Motivating use case is ".cu.cc" extensions used in some bazel projects.
Alternative is to work around this with IncludeIsMainRegex in styles.
I proposed this approach because it seems like a better default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86597
Previously a NodeRole would generally be prefixed with the `NodeKind`,
we remove this prefix, as it we redundant and made tests more noisy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86636
* Generate `CallExpression` syntax node for all semantic nodes inheriting from
`CallExpr` with call-expression syntax - except `CUDAKernelCallExpr`.
* Implement all the accessors
* Arguments of `CallExpression` have their own syntax node which is based on
the `List` base API
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86544
We should see `NodeRole` information in the dump because that exposes how the
accessors will behave.
Functional changes in the dump:
* Surround Leaf tokens with `'`
* Append `Node` dumps with `NodeRole` information, except for unknown roles
* Append marks to `Node` dumps, instead of prepending
Non-functional changes:
* `::dumpTokens(llvm::raw_ostream, ArrayRef<syntax::Token>, const
SourceManager &SM)` always received as parameter a `syntax::Token *`
pointing to `Leaf::token()`. Changed the function to
`dumpLeaf(llvm::raw_ostream, syntax::Leaf *, const SourceManager&)`
* `dumpTree` acted on a Node, rename to `dumpNode`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85330
For an user define `<`, `x < y` would yield the syntax tree:
```
BinaryOperatorExpression
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-x
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-<
`-IdExpression
`-UnqualifiedId
`-y
```
But there is no syntatic difference at call site between call site or
built-in `<`. As such they should generate the same syntax tree, namely:
```
BinaryOperatorExpression
|-IdExpression
| `-UnqualifiedId
| `-x
|-<
`-IdExpression
`-UnqualifiedId
`-y
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85750
Currently, changes to includes are applied to an entire rule. However,
include changes may be specific to particular edits within a rule (for example,
they may apply to one file but not another). Also, include changes may need to
carry metadata, just like other changes. So, we make include changes first-class
edits.
Reviewed By: tdl-g
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85734
This patch lifts `RootID` out of the `RewriteRule` class so that constructs
(e.g. inline functions) can that refer to the root id don't need to depend on
the `RewriteRule` class.
With this dependency, the patch is able to collect all `ASTEdit` helper function
declarations together with the class declaration, before the introduction of the
`RewriteRule` class. In the process, we also adjust some of the comments.
This patch is essentially a NFC.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85733
Summary:
We want NestedNameSpecifier syntax nodes to be generally supported, not
only for `DeclRefExpr` and `DependentScopedDeclRefExpr`.
To achieve this we:
* Use the `RecursiveASTVisitor`'s API to traverse
`NestedNameSpecifierLoc`s and automatically create its syntax nodes
* Add links from the `NestedNameSpecifierLoc`s to their syntax nodes.
In this way, from any semantic construct that has a `NestedNameSpecifier`,
we implicitly generate its syntax node via RAV and we can easily access
this syntax node via the links we added.
We defined a List construct to help with the implementation of list-like
grammar rules. This is a first implementation of this API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85295
This is our grammar rule for nested-name-specifiers:
globalbal-specifier:
/*empty*/
simple-template-specifier:
template_opt simple-template-id
name-specifier:
global-specifier
decltype-specifier
identifier
simple-template-specifier
nested-name-specifier:
list(name-specifier, ::, non-empty, terminated)
It is a relaxed version of C++ [expr.prim.id] and quite simpler to map to our API.
TODO: refine name specifiers, `simple-template-name-specifier` and
decltype-name-specifier` are token soup for now.
`OS << ND->getDeclName();` is equivalent to `OS << ND->getNameAsString();`
without the extra temporary string.
This is not quite a NFC since two uses of `getNameAsString` in a
diagnostic are replaced, which results in the named entity being
quoted with additional "'"s (ie: 'var' instead of var).
We use inheritance to model the grammar's disjunction rule:
literal:
integer-literal
character-literal
floating-point-literal
string-literal
boolean-literal
pointer-literal
user-defined-literal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85186
This skips searching for `target` related flags in the existing args if
we don't have a valid target to insert.
