a pointer which always points to
one of these types (possibly sugared). ObjCInterfaceType is now just a kind
of ObjCObjectType which happens to not carry any protocols.
Alter a rather large number of use sites to use ObjCObjectType instead of
ObjCInterfaceType. Store an ObjCInterfaceType as a pointer on the decl rather
than hashing them in a FoldingSet. Remove some number of methods that are no
longer used, at least after this patch.
By simplifying ObjCObjectPointerType, we are now able to easily remove and apply
pointers to Objective-C types, which is crucial for a certain kind of ObjC++
metaprogramming common in WebKit.
llvm-svn: 103870
references and isa expressions. Also, test template instantiation of
unresolved member references to Objective-C ivar references and isa
expressions.
llvm-svn: 102374
support dependent receivers for class and instance messages, along
with dependent message arguments (of course), and check as much as we
can at template definition time.
This commit also deals with a subtle aspect of template instantiation
in Objective-C++, where the type 'T *' can morph from a dependent
PointerType into a non-dependent ObjCObjectPointer type.
llvm-svn: 102071
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
during message sends) over to the new initialization code and away
from the C-only CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints. The enables the use
of C++ types in method parameters and message arguments, as well as
unifying more initialiation code overall.
llvm-svn: 102035
Objective-C++ have a more complex grammar than in Objective-C
(surprise!), because
(1) The receiver of an instance message can be a qualified name such
as ::I or identity<I>::type.
(2) Expressions in C++ can start with a type.
The receiver grammar isn't actually ambiguous; it just takes a bit of
work to parse past the type before deciding whether we have a type or
expression. We do this in two places within the grammar: once for
message sends and once when we're determining whether a []'d clause in
an initializer list is a message send or a C99 designated initializer.
This implementation of Objective-C++ message sends contains one known
extension beyond GCC's implementation, which is to permit a
typename-specifier as the receiver type for a class message, e.g.,
[typename compute_receiver_type<T>::type method];
Note that the same effect can be achieved in GCC by way of a typedef,
e.g.,
typedef typename computed_receiver_type<T>::type Computed;
[Computed method];
so this is merely a convenience.
Note also that message sends still cannot involve dependent types or
values.
llvm-svn: 102031
sends. Major changes include:
- Expanded the interface from two actions (ActOnInstanceMessage,
ActOnClassMessage), where ActOnClassMessage also handled sends to
"super" by checking whether the identifier was "super", to three
actions (ActOnInstanceMessage, ActOnClassMessage,
ActOnSuperMessage). Code completion has the same changes.
- The parser now resolves the type to which we are sending a class
message, so ActOnClassMessage now accepts a TypeTy* (rather than
an IdentifierInfo *). This opens the door to more interesting
types (for Objective-C++ support).
- Split ActOnInstanceMessage and ActOnClassMessage into parser
action functions (with their original names) and semantic
functions (BuildInstanceMessage and BuildClassMessage,
respectively). At present, this split is onyl used by
ActOnSuperMessage, which decides which kind of super message it
has and forwards to the appropriate Build*Message. In the future,
Build*Message will be used by template instantiation.
- Use getObjCMessageKind() within the disambiguation of Objective-C
message sends vs. array designators.
Two notes about substandard bits in this patch:
- There is some redundancy in the code in ParseObjCMessageExpr and
ParseInitializerWithPotentialDesignator; this will be addressed
shortly by centralizing the mapping from identifiers to type names
for the message receiver.
- There is some #if 0'd code that won't likely ever be used---it
handles the use of 'super' in methods whose class does not have a
superclass---but could be used to model GCC's behavior more
closely. This code will die in my next check-in, but I want it in
Subversion.
llvm-svn: 102021
correctly diagnose instantiation of a function parameter with Objective-C
class type (since Objective-C classes can't be passed by value).
llvm-svn: 101031
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
from an instance method. Previously, we were following the Objective-C
name lookup rules for ivars, which are of course completely different
from and incompatible with the Objective-C++ rules.
For the record, the Objective-C++ rules are the sane ones.
This is another part of <rdar://problem/7660386>.
llvm-svn: 96677
InitializationSequence (when a FunctionDecl is present). This required
a few small fixes to initialization sequences:
- Make sure to use the adjusted parameter type for initialization of
function parameters.