Depends on D85076
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85077
The logic was using incorrect flag versions. For example:
- `-target=` can't be a prefix, it must be `--target=`.
- `--driver-mode` can't appear on its own, value must be attached to it.
While fixing those, also changes the append logic to make use of new
`--target=X` format instead of the legacy `-target X` version.
In addition to that makes use of the OPTTable instead of hardcoded strings to
make sure helper also gets updated if clang's options are modified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85076
Currently an Arena can only be built while consuming a TokenBuffer,
some users (like clangd) might want to share a TokenBuffer with multiple
compenents. This patch changes Arena's TokenBuffer member to be a reference so
that it can be created with read-only token buffers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84973
Adds the `between` combinator and registers it with the parser. As a driveby, updates some deprecated names to their current versions.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84315
The new combinator, `rewriteDescendants`, applies a rewrite rule to all
descendants of a specified bound node. That rewrite rule can refer to nodes
bound by the parent, both in the matcher and in the edits.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84409
Summary:
This patch adds various combinators that help in constructing `EditGenerator`s:
* `noEdits`
* `ifBound`, specialized to `ASTEdit`
* `flatten` and `flattenVector` which allow for easy construction from a set
of sub edits.
* `shrinkTo`, which generates edits to shrink a given range to another that
it encloses.
Reviewers: asoffer, gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84310
`Metadata` is being changed from an `llvm::Any` to a `MatchConsumer<llvm::Any>`
so that it's evaluation can be be dependent on on `MatchResult`s passed in.
Reviewed By: ymandel, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83820
`Metadata` is being changed from an `llvm::Any` to a `MatchConsumer<llvm;:Any>`, so that it's evaluation can be be dependent on `MatchResult`s passed in.
Reviewed By: ymandel, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83820
Summary:
This allows efficiently accessing all expansions (without iterating over each
token and searching), and also identifying tokens within a range that are
affected by the preprocessor (which is how clangd will use it).
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84009
Summary:
If there is no record in compile_commands.json, we try to find suitable record with `MatchTrie.findEquivalent()` call.
This is very expensive operation with a lot of `llvm::sys::fs::equivalent()` calls in some cases.
This patch disables file symlinks for performance reasons.
Example scenario without this patch:
- compile_commands.json generated at clangd build (contains ~3000 files).
- it tooks more than 1 second to get compile command for newly created file in the root folder of LLVM project.
- we wait for 1 second every time when clangd requests compile command for this file (at file change).
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, djasper, klimek, ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83621
* as we are using them only for integer and floating literals they have
the same behavior
* FileRange::text is simpler to call and is within the context of
syntax trees
Summary:
Given an UserDefinedLiteral `1.2_w`:
Problem: Lexer generates one Token for the literal, but ClangAST
references two source locations
Fix: Ignore the operator and interpret it as the underlying literal.
e.g.: `1.2_w` token generates syntax node IntegerLiteral(1.2_w)
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82157
Summary:
How does RecursiveASTVisitor call the WalkUp callback for expressions?
* In pre-order traversal mode, RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp
callback from the default implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* In post-order traversal mode when we don't have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor also calls the WalkUp callback from the default
implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* However, in post-order traversal mode when we have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp callback from PostVisitStmt.
As a result, when the user overrides the Traverse callback, in pre-order
traversal mode they never get the corresponding WalkUp callback. However
in the post-order traversal mode the WalkUp callback is invoked or not
depending on whether the data recursion optimization could be applied.
I had to adjust the implementation of TraverseCXXForRangeStmt in the
syntax tree builder to call the WalkUp method directly, as it was
relying on this behavior. There is an existing test for this
functionality and it prompted me to make this extra fix.
In addition, I had to fix the default implementation implementation of
RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseSynOrSemInitListExpr to call WalkUpFrom in
the same manner as the implementation generated by the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT
macro. Without this fix, the InitListExprIsPostOrderNoQueueVisitedTwice
test was failing because WalkUpFromInitListExpr was never called.
Reviewers: eduucaldas, ymandel
Reviewed By: eduucaldas, ymandel
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82486
This reverts commit 8bf4c40af8.
This reverts commit 7b0be962d6.
This reverts commit 94454442c3.
Some compilers on some buildbots didn't accept the specialization of
is_same_method_impl in a non-namespace scope.
Summary:
How does RecursiveASTVisitor call the WalkUp callback for expressions?
* In pre-order traversal mode, RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp
callback from the default implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* In post-order traversal mode when we don't have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor also calls the WalkUp callback from the default
implementation of Traverse callbacks.
* However, in post-order traversal mode when we have a DataRecursionQueue,
RecursiveASTVisitor calls the WalkUp callback from PostVisitStmt.
As a result, when the user overrides the Traverse callback, in pre-order
traversal mode they never get the corresponding WalkUp callback. However
in the post-order traversal mode the WalkUp callback is invoked or not
depending on whether the data recursion optimization could be applied.
I had to adjust the implementation of TraverseCXXForRangeStmt in the
syntax tree builder to call the WalkUp method directly, as it was
relying on this behavior. There is an existing test for this
functionality and it prompted me to make this extra fix.
In addition, I had to fix the default implementation implementation of
RecursiveASTVisitor::TraverseSynOrSemInitListExpr to call WalkUpFrom in
the same manner as the implementation generated by the DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT
macro. Without this fix, the InitListExprIsPostOrderNoQueueVisitedTwice
test was failing because WalkUpFromInitListExpr was never called.
Reviewers: eduucaldas, ymandel
Reviewed By: eduucaldas, ymandel
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82486
Currently, `maybeExtendRange` takes a `CharSourceRange`, but only works
correctly for the `TokenRange` case. This change adds proper support for the
`CharRange` case.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82901
This change adds a Metadata field to ASTEdit, Edit, and AtomicChange so that
edits can have associated metadata and that metadata can be constructed with
Transformer-based RewriteRules. Metadata is ignored when applying edits to
source, but other consumers of AtomicChange can use this metadata to direct how
they want to consume each edit.
Reviewed By: ymandel, gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82226
This patch improves the error message provided by the stencil that handles
source from a range selector.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82654
Renames the overloaded `RangeSelector` combinator `range` to the more
descriptive `enclose` and `encloseNodes`. The old overloads are left in place
and marked deprected and will be deleted at a future time.
Reviewed By: tdl-g
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82592
Summary: Deletes `text()` and `selection()` combinators, since they have been deprecated for months.
Reviewers: tdl-g
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82225
Summary:
As discussed previously when landing patch for OpenMP in Flang, the idea is
to share common part of the OpenMP declaration between the different Frontend.
While doing this it was thought that moving to tablegen instead of Macros will also
give a cleaner and more powerful way of generating these declaration.
This first part of a future series of patches is setting up the base .td file for
DirectiveLanguage as well as the OpenMP version of it. The base file is meant to
be used by other directive language such as OpenACC.
In this first patch, the Directive and Clause enums are generated with tablegen
instead of the macros on OMPConstants.h. The next pacth will extend this
to other enum and move the Flang frontend to use it.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, DavidTruby, fghanim, ABataev, jdenny, hfinkel, jhuber6, kiranchandramohan, kiranktp
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, jdenny
Subscribers: arphaman, martong, cfe-commits, mgorny, yaxunl, hiraditya, guansong, jfb, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81736
Summary:
As discussed previously when landing patch for OpenMP in Flang, the idea is
to share common part of the OpenMP declaration between the different Frontend.
While doing this it was thought that moving to tablegen instead of Macros will also
give a cleaner and more powerful way of generating these declaration.
This first part of a future series of patches is setting up the base .td file for
DirectiveLanguage as well as the OpenMP version of it. The base file is meant to
be used by other directive language such as OpenACC.
In this first patch, the Directive and Clause enums are generated with tablegen
instead of the macros on OMPConstants.h. The next pacth will extend this
to other enum and move the Flang frontend to use it.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, DavidTruby, fghanim, ABataev, jdenny, hfinkel, jhuber6, kiranchandramohan, kiranktp
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, jdenny
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny, yaxunl, hiraditya, guansong, jfb, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81736
Summary:
Currently, `cat` validates range selections before extracting the corresponding
source text. However, this means that any range inside a macro is rejected as an
error. This patch changes the implementation to first try to map the range to
something reasonable. This makes the behavior consistent with handling of ranges
used for selecting portions of the source to edit.