- Implement transparent union calling semantics in C
llvm-svn: 91902
small bug fixes in SemaInit, switch over SemaDecl to use it more often, and
change a bunch of diagnostics which are different with the new initialization
code.
llvm-svn: 91767
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
- These kinds of "shotgun" tests are very slow, and do not belong in the
regression suite. If these kinds of tests are regarded to have value, they
should be added to the LLVM test-suite.
- I would actually like to remove all of these tests, but I left Sema/carbon.c
and SemaObjC/cocoa.m...
llvm-svn: 75399
The idea is to segregate Objective-C "object" pointers from general C pointers (utilizing the recently added ObjCObjectPointerType). The fun starts in Sema::GetTypeForDeclarator(), where "SomeInterface *" is now represented by a single AST node (rather than a PointerType whose Pointee is an ObjCInterfaceType). Since a significant amount of code assumed ObjC object pointers where based on C pointers/structs, this patch is very tedious. It should also explain why it is hard to accomplish this in smaller, self-contained patches.
This patch does most of the "heavy lifting" related to moving from PointerType->ObjCObjectPointerType. It doesn't include all potential "cleanups". The good news is additional cleanups can be done later (some are noted in the code). This patch is so large that I didn't want to include any changes that are purely aesthetic.
By making the ObjC types truly built-in, they are much easier to work with (and require fewer "hacks"). For example, there is no need for ASTContext::isObjCIdStructType() or ASTContext::isObjCClassStructType()! We believe this change (and the follow-up cleanups) will pay dividends over time.
Given the amount of code change, I do expect some fallout from this change (though it does pass all of the clang tests). If you notice any problems, please let us know asap! Thanks.
llvm-svn: 75314
- This is a WIP...
- This adds -march= handling to the driver, and fixes the defaulting
of -mcpu on Darwin (which was using the wrong test).
Instead of handling -m{sse, ...} in the driver, pass them to clang-cc as
-target-feature [+-]name
In clang-cc, communicate with the (clang) target to discover the legal
features of a target, and the features which are enabled based on
-mcpu. This is currently hardcoded just enough to not be a feature
regression, we need to get this information from the backend's
TableGen information somehow.
This is used to construct the full list of features which are being
used, which is in turn used to initialize the predefines.
llvm-svn: 71061
- <rdar://problem/6741594> [pth] don't abuse -x to drive pth
generation
- Simpler, and fixes PR3915.
Cleanup test cases for PTH:
- Update to use -emit-pth
- Removed PTH test of carbon.c and cocoa.mm; these didn't actually
verify anything, and since PTH is token based the extra coverage
(over cocoa.m) isn't particularly helpful.
- Split PTH tests in cocoa.m to cocoa-pth.m, solely to increase
available parallelism when running tests.
Ted, could you update the PTH test cases (include-pth.c and
cocoa-pth.m) to have some sort of positive check that the PTH is
getting used? "# of PTH cache hits" or "tokens read from PTH cache"
statistics would work great. :)
llvm-svn: 68189
Also, put Objective-C protocols into their own identifier
namespace. Otherwise, we find protocols when we don't want to in C++
(but not in C).
llvm-svn: 63877
a.k.a. Koenig lookup) in C++. Most of the pieces are in place, but for
two:
- In an unqualified call g(x), even if the name does not refer to
anything in the current scope, we can still find functions named
"g" based on ADL. We don't yet have this ability.
- ADL will need updating for friend functions and templates.
llvm-svn: 63692
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
id<P0>
The intended overloading behavior of these entities isn't entirely
clear, and GCC seems to have some strange limitations (e.g., the
inability to overload on id<P0> vs. id<P1>). We'll want to revisit
these semantics and determine just how Objective-C++ overloading
should really work.
llvm-svn: 60142
converting a pointer to one Objective-C interface into a pointer to another
Objective-C interface, and conversions with 'id'. The semantics seems
to match GCC, although they seem somewhat ad hoc.
Fixed a few cases where we assumed the C++ definition of isObjectType,
but were getting the C definition, causing failures in trouble with
conversions to void pointers.
llvm-svn: 60130
John McCall