Also updates a clang-tidy lit-test for one of the checks which was affected by
this change.
Reviewers: gribozavr2, tdl-g
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82126
This patch adds a parser for a `RangeSelector` written as a string. The format
is closely based on the way one would right the selector in C++. This should
enable use of `RangeSelector`s from tools like clang-query and web UIs.
When targetting CodeView, the goal is to store argv0 & cc1 cmd-line in the emitted .OBJ, in order to allow a reproducer from the .OBJ alone.
This patch is to simplify https://reviews.llvm.org/D80833
Summary:
I changed `markStmtChild` to ignore implicit expressions the same way as
`markExprChild` does it already. The test that I modified crashes
without this change.
Reviewers: hlopko, eduucaldas
Reviewed By: hlopko, eduucaldas
Subscribers: gribozavr2, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81019
Summary:
`RewriteRule`'s `applyFirst` was brittle with respect to the default setting of the
`TraversalKind`. This patch builds awareness of traversal kinds directly into
rewrite rules so that they are insensitive to any changes in defaults.
Reviewers: steveire, gribozavr
Subscribers: hokein, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80606
Summary:
Currently, all changes returned by a single application of a rule must fit in
one atomic change and therefore must apply to one file. However, there are
patterns in which a single rule will want to modify multiple files; for example,
a header and implementation to change a declaration and its definition. This
patch relaxes Transformer, libTooling's interpreter of RewriteRules, to support
multiple changes.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgrang, jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80239
Summary:
These files tend to be hand-authored, and people get very confused.
I can't think of any reason that such whitespace would be intended.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80160
It can be used to avoid passing the begin and end of a range.
This makes the code shorter and it is consistent with another
wrappers we already have.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78016
Summary:
* accept -x cu to indicate language is CUDA
* transfer CUDA language flag to header-file arguments
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77451
Summary:
This revision simplifies the representation of edits in rewrite rules. The
simplified form is more general, allowing the user more flexibility in building
custom edit specifications.
The changes extend the API, without changing the signature of existing
functions. So this only risks breaking users that directly accessed the
`RewriteRule` struct.
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Subscribers: jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77419
This reverts commit 97aa593a83 as it
causes problems (PR45453) https://reviews.llvm.org/D77574#1966321.
This additionally adds an explicit reference to FrontendOpenMP to
clang-tidy where ASTMatchers is used.
This is hopefully just a temporary solution. The dependence on
`FrontendOpenMP` from `ASTMatchers` should be handled by CMake
implicitly, not us explicitly.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77666
Summary:
Same restrictions apply as in the other direction: macro arguments are
not supported yet, only full macro expansions can be mapped.
Taking over from https://reviews.llvm.org/D72581.
Reviewers: gribozavr2, sammccall
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77209
Summary:
Our previous definition of "top-level" was too informal, and didn't
allow for overlapping macros that each directly produce expanded tokens.
See D77507 for previous discussion.
Fixes http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45428
Reviewers: kadircet, vabridgers
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77615
Summary:
The motivation here is fixing https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45428, see
D77507. The fundamental problem is that a "top-level" expansion wasn't precisely
defined. Repairing this concept means that TokenBuffer's "top-level expansion"
may not correspond to a single macro expansion. Example:
```
M(2); // expands to 1+2
```
The expansions overlap, but neither expansion alone yields all the tokens.
We need a TokenBuffer::Mapping that corresponds to their union.
This is fairly easy to fix in CollectPPExpansions, but the current design of
TokenCollector::Builder needs a fix too as it relies on the macro's expansion
range rather than the captured expansion bounds. This fix is hard to make due
to the way code is reused within Builder. And honestly, I found that code pretty
hard to reason about too.
The new approach doesn't use the expansion range, but only the expansion
location: it assumes an expansion is the contiguous set of expanded tokens with
the same expansion location, which seems like a reasonable formalization of
the "top-level" notion.
And hopefully the control flow is easier to follow too, it's considerably
shorter even with more documentation.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77614
Summary:
ASTMatchers is used in various places and it now exposes the
LLVMFrontendOpenMP library to its users without them needing to depend
on it explicitly.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: mgorny, yaxunl, bollu, guansong, martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77574
Saves only 36 includes of ASTContext.h and related headers.
There are two deps on ASTContext.h:
- C++ method overrides iterator types (TinyPtrVector)
- getting LangOptions
For #1, duplicate the iterator type, which is
TinyPtrVector<>::const_iterator.
For #2, add an out-of-line accessor to get the language options. Getting
the ASTContext from a Decl is already an out of line method that loops
over the parent DeclContexts, so if it is ever performance critical, the
proper fix is to pass the context (or LangOpts) into the predicate in
question.
Other changes are just header fixups.
Move the listing of allowed clauses per OpenMP directive to the new
macro file in `llvm/Frontend/OpenMP`. Also, use a single generic macro
that specifies the directive and one allowed clause explicitly instead
of a dedicated macro per directive.
We save 800 loc and boilerplate for all new directives/clauses with no
functional change. We also need to include the macro file only once and
not once per directive.
Depends on D77112.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77113
See rational here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76173#1922916
Time to compile Attr.h in isolation goes from 2.6s to 1.8s.
Original patch by Johannes, plus some additions from Reid to fix some
clang tooling targets.
Effect on transitive includes is marginal, though:
$ diff -u <(sort thedeps-before.txt) <(sort thedeps-after.txt) \
| grep '^[-+] ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
104 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/OpenMPClause.h
87 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.h
19 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h
19 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SetVector.h
14 - /usr/include/c++/9/set
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76184
Summary:
This patch removes delayed folding and replaces it with forward peeking.
Delayed folding was previously used as a solution to the problem that
declaration doesn't have a representation in the AST. For example following
code:
```
int a,b;
```
is expressed in the AST as:
```
TranslationUnitDecl
|-...
|-VarDecl `int a`
`-VarDecl `int b`
```
And in the syntax tree we need:
```
*: TranslationUnit
`-SimpleDeclaration
|-int
|-SimpleDeclarator
| `-a
|-,
|-SimpleDeclarator
| `-b
|-;
```
So in words, we need to create SimpleDeclaration to be a parent of
SimpleDeclarator nodes. Previously we used delayed folding to make sure SimpleDeclarations will be
eventually created. And in case multiple declarators requested declaration
creation, declaration range was extended to cover all declarators.
This design started to be hard to reason about, so we decided to replace it with
forward peeking. The last declarator node in the chain is responsible for creating
SimpleDeclaration for the whole chain. Range of the declaration corresponds to
the source range of the declarator node. Declarator decides whether its the last
one by peeking to the next AST node (see `isResponsibleForCreatingDeclaration`).
This patch does following:
* Removed delayed folding logic
* Tweaks Token.dumpForTests
* Moves getQualifiedNameStart inside BuildTreeVisitor
* Extracts BuildTreeVisitor.ProcessDeclaratorAndDeclaration
* Renames Builder.getDeclRange to Builder.getDeclarationRange and uses the
method in all places.
* Adds a bunch of tests
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76922
Summary:
Copy of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72446, submitting with Ilya's permission.
Only used to assign roles to child nodes for now. This is more efficient
than doing range-based queries.
In the future, will be exposed in the public API of syntax trees.
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76355
Summary:
Rollforward of
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGdd12826808f9079e164b82e64b0697a077379241 after
temporarily adding -fno-delayed-template-parsing to the TreeTest.
Original summary:
> Copy of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72334, submitting with Ilya's permission.
>
> Handles template declaration of all kinds.
>
> Also builds template declaration nodes for specializations and explicit
> instantiations of classes.
>
> Some missing things will be addressed in the follow-up patches:
>
> * specializations of functions and variables,
> * template parameters.
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76418
Summary:
Copy of https://reviews.llvm.org/D72334, submitting with Ilya's permission.
Handles template declaration of all kinds.
Also builds template declaration nodes for specializations and explicit
instantiations of classes.
Some missing things will be addressed in the follow-up patches:
specializations of functions and variables,
template parameters.
Reviewers: gribozavr2
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76346
Sam McCall